Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;86(5):330–332. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.019

Table 1:

Comparison of SNPs significant in Gelernter et al. (1) that are also reported in Kranzler et al. (5).

P-values
Gene rsID Gelernter Maxalc. META Gelernter Maxalc. EUR Gelernter Maxalc. AA Kranzler AUDIT-C. METAa Kranzler AUDIT-C. EUR Kranzler AUDIT-C. AA Kranzler AUD. META Kranzler AUD. EUR Kranzler AUD. AA
ADH1B rs1229984 1.1E-49 4.9E-47 3.6E-133 4.8E-102 1.3E-19 4.7E-85 4.5E-74 4.2E-05
ADH1B rs2066702 2.3E-12 6.4E-15 1.3E-03 4.7E-24
CRHR1b rs61667602; rs77804065 1.0E-13 1.5E-12
FGF14 rs1360983 9.9E-09
XPO7b rs2291317; rs7821592 2.5E-08 3.6E-08
RNU6–53P rs1577857 4.2E-08 4.2E-08 2.2E-05 8.3E-09 2.6E-01 3.2E−9 3.2E−7 8.7E−3
LOC105376602 rs7931459 4.6E-08
GCKR 5.8E-06 2.0E−16 1.7E−16 0.11 2.3E−13 1.4E−16 0.68
KLB 5.5E-06 3.1E−9 3.5E−9 NA

Data assembled from the two studies, both of which were drawn from the MVP; the degree of overlap was not reported in either.

a

Kranzler meta-analysis included additional populations.

b

Different top SNPs in EUR vs. meta-analysis.