Table 2.
Content validity results and suggestions from a two-round expert consultation
| No. | I-CVI (First round) | Suggestions from experts | I-CVI (Second round) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.89 | This item was similar to item No.2, and experts suggested to combine them. | - |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | 0.78 | This item was advised to combine with item No.9. | - |
| 4 | 0.78 | This item was irrelevant to the scale. | - |
| 5 | 0.67 | This item was irrelevant to the scale. | - |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | 1.00 | This item was similar to item No.11, and experts suggested to delete it. | - |
| 11 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | 1.00 | The words “every member in your team” was too absolutely. | 1.00 |
| 13 | 0.89 | This item was similar to item No.10 and No.11, and experts suggested to delete it. | - |
| 14 | 1.00 | This item was similar to item No.15 & 16, and experts suggested to combine them. | - |
| 15 | 0.89 | This item was similar to item No.14 & 16, and experts suggested to delete it. | - |
| 16 | 0.78 | Experts suggested to combine this item with item No.15 & 16 and revise it. | 0.89 |
Note: I-CVI, Item-Level Content Validity Index; S-CVI: Scale-Level Content Validity Index