Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 14;13:388. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02685-y

Table 2.

Treatment effect and effect size in the HAMD-17 and MADRS total score estimated using the propensity weighed and non-weighted analyses.

Study SEP360-029 Comparison TE StdErr P* SD Effect_size
Reference Pbo vs. Dasotr. 0.5 mg 0.236 0.985 1.000 7.818 0.030
Pbo vs. Dasotr. 2.0 mg −0.466 0.981 1.000 7.849 0.059
Pbo vs. Venlafax. 150 mg 4.104 1.015 0.0094 7.990 0.514
Propensity Pbo vs. Dasotr. 0.5 mg 3.008 0.916 0.115 7.273 0.414
Analysis Pbo vs. Dasotr. 2.0 mg 2.718 0.953 0.324 7.620 0.357
Pbo vs. Venlafax. 150 mg 6.928 0.958 <0.0001 7.543 0.918
Study SEP380-201 Comparison TE StdErr p* SD Effect_size
Reference Pbo vs. Amisulp. 200 mg 3.411 1.619 0.6188 11.336 0.301
Pbo vs. Amisulp. 400 mg 3.280 1.592 0.6513 11.170 0.294
Propensity Pbo vs. Amisulp. 200 mg 6.504 1.315 <0.0001 9.208 0.706
Analysis Pbo vs. Amisulp. 400 mg 7.151 1.325 <0.0001 9.295 0.769

TE treatment effect, StdErr standard error, P probability, SD standard deviation.

*P-value adjusted for multiplicity.