Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Mar 20;8(4):505–511. doi: 10.1038/nn1430

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Mean (± s.d.) grasp movement times in Experiment 1a. Subjects S1, S3 and S8 received TMS to aIPS either 30, 65, 80 or 95 ms after the end of object rotation. Movement was significantly prolonged only when TMS was delivered at the 30 ms time point but not thereafter, suggesting that processing within aIPS may have been completed by 65 ms after object perturbation. Note the absence of this effect in the object–non-perturbed condition.