Table 2.
The diagnostic performance of RDP signature in predicting LNM in NF-PanNETs in the training, internal and external validation cohort.
| AUC | 95% CI | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training cohort | 0.89 | 0.83–0.94 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.82 | |
| Internal validation cohort | 0.87 | 0.80–0.94 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | |
| External validation cohort | 0.91 | 0.85–0.97 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.82 | |
| Training cohort vs Internal validation cohort | 0.75 | |||||||
| Training cohort vs External validation cohort | 0.43 | |||||||
| Internal validation cohort vs External validation cohort | 0.56 |
AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.