Table 3.
Performance analysis of ANN models for different hyperparameters.
| S.No. | No. of layers | Optimizer | epoch | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 3 | SDG | 50 | 76.05 |
| 2. | 4 | SDG | 50 | 76.2 |
| 3. | 4 | Adam | 200 | 77.34 |
| 4. | 5 | SDG | 50 | 77.9 |
| 5. | 5 | SDG | 200 | 78.2 |
| 5. | 5 | Adam | 50 | 79.18 |
| 6. | 5 | Adam | 200 | 79.396 |
| 7. | 6 | SDG | 50 | 78.89 |
| 8. | 6 | Adam | 200 | 79.34 |
| 9. | 10 | 86.895 | 200 | 78.9 |
The best model is shown in bold letters.