Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 7;29(45):5962–5973. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i45.5962

Table 2.

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease according to the categories of muscle strength

Muscle strength
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Total
    Q1 3.63 (3.34–3.95) 3.24 (2.94–3.58) 1.92 (1.70–2.16)
    Q2–Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P value
    Q1 9.12 (7.98–10.41) 8.61 (7.41–10.01) 3.12 (2.64–3.69)
    Q2 4.92 (4.29–5.64) 4.75 (4.10–5.50) 2.19 (1.85–2.58)
    Q3 2.48 (2.17–2.84) 2.42 (2.10–2.78) 1.41 (1.22–1.65)
    Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Men
    Q1 3.51 (3.02–4.09) 3.31 (2.80–3.90) 2.05 (1.70–2.47)
    Q2–Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P value < 0.001 < 0.001
    Q1 7.30 (5.67–9.39) 7.20 (5.52–9.38) 2.88 (2.20–3.78)
    Q2 3.68 (2.83–4.78) 3.68 (2.82–4.80) 1.75 (1.32–2.31)
    Q3 2.02 (1.54–2.66) 2.03 (1.55–2.68) 1.23 (0.93–1.63)
    Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Women
    Q1 4.20 (3.74–4.71) 3.17 (2.79–3.60) 1.76 (1.47–2.10)
    Q2–Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    Q1 11.76 (9.87–14.02) 9.14 (7.56–11.05) 3.09 (2.43–3.92)
    Q2 6.09 (5.15–7.20) 5.30 (4.47–6.30) 2.52 (2.05–3.10)
    Q3 2.76 (2.34–3.26) 2.59 (2.20–3.06) 1.52 (1.25–1.85)
    Q4 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
    P for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis; Model 1 = not adjusted; Model 2 = adjusted for age, sex, income, education, smoking status, and physical activity; Model 3 = Model 2 + alanine aminotransferase, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Q: Quartile.