Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov;121:102546. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102546

Table 2.

Baseline and control group nutrient application rates, nutrient use efficiency, maize yield and GHG emissions, and recommended nutrient rates from extension treatment interventions.

Panel A: 2016–2017
Panel B: 2016–2018
C
T1
T2
C
T1
T2
2016 2017 2016 2016 2018 2016
Fertilizer management practices 0.300 0.268 0.302 0.269 0.285 0.267 0.267 0.291
(0.031) (0.03) (0.030) (0.029) (0.030) (0.03) (0.030) (0.031)
N rate (kg/ha) 62.19 74.88*** 57.77 58.77 62.13 68.05* 59.58 60.03
(3.22) (3.18) (3.10) (3.09) (3.19) (2.45) (3.33) (3.33)
Nutrient rate (kg/ha) 102.9 121.6*** 92.58 96.4 102.08 115.8** 94.73 99.04
(4.40) (5.40) (4.21) (4.43) (4.40) (3.97) (4.47) (5.06)
NUE (kg output/kg N) 66.48 41.91*** 63.59 68.82 65.73 39.55*** 60.66 69.09
(4.92) (2.10) (4.52) (4.63) (4.83) (66.08) (4.58) (4.79)
NuUE (kg output/kg nutrient) 34.02 25.55*** 34.80 35.18 34.01 23.38*** 32.56 35.61
(2.13) (1.217) (2.21) (2.13) (2.31) (0.898) (2.16) (2.20)
Yield (kg maize/ha) 2,118 2,202 2,010 2,085 2,127 2,243** 1,961 2,108
(64.07) (58.10) (59.09) (62.93) (61.07) (51.61) (60.08) (64.10)
Net revenue (NGN / ha) 147,342 127,257** 139,906 145,494 148,247 115,888*** 132,653 146,525
(7,398) (5,555) (6,886) (6,937) (7,082) (5,231) (6,949) (7,261)
GHG emission (kg CO2 eq./ha) 828.3 1,012*** 790.5 811.9 824.4 935.1*** 797.7 819.9
(34.69) (43.03) (33.56) (37.04) (34.74) (32.63) (35.45) (38.26)
GHG emission intensity (kg CO2 eq./ton maize) 502.5 507.4 516.7 488.2 473.0 437.9 525.6 478.4
(32.70) (24.96) (34.67) (35.56) (27.52) (14.27) (35.15) (31.34)
Recommended N application (kg/ha) 120 129.0*** 128.6*** 120 132.0*** 134.9***
(1.50) (1.29) (1.48) (1.64)
Recommended nutrient application (kg/ha) 240 241.6 234.8 240 250.9*** 247.1**
(4.66) (4.01) (3.76) (4.23)
Sub-sample size after attrition 220 220 240 230 221 221 225 220

Standard errors reported between parentheses. Significant mean differences between C 2016 - C 2017, C 2016 - C 2018, C-T1 and C-T2 indicated as 1% ***, 5% ** and 10% * significance levels.