Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1998 Jul;180(13):3483–3485. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.13.3483-3485.1998

The fnr Gene of Bacillus licheniformis and the Cysteine Ligands of the C-Terminal FeS Cluster

Anette Klinger 1, Jan Schirawski 1, Philippe Glaser 2, Gottfried Unden 1,*
PMCID: PMC107310  PMID: 9642208

Abstract

In the facultatively anaerobic bacterium Bacillus licheniformis a gene encoding a protein of the fumarate nitrate reductase family of transcriptional regulators (Fnr) was isolated. Unlike Fnr proteins from gram-negative bacteria, but like Fnr from Bacillus subtilis, the protein contained a C-terminal cluster of cysteine residues. Unlike in Fnr from B. subtilis, this cluster (Cys226-X2-Cys229-X4-Cys234) is composed of only three Cys residues, which are supposed to serve together with an internal residue (Cys71) as the ligands for an FeS center. Transfer of the B. licheniformis gene to an fnr mutant of B. subtilis complemented the ability for synthesis of nitrate reductase during anaerobic growth.


Many of the O2-responsive gene regulators of bacteria are members of the fumarate nitrate reductase-cyclic AMP receptor protein family of transcriptional regulators (12, 13, 15, 17) with predicted structures similar to those of the cyclic AMP receptor protein (11). The Fnr (stands for fumarate nitrate reductase regulator) protein from Escherichia coli (FnrEc) controls the expression of a variety of genes, mainly of anaerobic respiration and metabolism (5, 13). It contains a N-terminal cluster of three essential cysteine residues which are supposed to bind together with Cys122 a [4Fe 4S]2+ cluster which is required for O2 sensing (4, 7, 8, 10, 16). A wide variety of gram-negative bacteria contain an Fnr of this type (for an overview, see references 13, 15, and 17). The few examples known of Fnr-like proteins from gram-positive bacteria like Flp from Lactobacillus casei and Fnr from Bacillus subtilis (FnrBs) show characteristic differences with respect to the cysteine residues (1, 3). Flp contains only two Cys residues, which have been suggested to be oxidized from the dithiol to the disulfide state by O2 (3). In FnrBs the sensory N-terminal Cys cluster of E. coli appears to be replaced by a C-terminal extension with a cluster of four Cys residues similar to that from FnrEc (1). FnrBs contains six cysteine residues, and it is assumed that three Cys residues from the C terminus together with one Cys residue from the central part of the protein bind a polynuclear FeS center, as occurs with FnrEc. Since FnrBs is the only Fnr protein of this type known so far, the fnr gene of Bacillus licheniformis (fnrBl) was isolated.

fnrBs-like genes in B. licheniformis and Bacillus megaterium.

Genomic DNAs of Bacillus and Paenibacillus strains were analyzed by Southern blotting with a probe derived from the fnrBs gene. The probe (Fig. 1) comprised major parts of the fnrBs gene, including sequences corresponding to the C-terminal Cys cluster. The probe hybridized to DNA fragments of B. licheniformis and B. megaterium genomic DNAs. With genomic DNAs from Paenibacillus (formerly Bacillus) macerans and Paenibacillus polymyxa, no hybridization signal was detected. From a partial gene bank containing 1-kb ClaI fragments of B. licheniformis DNA, positive colonies were identified by colony hybridization with the fnrBs probe. The cloned fragment of the positive clones (pMW72) (Fig. 1) contained the 3′ end of a gene homologous to fnrBs. The missing 5′ region was obtained by inverse PCR (Fig. 1). The DNA region obtained comprised the fnrBs-homologous gene, located within two incomplete open reading frames similar to the narK and ywiC genes of B. subtilis (Fig. 1) (1, 6).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

