Table 4:
Summary of EWAS results for MESA subgroup analysis.
| Black NH | white NH | Hispanic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N sites | N | N sites | N | N sites | |
| Birth in a Jim Crow state | 221 | 0 | 237 | 0 | NA1 | NA1 |
| Parent’s highest education (high vs low) | 115 | 0 | 134 | 0 | NA2 | NA2 |
| Parent’s highest education (high vs mid) | 125 | 0 | 164 | 0 | NA2 | NA2 |
| Participant’s education (high vs low) | 54 | 0 | 55 | 0 | NA2 | NA2 |
| Participant’s education (high vs mid) | 198 | 0 | 227 | 0 | NA2 | NA2 |
| Household poverty:income ratio | 214 | 0 | 227 | 1 | 67 | 0 |
| Racialized economic segregation | 219 | 1 | 233 | 0 | 59 | 0 |
| Light Absorption Coefficient | 208 | 10 | 231 | 6 | 57 | 0 |
| Nitrogen oxides | 208 | 20 | 231 | 19 | 57 | 0 |
| Major Discrimination Scale (1–2 vs 0) | 200 | 1 | 236 | 0 | 67 | 0 |
| Major Discrimination Scale (1–2 vs 3+) | 94 | 0 | NA3 | NA3 | NA3 | NA3 |
1
The EWAS for Jim Crow birth state was not run for Hispanic participants due to small cell numbers.
2
The EWAS for parental and participant education were not run for Hispanic participants, due to small cell numbers.
3
The EWAS was not run for MDS (score of 1–2 vs 3+) for white NH and Hispanic participants in MESA, as no participants had a score of 3 or more.