Table 3:
Adoption of Managerial Practices
| Log repairs (1) | Log maintenance (2) | Log injuries (3) | Log bonus (4) | Log strikes (5) | Prob training (6) | Log inventory (7) | Log product lines (8) | Prob marketing (9) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||
| J-I × Period 1 | −0.010*** | 0.005*** | −0.020** | −0.000 | 0.000 | −0.001 | −0.010 | 0.002 | −0.001 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.010) | (0.000) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.011) | (0.003) | (0.001) | |
| J-I × Period 5 | −0.033*** | 0.014*** | −0.043*** | −0.000 | 0.006*** | −0.051*** | 0.007 | −0.002 | −0.028*** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.010) | (0.000) | (0.002) | (0.006) | (0.010) | (0.004) | (0.005) | |
| J-I × Period 10 | −0.057*** | 0.025*** | −0.064*** | 0.000 | 0.030*** | −0.062*** | 0.008 | −0.004 | −0.064*** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.011) | (0.000) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.012) | (0.005) | (0.007) | |
| J-R × Period 1 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.414*** | −0.000 | 0.043*** | −0.005 | 0.002 | 0.001* |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.010) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.010) | (0.011) | (0.002) | (0.001) | |
| J-R × Period 5 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.431*** | −0.268*** | 0.628*** | 0.008 | −0.001 | −0.023*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.010) | (0.000) | (0.006) | (0.025) | (0.010) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
| J-R × Period 10 | −0.000 | −0.000 | −0.000 | 0.459*** | −0.268*** | 0.927*** | 0.033*** | −0.000 | −0.061*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.009) | (0.001) | (0.006) | (0.008) | (0.010) | (0.005) | (0.006) | |
| J-M × Period 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | −0.015*** | 0.015*** | 0.043*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.010) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.001) | (0.005) | (0.004) | (0.010) | |
| J-M × Period 5 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | −0.000 | 0.007*** | −0.038*** | −0.071*** | 0.538*** | 0.661*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.009) | (0.000) | (0.002) | (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.009) | (0.024) | |
| J-M × Period 10 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | −0.000 | 0.013*** | −0.062*** | −0.100*** | 0.606*** | 0.930*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.009) | (0.000) | (0.002) | (0.006) | (0.007) | (0.009) | (0.008) | |
| Observations | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 | 67,472 |
| R2 | 0.142 | 0.131 | 0.141 | 0.170 | 0.165 | 0.559 | 0.406 | 0.445 | 0.648 |
Notes: This table shows the coefficients of the interactions between the training variables and three selected period dummies (out of 15 period dummies included). The omitted period is the year before the TWI training (period −1). The distance from the TWI intervention for the nontreated firms is imputed using the distance from the TWI intervention of the first participating firm in the same subdistrict and application window. All the dependent variables are logged with the exception of two dummy variables that measure whether firms reported expenditures for on-the-job training (column 6; mean=0.06) or for marketing activities (column 9; mean=0.05). The regressions also include the treatment variables in isolation, as well as fixed effects for county-sector-period combinations, the application window, and the number of days between the opening of the window and the firm application. The sample includes applicant firms that either received only one TWI training or no training at all. Standard errors are clustered at the level of subdistricts and application windows.
p<0.01
p<0.05
p<0.1.