Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 14;13(12):879–890. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad054

Table 5.

Satisfaction, relevance and helpfulness of patient navigator (n = 268 patients in DVD+PN group who talked with navigator)

Strongly agree/agree Neutral/not sure Strongly disagree/disagree
n (%) n (%) n (%)
The Navigator…
 Was easy to understand 266 (99.6) 1 (0.4)
 Was helpful 262 (98.5) 2 (0.8) 2 (0.8)
 Gave me information that was new 154 (57.7) 34 (12.7) 79 (29.6)
 Gave me information that was important 259 (97.4) 2 (0.8) 5 (1.9)
 Discussed things that were embarrassing 16 (6.0) 5 (1.9) 246 (92.1)
 Covered just the right amount of information 256 (96.2) 4 (1.5) 6 (2.3)
 Took too much time 11 (4.1) 3 (1.1) 252 (94.7)
 Was convenient 254 (95.1) 8 (3.0) 5 (1.9)
 Sounded like she knew people in my community 52 (20.1) 116 (44.8) 91 (35.1)
 Was someone I could trust 251 (94.0) 13 (4.9) 3 (1.1)
 Should talk to other women in my community about screening 235 (89.4) 23 (8.7) 5 (1.9)
Gave me the information I needed to get
 Breast cancer screening (n = 187) 144 (77.0) 10 (5.3) 33 (17.6)
 Cervical cancer screening (n = 152) 118 (77.6) 8 (5.3) 26 (17.1)
 Colorectal cancer screening (n = 230) 193 (83.9) 9 (3.9) 28 (12.2)
Helped me decide to get
 Breast cancer screening (n = 188) 103 (54.8) 25 (13.3) 60 (31.9)
 Cervical cancer screening (n = 151) 77 (51.0) 23 (15.2) 51 (33.8)
 Colorectal cancer screening (n = 230) 149 (64.8) 24 (10.4) 57 (24.8)