fnr locus of B. licheniformis. The numbers (base pairs) give the sizes of the corresponding genes and intergenic regions. The location of the fnrBs probe and the sequences of the fragments contained in pMW72 and pMW93 are shown. The probe was generated by PCR from genomic DNA of B. subtilis with the oligonucleotides oBsfnr3 (5′-GCA GAA GAG CTT TAT CTG ATT CAA TC-3′) and oBsfnr4 (5′-GCA ATT TTC ACA CTC AAT CTC ACA TC-3′). Plasmid pMW72 is a derivative of pBluescriptII KS carrying a 911-bp ClaI fragment of the genomic DNA of B. licheniformis, which hybridized with probe fnrBs. The fragment of pMW93 was obtained by PCR of genomic DNA of B. licheniformis with the oligonucleotides oBlikom1 (5′-CGT GAT CTA GAT CGT CCA AAA CGA AGG-3′), which introduces an XbaI restriction site, and oBlikom2 (5′-GCT CAG TCG ACA CTG TGC TTC ATG TCC TTG TTT G-3′), which introduces a SalI restriction site. The generated PCR fragment (945 bp) was cloned into the XbaI and SalI sites of pDG148 (14), resulting in pMW93. The fragment generated by inverse PCR (iPCR) was produced from genomic PstI fragments after ligation and PCR amplification with the oligonucleotides oBlifnr1 (5′-TGC GTG CTC ATC CAT TTC ATA AAC TC-3′) and oBlifnr4 (5′-CGA TTA TCT TAA TCG ACA GTT TCC TCC-3′). The nucleotide sequences were determined by the dideoxy chain termination method with fluorescently labeled nucleotides.

Properties of FnrBl.

The supposed fnrBl gene encodes a protein of 237 amino acid residues with high sequence identity (81%) and similarity (97%) to FnrBs (Fig. 2) and includes the allosteric domain and a DNA-binding helix-turn-helix domain. The DNA-binding region is followed by a short C-terminal sequence with a cysteine cluster. Due to their similarities to the gene and protein from B. subtilis, the gene and protein from B. licheniformis are designated fnrBl and FnrBl, respectively.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Comparison of FnrBl as predicted from the fnrBl gene to FnrBs. Identical (:) and similar (.) amino acid residues are shown. Helices αE and αF of the helix-turn-helix motif are represented by shading. Comparison was performed with the Align program of the GeneStream SSearch network server with default parameters. Conserved (↓) and nonconserved (⇑) cysteine residues are marked. The nucleotide sequence of fnrBs has the accession no. Y16671 (EMBL database).

In FnrBl only five cysteine residues are found, all in conserved positions relative to those of FnrBs. The C-terminal cluster consists of only three residues (Cys226, Cys229, and Cys234) (Fig. 2). Cys223 of FnrBs is replaced by an arginine residue in FnrBl. Lack of Cys223 was confirmed by repeated independent PCR amplification from genomic DNA and sequencing of the fragments. For the binding of polynuclear FeS clusters, four cysteine residues are required. It is suggested that Cys71 and the three Cys residues from the C-terminal cluster (Cys226-X2-Cys229-X4-Cys234) serve this function. Cys184 is in a unfavorable position for liganding of the presumptive FeS cluster. The residue is located in the presumptive DNA-binding helix αE of the protein and points away from the other cysteine residues, according to the supposed three-dimensional structure (1). Thus, in FnrBl only four Cys residues remain as potential ligands for the cluster. The spacing of the C-terminal Cys residues is similar to that in the N terminus of FnrEc (Cys20-X2-Cys23-X5-Cys29). This C-terminal cysteine cluster might be characteristic for Bacillus-type Fnr.

Function of FnrBl as an O2-sensitive transcriptional regulator.

FnrBs is supposed to function as a transcriptional activator of nitrate metabolism (nar genes) under anaerobic conditions in a manner similar to that of FnrEc (1, 6). In B. licheniformis, too, nitrate reductase is produced only under anoxic conditions (Table 1). It was tested whether fnrBl is able to restore nitrate reductase activity in an fnrBs mutant. The fnrBs mutant was no longer able to grow with nitrate under anaerobic conditions in a mineral medium (Fig. 3) due to the lack of nitrate reductase activity (Table 1), in agreement with earlier findings (1). Transformation of the mutant with a plasmid carrying the fnrBl gene (pMW93) (Fig. 1) fully restored nitrate reductase activity in the transformed strain (Table 1). Growth of the transformed strain on nitrate was complemented by the fnrBl gene too, but not completely (Fig. 1). This result suggests that functions other than that of nitrate reductase which are required for growth by nitrate respiration are not restored completely by fnrBl. The regulation by FnrBl was oxygen sensitive, since nitrate reductase activity in the transformed strain was negligible after aerobic growth. The experiments therefore suggest that FnrBl functions as an oxygen-sensitive transcriptional regulator in a manner similar to that of FnrBs.

TABLE 1.

