Table 4.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study | Competitive level | N | Age (years old) | Sex | Experimental groups (n) | Control groups (n) | Randomization | Study duration (w) | Outcomes extracted | Instruments/tests for measuring the outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brose et al. [30] | Trained | 21 | 18–19 | Men | 2 groups (n = ND) | 1 group (n = ND) | No | 6 | Throwing velocity; Throwing accuracy |
Throwing at maximal velocity for a target at 35 ft. Accuracy was determined by measuring the distance from the center of the target to the place the ball hit. |
| Carter et al. [36] | Trained | 24 | 19.7 ± 1.3 | ND | 1 group (n = 13) | 1 group (n = 11) | Yes | 8 | Throwing velocity | The throwing velocity of each participant was measured using a calibrated JUGS MPH Cordless Radar Gun. The evaluation of maximum throwing velocity was conducted over a distance of 18.44 m (60 feet 6 inches). |
| DeRenne et al. [31] | Trained | 30 | 16–18 | ND | 2 groups (n = 20) | 1 group (n = 10) | Yes | 10 | Throwing velocity | The measurement of throwing velocity utilized an electromagnetic radiation radar. The test involved ten baseball pitches, each using a 5-ounce baseball. |
| DeRenne et al. [34] | Trained | 225 | 16.6 ± 0.6 and 19.6 ± 0.5 | Men | 2 groups (n = 150) | 1 group (n = 75) | Yes | 10 | Throwing velocity | The measurement of throwing velocity utilized an electromagnetic radiation radar. The test involved fifteen baseball pitches, each using a 5-ounce baseball. |
| Escamilla et al. [38] | Trained | 34 | 12.5 ± 1.5 | ND | 1 group (n = 17) | 1 group (n = 17) | Yes | 4 | Throwing velocity | The measurement of throwing velocity was conducted using a calibrated Jugs Tribar Sport radar gun (Jugs Pitching Machine Company, Tualatin, OR, USA). Each participant performed overhand throws from a flat surface with maximum effort, targeting a point positioned at approximately chest level and 13.7 m away. |
| Escamilla et al. [35] | Trained | 58 | 14–17 | ND | 3 groups (n = 43) | 1 group (n = 15) | Yes | 6 | Throwing velocity | The throwing velocity was measured using a precision-calibrated Jugs Tribar Sport radar gun, manufactured by Jugs Pitching Machine Company in Tualatin, Oregon, USA. Each participant commenced their throws from a starting line positioned 22.9 m away from a circular target with a diameter of 1.8 m. The center of this target was approximately at chest level, standing at a height of 1.30 m. |
| Kurland et al. [39] | Trained | 20 | 13–16 | Men | 1 group (N = 10) | 1 group (N = 10) | No | 6 | Throwing velocity | Not described |
| Lachowetz et al. [53] | Trained | 22 | 18–22 | ND | 1 group (N = 12) | 1 group (N = 10) | Yes | 8 | Throwing velocity | The assessment of throwing performance was conducted over a distance of 18.44 m, with velocity being measured using a sports radar gun. |
| Logan et al. [54] | Trained | 39 | ND | ND | 2 groups (n = 26) | 1 group (N = 13) | No | 6 | Throwing velocity | The players executed a series of 10 throws from a distance of 15 feet, and a velocitimer was employed to measure the throwing velocity. |
| Lust et al. [16] | Trained | 40 | 20.0 ± 1.5 | ND | 2 groups (n = 25) | 1 group (N = 15) | Yes | 6 | Throwing accuracy | It was employed the functional throwing-performance index. |
| McEvoy et al. [37] | National level | 18 | 24 ± 4 | Men | 1 group (N = 9) | 1 group (N = 9) | No | 10 | Throwing velocity | Throwing velocity was assessed over distances of 18.44 m using the ProSpeed Professional radar gun model from Decatur Electronics to measure the velocity. |
| Newton et al. [40] | Trained | 24 | 16–23 | Men | 2 groups (n = 16) | 1 group (N = 8) | Yes | 8 | Throwing velocity | Throwing velocity was assessed over distances of 18.44 m using the ProSpeed Professional radar gun model from Decatur Electronics to measure the velocity. |
| Potteiger et al. [55] | Trained | 21 | 19.6 ± 1.3 | Men | 1 group (n = ND) | 1 group (n = ND) | Yes | 10 | Throwing velocity | Throwing velocity was assessed using radar gun technique (RA-GUN G1, Decatur electronics). |
| Reinold et al. [32] | Trained | 38 | 15.3 ± 1.2 | ND | 1 group (n = 19) | 1 group (n = 19) | Yes | 6 | Throwing velocity; Injury rate |
They delivered 10 fastballs with a standard 5-ounce regulation baseball from a typical pitching mound. The velocity of each pitch was recorded using a radar gun (Stalker Radar). Injury rate was measured after the training program. |
| Wooden et al. [56] | Trained | 27 | 15.5 ± 1.0 | ND | 2 groups (n = ND) | 1 group (n = ND) | Yes | 5 | Throwing velocity | Throws executed at a distance of 60 feet were assessed using a calibrated radar gun, specifically the Magnum X Ban radar gun. |
| Yang et al. [33] | Trained | 38 | 15.3 ± 1.2 | ND | 1 group (n = 19) | 1 group (n = 19) | No | 6 | Throwing velocity; throwing accuracy | The measurement of throwing velocity entailed employing ten fastballs, each thrown with a standard 5-ounce regulation baseball, from a conventional pitching mound. The radar gun was utilized for the precise determination of the throwing speed. |
ND: not described.