Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Achong 1997 | No caries outcome reported, only bacterial counts |
Araujo 2002 | Split‐mouth design |
Axelsson 1976 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Axelsson 1987 | Prophylaxis available to all groups during the experimental period. Flouride varnish and additional chlorhexidine received by some members of each group |
Bratthall 1995 | Split‐mouth design |
Dolles 1980 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Emilson 1982 | Fluoride comparator |
Ersin 2006 | Fluoride comparator |
Ersin 2008 | Fluoride comparator. Only one of the interventions was considered eligible for this review, as the other comparisons were either not relevant or not considered 'routine dental care' |
Fennis‐le 1998 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Gisselsson 1988 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Gisselsson 1994 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Gisselsson 2005 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Gokalp 2005 | Fluoride comparator |
Haukali 2003 | Split‐mouth design |
Hausen 2000 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Holst 2001 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Hoszek 1996 | Split‐mouth design |
Hoszek 2005 | Split‐mouth design |
Irmisch 2000 | Split‐mouth design |
Joharji 2001 | Split‐mouth design |
Leksell 2003 | Fluoride comparator |
Lindquist 2010 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Neeraja 2008 | Not RCT |
Petersson 1997 | Fluoride comparator |
Petti 2006 | Not RCT |
Plotzitza 2005 | Quote: "The allocation of children to groups CHX and C depended on the mothers voluntary participation in the 3‐month appointments for CHX applications". Non‐randomised study |
Rodrigues 1999 | Split‐mouth design |
Spets‐Happonen 1985 | Fluoride comparator |
Spets‐Happonen 1991 | Concomitant fluoride administration |
Splieth 2000 | Fluoride comparator |
Zhang 2006 | Split‐mouth design |
Zickert 1983 | Not RCT |
C: control CHX: chlorhexidine RCT: randomised controlled trial