Complementation of an fnr mutant of B. subtilis 168 by fnrBl introduced by transformation with plasmid pMW93 (fnrBl+)

Strain Nitrate reductase (U/g of protein)a
Increase (fold)
Aerobic growth Anaerobic growth
B. subtilis 168 1.6 131 82
B. subtilis 168 fnr::Spcr 0.2 2.6 13
B. subtilis 168 fnr::Spcr (pMW93) ≤0.2 180 900
B. licheniformis 1.4 134 96
a

Measured in cell extracts with reduced benzyl viologen (averages of three independent assays) (9). Growth occurred in mineral medium with Casamino Acids (9) and 20 mM glucose (aerobic growth) or 20 mM glucose plus 20 mM nitrate (anaerobic growth). 

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Growth of B. licheniformis (•), B. subtilis 168 (▴), B. subtilis 168 fnr::Spcr (◊), and B. subtilis 168 fnr::Spcr transformed (2) with plasmid pMW93 (⧫) in mineral medium supplemented with Casamino Acids (9) and glucose plus nitrate (20 mM each) under anaerobic conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinisches Forschungszentrum (Universität Mainz), and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.

We are grateful to D. Jahn (Freiburg) for supplying B. subtilis strains.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cruz Ramos H, Boursier L, Moszer I, Kunst F, Danchin A, Glaser P. Anaerobic transcription activation in Bacillus subtilis: identification of distinct FNR-dependent and -independent regulatory mechanisms. EMBO J. 1995;14:5984–5994. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00287.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cutting S M, Vander Horn P B. One-step transformation procedure. In: Harwood C R, Cutting S M, editors. Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. p. 68. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gostik D O, Green J, Irvine A S, Gasson M J, Guest J R. A novel regulatory switch mediated by the FNR-like protein of Lactobacillus casei. Microbiology. 1998;144:705–717. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-3-705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Green J, Bennett B, Jordan P, Ralph E T, Thomson A J, Guest J R. Reconstitution of the [4Fe-4S] cluster in FNR and demonstration of the aerobic-anaerobic transcription switch in vitro. Biochem J. 1996;316:887–892. doi: 10.1042/bj3160887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gunsalus R P. Control of electron flow in Escherichia coli: coordinated transcription of respiratory pathway genes. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:7069–7074. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.22.7069-7074.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoffman T, Troup B, Szabo A, Hungerer C, Jahn D. The anaerobic life of Bacillus subtilis: cloning of the genes encoding the respiratory nitrate reductase system. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;131:219–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khoroshilova N, Beinert H, Kiley P I. Iron-sulphur cluster disassembly in the FNR protein of Escherichia coli by O2: [4Fe-4S] to [2Fe-2S] conversion with loss of biological activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6087–6092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Melville S B, Gunsalus R P. Mutations in fnr that alter anaerobic regulation of electron transport-associated genes in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1990;256:18733–18736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schirawski J, Unden G. Anaerobic respiration of Bacillus macerans with fumarate, TMAO, nitrite and nitrate and regulation of the pathways by oxygen and nitrate. Arch Microbiol. 1995;163:148–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharrocks A D, Green J, Guest J R. In vivo and in vitro mutants of FNR, the anaerobic transcriptional regulator of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1990;270:119–122. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81248-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shaw D J, Rice D W, Guest J R. Homology between CAP and Fnr, a regulator of anaerobic respiration in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:241–247. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spiro S. The FNR family of transcriptional regulators. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 1994;66:23–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00871630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spiro S, Guest J R. FNR and its role in oxygen-regulated gene expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1990;75:399–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stragier P, Bonamy C, Karmazyn-Campelli C. Processing of a sporulation sigma factor in Bacillus subtilis: how morphological structure could control gene expression. Cell. 1988;52:697–704. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90407-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Unden G, Bongaerts J, Becker S, Holighaus G, Schirawski J, Six S. O2-sensing and O2-dependent gene regulation in facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unden G, Schirawski J. The O2 responsive transcriptional regulator FNR of Escherichia coli: the search for signals and reactions. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:205–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4731841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Spanning R J, De Boer A P, Reijnders W N, Westerhoff H V, Stouthamer A H, Van der Oost J. FnrP and NNR of Paracoccuss denitrificans are both members of the FNR family of transcriptional activators but have distinct roles in respiratory adaptation in response to oxygen limitation. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:893–907. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2801638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES