Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 14;23:286. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02395-x

Table 2.

Summary of included studies

Qualitative studies
Author (year) Country Main topic Design/method Participants (n) Cancer field
Abe (2017) [24] USA Genomics-informed treatment decisions for radiation therapy Semi-structured stakeholder meetings Patients, surgeons, oncologists, industry representatives, biomedical informatics. N = 22 Prostate cancer
Bijlsma (2018) [25] The Netherlands Unsolicited genetic information obtained using NGS Individual interviews Patients n = 24 Cancer
Bombard (2014) [26] Canada Gene expression profiling Individual interviews, focus group discussion

Oncologists, n = 14

patients, n = 28

Breast cancer
Bombard (2015) [27] Canada Gene expression profiling Individuals interviews Oncologists n = 14 Breast cancer
Costa (2021) [28] Canada Prognostic-based genomic testing Focus group discussions Patients, n = 26 Lymphoid Cancers
Dodson (2017) [29] USA Pharmacogenomics Open-ended survey Oncology nurses, n = 28 Cancer
Hamilton (2021) [30] USA Precision oncology Focus group discussions Oncology clinicians, n = 68 Breast, melanoma and thoracic cancer
Hamilton (2017) [31] USA Secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling Individual interviews Patients with advanced cancer, n = 40 Breast, bladder, colorectal, or lung cancer
Harris (2013) [32] USA Kirsten ras tumor mutation testing (KRAS) Individual interviews Oncologists, n = 34 Colorectal cancer
Kerr (2019) [33] UK Molecular cancer diagnosis/treatment Individual interviews Practitioners n = 25 Cancer
Mamzer (2017)a [34] France Translational oncology research Case study

Patient and expert committee members,

n = not specified

Cancer
McCradden (2020) [35] Canada AI in health care research Individual interviews Patients, caregivers, and health-care providers, n = 30 Meningioma
Perry (2017) [36] Germany "Personalized" treatment research (e.g. biomarkers for stratification) Individual interviews Patients, n = 40 Colorectal cancer
Pellegrini (2011) [37] France Tumor gene expression analysis Individual interviews Patients, n = 37 Breast cancer
Pichler (2020) [38] Germany Molecular diagnosis Individual interviews Patients, n = 30 Cancer, advanced stage
Rattay (2018) [39] UK Predictive radiogenomics testing for breast radiation toxicity Individual interviews Patients, n = 21 Breast cancer
Rohrmoser (2019) [40] Germany Molecular diagnostics Individual interviews Patients, n = 30 Cancer, advanced stage
Steltzer (2020) [41] Austria Personalized medicine Individual interviews

Patients n = 2

Health care professionals, n = 14

Cancer
Therond (2020) [42] UK BRCA genetic testing Observation and individual interviews Patients, n = 25 Breast, ovarian
Wright (2019) [43] UK BRCA 1 & 2 testing Individual interviews and team meetings

Clinicians

n = 19, teams

Breast cancer
Mixed-methods
 Best (2020) [44] Australia Somatic molecular profiling (MP) test results Survey and individual interviews Patients survey n = 1299, interview n = 20 Advanced cancers
Quantitative methods
 Issa (2013) [45] USA Novel personalized medicine genomic diagnostics Discrete Choice Experiment survey Patients, n = 300 breast and colorectal
 Soellner (2021) [46] USA AI for diagnostics Survey Public, n = 452 Skin cancer
 Yang (2019) [47] China AI in medicine Survey Patients, n = 527 Cancer
Theoretical, opinion pieces
 Aminololama-Shakeri (2019) [48] USA AI in breast imaging radiology Opinion paper Breast
 Ansmann (2018) [49] Germany Precision medicine Commentary Cancer
 Bunnik (2021) [50] The Netherlands Genomic sequencing Perspective Cancer
 Carter (2020) [51] Australia AI systems Theoretical review Breast cancer
 Korngiebel (2017) [52] USA Pharmacogenomic tests and tests for inherited cancer risk Review/theoretical Cancer
 Marchiano (2018) [53] USA Precision oncology Communication Cancer
 McFarland (2017) [54] USA Precision medicine oncology and targeted therapies Editorial Cancer
 McFarland (2017) [55] USA Precision medicine oncology Editorial Cancer
 McGrath (2021) [56] USA Genetic and genomic testing Perspective Cancer
 Stoeklé (2018) [57] France Precision medicine, Molecular tumor board (MTB) Opinion paper Cancer
 Triberti (2020) [58] Italy AI health decision making Perspective Cancer

aThe study by Mamzer et al. (2017) is a description of the involvement of patient representatives and to establish a long-term partnership integrating patient’s expectations. No formal qualitative analysis was performed. It was, therefore, not included in the quality assessment