Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;13(12):7753–7764. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-560

Table 3. Comparison of 3D strain parameters in the prediabetic, diabetic, and control groups.

Parameters CON (n=33) TH1 (n=35) TH2 (n=40) P value
TH1 vs. CON TH2 vs. CON TH1 vs. TH2
GLS (%) 18.64±2.43 15.21±1.49 13.49±2.36 <0.001 <0.001 0.002
GCS (%) 18.09±2.37 14.62±1.75 12.95±2.20 <0.001 <0.001 0.003
GAS (%) 31.30±3.88 27.51±3.31 24.80±3.86 <0.001 <0.001 0.006
GRS (%) 49.18±5.91 39.17±4.55 35.72±7.19 <0.001 <0.001 0.046

Data are expressed as mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3D, three-dimensional; CON, control group; TH1, prediabetes group; TH2, diabetes group; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GCS, global circumferential strain; GAS, global area strain; GRS, global radial strain; SD, standard deviation.