Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 4;14:1259672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259672

Table 2.

Means, standard errors (in brackets) of the outcome variables as a function of time (T1 and T2) and group (intervention and control).

Variable Intervention (n = 47) Wait-list control (n = 45) Time Group Time × group
T1 T2 T1 T2
Burnouta
Emotional Exhaustion 2.54 (0.91) 2.31 (0.57) 2.31 (0.73) 2.31 (0.72) F(1,89) = 3.78* η2G = 0.01 F(1,89) = 0.68 F(1,89) = 3.78* η2G = 0.01
Cynicism 1.73 (0.58) 1.54 (0.47) 1.57 (0.65) 1.64 (0.60) F(1,89) = 0.80 F(1,89) = 0.09 F(1,89) = 4.29* η2G = 0.01
Personal Inefficacy 4.20 (0.41) 4.30 (0.37) 4.29 (0.47) 4.16 (0.49) F(1,89) = 0.28 F(1,89) = 0.10 F(1,89) = 8.58** η2G = 0.02
Engagement
Vigor 3.77 (0.79) 3.93 (0.66) 4.00 (0.67) 3.88 (0.70) F(1,90) = 0.09 F(1,90) = 0.38 F(1,90) = 4.70* η2G = 0.01
Dedication 3.96 (0.85) 3.90 (0.70) 4.07 (0.78) 4.02 (0.83) F(1,90) = 0.64 F(1,90) = 0.62 F(1,90) = 0.01
Absorption 3.58 (0.93) 3.57 (0.85) 3.51 (0.87) 3.60 (0.84) F(1,89) = 0.22 F(1,89) = 0.01 F(1,89) = 0.50

Results are based on two assessments (N = 92). *p ≤ 0.05. **p ≤ 0.01. aControl group scores from a smaller sample (n = 44) as one participant did not complete this measure.