Table 2.
Performance comparison across models.
All metabolites | Tyrosine and Proline | Tyrosine | Proline | All metabolites | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No tuning | No tuning | No tuning | No tuning | Parameter tuning | |
Positive predictive value | 0.865 | 0.707 | 0.727 | 0.429 | 0.943 |
Negative predictive value | 0.814 | 0.718 | 0.66 | 0.444 | 0.844 |
F1 | 0.831 | 0.716 | 0.657 | 0.400 | 0.853 |
Accuracy | 0.837 | 0.712 | 0.687 | 0.437 | 0.887 |
AUC | 0.897 | 0.753 | 0.732 | 0.509 | 0.927 |
We built five models with (1) all 173 metabolites, (2) only tyrosine and proline, (3) only tyrosine, and (4) only proline. Additionally, we show the results of the tuned parameters (tenfold CV).