Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 13;2015(4):CD008457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008457.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Achong 1997 No caries outcome reported, only bacterial counts
Araujo 2002 Split‐mouth design
Axelsson 1976 Concomitant fluoride administration
Axelsson 1987 Prophylaxis available to all groups during the experimental period. Flouride varnish and additional chlorhexidine received by some members of each group
Bratthall 1995 Split‐mouth design
Dolles 1980 Concomitant fluoride administration
Emilson 1982 Fluoride comparator
Ersin 2006 Fluoride comparator
Ersin 2008 Fluoride comparator. Only one of the interventions was considered eligible for this review, as the other comparisons were either not relevant or not considered 'routine dental care'
Fennis‐le 1998 Concomitant fluoride administration
Gisselsson 1988 Concomitant fluoride administration
Gisselsson 1994 Concomitant fluoride administration
Gisselsson 2005 Concomitant fluoride administration
Gokalp 2005 Fluoride comparator
Haukali 2003 Split‐mouth design
Hausen 2000 Concomitant fluoride administration
Holst 2001 Concomitant fluoride administration
Hoszek 1996 Split‐mouth design
Hoszek 2005 Split‐mouth design
Irmisch 2000 Split‐mouth design
Joharji 2001 Split‐mouth design
Leksell 2003 Fluoride comparator
Lindquist 2010 Concomitant fluoride administration
Neeraja 2008 Not RCT
Petersson 1997 Fluoride comparator
Petti 2006 Not RCT
Plotzitza 2005 Quote: "The allocation of children to groups CHX and C depended on the mothers voluntary participation in the 3‐month appointments for CHX applications".
 Non‐randomised study
Rodrigues 1999 Split‐mouth design
Spets‐Happonen 1985 Fluoride comparator
Spets‐Happonen 1991 Concomitant fluoride administration
Splieth 2000 Fluoride comparator
Zhang 2006 Split‐mouth design
Zickert 1983 Not RCT

C: control
 CHX: chlorhexidine
 RCT: randomised controlled trial