Table 4.

Median relative abundances of predominant genera with interquartile range in brackets. Bolded taxa indicate a significant difference way found in a Kruskal–Wallis pairwise comparison. Superscripts indicate which specific Kruskal–Wallis pairwise comparison was significant.

Taxa	AL	LD	LD-wdFMT	WD	WD-ldFMT
Acetatifactor	1.7 [1.32–2.96]	1.67 [1.37–1.93]	1.71 [1.58–2.12]	2.13 [1.91–3.29]	2.62 [1.8–3.33]
Akkermansia	17.72 [13.05–28.9]b	9.93 [7.44–10.41]b	13.21 [11.28–16.57]b	17.67 [8.14–19.71]	16.39 [11.01–21.5]
Alistipes	4.39 [2.69–6]abc	7.31 [6.35–10.35]b	7.01 [6.33–8.61]b	6.05 [3.58–7.4]	6.41 [5.03–7.72]c
Bacteroides	9.9 [6.84–14.25]ab	2.16 [1.85–4.25]b	6.28 [5.58–8.43]b	6.55 [4.37–9.97]	7.45 [6.32–9.02]
Bifidobacterium	0.52 [0.38–1.39]	1.06 [0.34–1.72]	1.79 [0.67–2.57]	0.48 [0.16–0.72]	0.35 [0.07–0.69]
Clostridiales*	3.42 [2.13–4.6]	4.23 [1.8–4.99]	3.58 [1.95–4.17]	2.33 [0.78–4.36]	4.41 [2.78–6.45]
Clostridium sensu stricto	1.93 [0.57–2.2]abc	4 [3.83–4.99]b	2.09 [0.05–2.8]b	3.72 [2.37–4.88]	4.1 [2.13–4.45]
Dubosiella	14.97 [11.94–18.62]c	22.24 [18.27–24.5]	16.54 [10.28–17.82]	12.32 [10.91–15.63]	10.14 [5.51–14.1]c
Faecalibaculum	0 [0–0]c	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]	0.05 [0.02–0.57]c
Lachnospiraceae*	9.72 [4.37–13.61]ab	15.35 [14.05–17.94]b	15.65 [13.4–18.85]b	12.31 [10.14–16.2]	11.08 [8.4–12.62]
Lactococcus	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]	0 [0–0]
Muribaculaceae*	9.14 [8.12–10.53]	8.92 [5.72–9.8]	8.27 [7.02–10.22]	8.14 [6.3–8.28]	8.83 [6.69–9.86]
Paramuribaculum	7.93 [6.58–8.49]ac	8.15 [7.26–9.94]	8.44 [5.95–9.27]	11.3 [9.97–12.48]	10.95 [9.58–12.02]c
Parasutterella	1.37 [0.98–1.47]	1.63 [1.41–1.75]	1.08 [0.93–1.59]	1.29 [1.02–1.43]	0.92 [0.76–1.5]
Ruminococcaceae*	4.71 [3.67–5.45]	4.06 [3.63–4.85]	4.92 [4.41–7.08]	4.58 [3.79–5.57]	5 [3.45–7.58]

^aComparisons between all samples without AL vs AL samples.

^bComparisons between LD and LD-wdFMT samples compared to the AL samples.

^cComparisons between WD-ldFMT samples and AL samples.

*Not further classified to genus.