Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;260(4):376–389. doi: 10.1002/path.6088

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses of germinal centre properties in LNs of patients from Guy's TNBC cohort.

Guy's TNBC cohort Model P Hazard ratio 95% CI
Univariate distant metastasis free survival
LN‐positive TNBC (N = 57), involved LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.04 0.454 0.23–0.95
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.03 0.441 0.21–0.92
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) 0.03 0.335 0.13–0.85
LN‐positive TNBC (N = 57), cancer‐free LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.02 0.283 0.09–0.94
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.1 0.496 0.20–1.22
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) 0.3 0.534 0.18–1.62
LN‐negative TNBC (N = 39), cancer‐free LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.002 0.14 0.03–0.63
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.02 0.22 0.05–0.98
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) NA NA NA
Covariate P Model P Hazard ratio 95% CI
Multivariate distant metastasis‐free survival
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, histological grade, and number of involved
LN‐positive TNBC (N = 57), involved LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.05 0.03 0.431 0.18–1.01
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.04 0.02 0.422 0.19–0.94
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) 0.03 0.04 0.262 0.08–0.86
LN‐positive TNBC (N = 57), cancer‐free LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.08 0.03 0.329 0.09–1.15
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.13 0.05 0.485 0.19–1.25
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) 0.33 0.2 0.520 0.14–1.92
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, histological grade
LN‐negative TNBC (N = 39), cancer‐free LNs
Mean GC number per patient (<2 versus ≥2) 0.04 0.06 0.20 0.04–0.95
Mean GC area per patient (≤0.015 mm2 versus >0.015 mm2) 0.19 0.2 0.352 0.07–1.66
Mean GC circularity per patient (≤0.69 versus >0.69) NA NA NA NA

Statistical significance was assessed using likelihood ratio tests.