Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 10;65:102253. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102253

Table 1.

Table of participant characteristics.

Participant characteristic First 64mT Scan
n = 87
Gestation at birth [Weeks+days] 38+2 (33+3–39+1)
Weight at birth [kg] 2.92 (2.03–3.45)
Age at scan [Days] 9 (4–36)
PMA at scan [Weeks+days] 39+6 (37+4–40+6)
Weight at scan [kg] 3.03 (2.45–3.45)
Sex
 Female (%) 33 (38)
 Male (%) 54 (62)
Medical support during scan
 Mechanical ventilation (%) 7 (8)
 CPAP (%) 1 (1)
 LFNC (%) 9 (10)
 Prostaglandin infusion (%) 8 (9)
 Temperature controlled mattress (%) 19 (22)
 Inotropic therapy (%) 2 (2)
 Arterial line (%) 2 (2)
 Given chloral hydrate sedationa for 3T MR scan (%) 29 (33)
3T scan indication
 Clinical 59 (68)
 Infants without suspected neurological abnormality 28 (32)
Co-morbidity
 Born preterm (%) 30 (34)
 Congenital cardiac lesions (%) 23 (26)
 Encephalopathy, abnormal movements/seizures or suspected HIE (%) 17 (20)
 Suspected developmental brain abnormalities (%) 10 (11)
 Suspected metabolic disorder (%) 2 (2)
 Post-meningitis (%) 1 (1)
 Post-ECMO (%) 1 (1)
Focus of sequence development
 Solely T1 weighted sequence development (%) 44 (51)
 Solely T2 weighted sequence development (%) 9 (10)
 T1 & T2 weighted sequence development (%) 34 (39)

Continuous data are shown as: Median (Interquartile range).

PMA: post-menstrual age; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; LFNC: low flow nasal cannulae (Oxygen); HIE: hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; ECMO: extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation.

a

No infants without suspected neurological abnormality received chloral hydrate in this cohort.