Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 11;11:e16235. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16235

Table 2. ERA test variables: descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, sample size) and group comparisons (two-sided Student’s t-test and two-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test) of the observed ERA data.

Measures Trainee psychotherapists Control group Total Statistic Effect size
M (SD) [95% CI] M (SD) [95% CI] M (SD) [95% CI] t\U [95% CI] d/r [95% CI]b
PRE ( N = 154) n = 49 n = 105
ERAM total 0.45 (0.08)
[0.42–0.47]
0.39 (0.09)
[0.38–0.41]
0.41 (0.09)
[0.40–0.42]
t(152) = 3.64
p < 0.001***
[0.25–0.86]
d = 0.63
[0.32–0.98]
ERAM audio 0.43 (0.11)
[0.40–0.46]
0.36 (0.11)
[0.34–0.38]
0.38 (0.11)
[0.36–0.40]
t(152) = 3.84
p < 0.001***
[0.04–0.11]
d = 0.67
[0.34–1.03]
ERAM video 0.42 (0.11)
[0.39–0.46]
0.42 (0.12)
[0.40–0.45]
0.42 (0.11)
[0.41–0.44]
t(152) = 0.15
p = 0.88
[−0.04 to 0.4]
d = 0.03
[−0.30 to 0.36]
ERAM audio-video 0.64 (0.13)
[0.61–0.68]
0.55 (0.13)
[0.53–0.57]
0.58 (0.13)
[0.56–0.60]
t(152) = 4.26
p < 0.001***
[0.05–0.14]
d = 0.74
[0.40–1.08]
ERAM positive valence 0.47 (0.11)
[0.44–0.50]
0.43 (0.12)
[0.41–0.46]
0.44 (0.12)
[0.43–0.46]
t(152) = 2.05
p = 0.04*
[0.00–0.08]
d = 0.35
[0.02–0.69]
ERAM negative valence 0.43 (0.09)
[0.40–0.46]
0.36 (0.11)
[0.34–0.39]
0.39 (0.11)
[0.37–0.40]
t(152) = 3.58
p < 0.001***
[0.03–0.10]
d = 0.62
[0.31–1.01]
ERAM high arousal 0.46 (0.10)
[0.43–0.49]
0.41 (0.11)
[0.39–0.43]
0.43 (0.11)
[0.41–0.44]
U = 3,182
p = 0.02*
[0.01–0.08]
r = 0.19
[0.04–0.33]
ERAM low arousal 0.64 (0.09)
[0.61–0.66]
0.58 (0.11)
[0.56–0.60]
0.60 (0.11)
[0.58–0.62]
U = 3,358
p = 0.002**
[0.03–0.08]
r = 0.25
[0.09–0.4]
MICRO total 0.50 (0.14)
[0.46–0.54]
0.45 (0.15)
[0.42–0.54]
0.46 (0.15)
[0.44–0.49]
t(152) = 2.02
p = 0.05*
[0.00–0.10]
d = 0.35
[0.03–0.76]
FOLLOW-UP ( n = 72) n = 31 n = 41
ERAM total 0.45 (0.09)
[0.42–0.47]
0.45 (0.10)
[0.43–0.47]
0.45 (0.09)
[0.43–0.47]
t(70) = 0.19
p = 0.85
[−0.05 to 0.04]
d = −0.04
[−0.48 to 0.44]
ERAM audio 0.41 (0.10)
[0.39–0.44]
0.39 (0.11)
[0.39–0.44]
0.40 (0.10)
[0.37–0.42]
t(70) = 1.05
p = 0.30
[−0.02 to 0.08]
d = 0.25
[−0.24 to 0.75]
ERAM video 0.43 (0.13)
[0.39–0.47]
0.49 (0.13)
[0.46–0.51]
0.46 (0.14)
[0.43–0.49]
t(70) = −1.74
p = 0.09
[−0.12 to 0.01]
d = −0.41
[−0.92 to 0.02]
ERAM audio-video 0.67 (0.13)
[0.63–0.70]
0.63 (0.14)
[0.60–0.70]
0.64 (0.14)
[0.61–0.68]
U = 707
p = 0.42
[−0.04 to 0.09]
r = 0.10
[0.00–0.34]
ERAM positive valence 0.47 (0.15)
[0.43–0.51]
0.50 (0.12)
[0.47–0.52]
0.48 (0.13)
[0.45–0.51]
t(70) = −0.94
p = 0.35
[−0.09 to 0.03]
d = −0.22
[−0.72 to 0.3]
ERAM negative valence 0.44 (0.08)
[0.41–0.46]
0.42 (0.10)
[0.40–0.44]
0.43 (0.09)
[0.41–0.45]
t(70) = 0.66
p = 0.51
[−0.03 to 0.06]
d = 0.16
[−0.33 to 0.64]
ERAM high arousal 0.46 (0.11)
[0.43–0.49]
0.45 (0.11)
[0.43–0.47]
0.45 (0.11)
[0.43–0.48]
U = 661
p = 0.78
[−0.05 to 0.06]
r = 0.03
[0.00–0.28]
ERAM low arousal 0.64 (0.11)
[0.61–0.67]
0.66 (0.11)
[0.63–0.67]
0.65 (0.11)
[0.63–0.67]
U = 566
p = 0.43
[−0.08 to 0.03]
r = 0.09
[0.01–0.34]
MICRO total 0.54 (0.16)
[0.49–0.58]
0.60 (0.16)
[0.57–0.63]
0.58 (0.16)
[0.54–0.61]
U = 458
p = 0.04*
[−0.14 to −0.00]
r = 0.24
[0.03–0.45]

Note:

For the mixed multilevel modeling analyses, missing data were handled via maximum likelihood estimation. Table 2 presents the observed scores. [95% CI]b: 95% Confidence Interval for effect size is based on 1,000 bootstrap resamples of the mean difference (percentile interval). Common standardized effect size estimates: Cohen’s d: d = 0.2 (small effect), d = 0.5 (moderate effect) and d = 0.8 (large effect); Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test: r = 0.10 (small), r = 0.30 (moderate), r = 0.50 (large). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Holm adjusted).