Table 3.
Multivariable logistic regression of the association between MOS-SSS and experiencing ≥1 TI, controlling for confounders
| Variables | Univariable Logistic Regressions | Multivariable Logistic Regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
| MOS-SSS score (per ten unit increase)b | 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) | 0.031 | 0.90 (0.83, 0.99) | 0.022 |
| Age at interview | ||||
| Less than 40 | Ref | |||
| 40 to 49 | 0.70 (0.40, 1.22) | 0.208 | Not selecteda | |
| 50 to 59 | 0.41 (0.23, 0.74) | 0.003 | ||
| 60 or more | 0.25 (0.11, 0.58) | 0.001 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | Ref | Ref | ||
| Female | 2.58 (1.61, 4.15) | < 0.001 | 1.75 (1.01, 3.03) | 0.045 |
| Other | 1.51 (0.32, 7.15) | 0.605 | 1.46 (0.27, 7.81) | 0.659 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Caucasian | Ref | Ref | ||
| Indigenous | 3.27 (1.93, 5.53) | < 0.001 | 2.46 (1.35, 4.49) | 0.003 |
| Asian/African/Black/ Caribbean/Latin | 0.65 (0.23, 1.90) | 0.435 | 0.83 (0.28, 2.48) | 0.744 |
| Other | 2.02 (0.94, 4.32) | 0.070 | 1.82 (0.81, 4.08) | 0.145 |
| Employment status | ||||
| Working | Ref | |||
| Unemployed | 2.50 (1.49, 4.20) | 0.001 | Not selecteda | |
| Other | 1.10 (0.57, 2.13) | 0.780 | ||
| Incarceration ever | ||||
|
No Yes |
Ref 3.26 (2.09, 5.09) |
< 0.001 | Not selecteda | |
| Homelessness in the last 12 months | ||||
|
No Yes |
Ref 3.24 (1.92, 5.49) |
< 0.001 |
Ref 2.21 (1.25, 3.90) |
0.006 |
| Mental health diagnosis ever | ||||
|
No Yes |
Ref 1.01 (0.64, 1.61) |
0.958 | Not selecteda | |
| Sexual activity in the last 12 months (n = 590) | ||||
|
No Yes |
Ref 0.98 (0.61, 1.55) |
0.913 |
Ref 1.49 (0.89, 2.50) |
0.131 |
| History of IDU | ||||
| Never | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes but more than a year ago | 2.05 (1.18, 3.57) | 0.011 | 1.78 (0.98, 3.23) | 0.060 |
| Yes in the past year | 3.72 (2.21, 6.26) | < 0.001 | 2.53 (1.43, 4.50) | 0.002 |
| Years of follow-up | 1.14 (0.87, 1.51) | 0.351 | 1.07 (0.80, 1.43) | 0.666 |
Bold text refers to p-values < 0.05
CI: confidence interval
IDU: injection drug use
aConfounders were selected for inclusion in the final model using a backward stepwise selection approach, which used the relative change in coefficients of the MOS-SSS score as a criterion, until the minimum change from the full model exceeded 5%
bMOS-SSS odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio reported per 10 unit increase. Reference category for TI: ‘No’