Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;10:1281843. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1281843

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies stratified by type of analysis performed.

Source Study design Total recruited Population Intervention Lower cost Cost-effective
Cost analysis
Beaupre et al. (31) RCT* 131 Knee arthroplasty 40–75 years old Physiotherapy, Education Control
Mcgregor et al. (32) RCT* 35 Knee arthroplasty Education Intervention
Barberan-Garcia et al. (33) RCT* 125 Major abdominal surgery >70 years old ASA 3 or 4 DASI<46 Physiotherapy, Education Intervention
Smedley et al. 2004 (34) RCT* 152 Major abdominal surgery Nutrition Intervention
Robinson et al. (37) Retrospective 462 Thoracic neoplasm resection Nutrition Intervention
Braga et al. (40) RCT 92 Major abdominal surgery Nutrition Intervention^
Ploussard et al. (41) RCT 507 Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Physiotherapy, Education, Nutrition Intervention
Cost-effectiveness analysis/Cost-utility analysis
Boden et al. (35) RCT 441 Major abdominal surgery Education Intervention^ Intervention
Rolving et al. (43) RCT* 90 Lumbar spine surgery (max 3 levels) 18–64 years old Education Intervention^ Intervention
Partridge et al. (38) RCT* 209 Major vascular surgery >65 years old Medical optimization Intervention^ Intervention
Furze et al. (39) RCT* 204 Coronary artery bypass graft Education Control Intervention
Leeds et al. (42) Decision tree model 10,000 simulated Colon cancer surgery Medical optimisation Intervention^ Intervention

Lower cost represents the group where the cost analysis was lower; cost-effective represents the group that the cost-effectiveness analysis favors. *Studies that received national funding. ^Studies where cost analysis was the primary outcome. RCT, Randomized controlled trial; N, Nutrition; P, Physiotherapy; E, Education; M, Medical Optimization.