Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 25;79(1):glad206. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad206

Table 3.

Cross-Sectional Associations of GDF-11, GDF-8, FST, and FSTL-3 With Cardiac Phenotypes (CHS Only)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
β* (95% CI) p β* (95% CI) p β* (95% CI) p β* (95% CI) p
LVLS
 GDF-11 0.58 (−0.77, 1.38) .436 0.68 (−0.67, 1.45) .32 0.49 (−0.91, 1.38) .57 0.59 (−0.85, 1.46) .47
 GDF-8 0.43 (−0.67, 1.11) .494 0.58 (−0.52, 1.21) .29 0.52 (−0.63, 1.19) .4 0.52 (−0.62, 1.2) .39
 FST 0.39 (−0.34, 0.81) .283 0.16 (−0.53, 0.66) .76 0.41 (−0.36, 0.84) .29 0.36 (−0.41, 0.81) .38
 FSTL-3 −1.37 (−1.81, −0.85) <.001 −1.32 (−1.78, −0.76) <.001 −0.77 (−1.38, 0.35) .14 −0.31 (−1.19, 0.95) .75
LVDSR
 GDF-11 0.06 (−0.13, 0.18) .631 0.08 (−0.12, 0.19) .479 0.1 (−0.11, 0.22) .38 0.12 (−0.09, 0.24) .25
 GDF-8 0.04 (−0.11, 0.15) .704 0.06 (−0.09, 0.16) .465 0.05 (−0.11, 0.15) .66 0.05 (−0.11, 0.16) .64
 FST 0.05 (−0.06, 0.11) .363 0.02 (−0.08, 0.09) .788 0.04 (−0.07, 0.11) .54 0.04 (−0.07, 0.11) .61
 FSTL-3 −0.17 (−0.24, −0.09) .001 −0.14 (−0.21, −0.03) .024 −0.05 (−0.16, 0.11) .61 0.05 (−0.14, 0.17) .74
LARS
 GDF-11 −2.03 (−4.34, 2.03) .327 −1.99 (−4.31, 2.06) .339 −2.31 (−4.72, 2) .28 −2.01 (−4.57, 2.37) .39
 GDF-8 0.91 (−2.28, 3.07) .681 0.91 (−2.29, 3.07) .682 0.51 (−2.62, 2.96) .87 0.65 (−2.57, 3.04) .81
 FST 0.9 (−1.3, 2.22) .469 1.1 (−1.13, 2.38) .334 0.72 (−1.54, 2.19) .63 0.55 (−1.67, 2.12) .74
 FSTL-3 −2.17 (−3.8, 0.81) .115 −2.11 (−3.83, 1.04) .15 0.99 (−2.39, 3.26) .67 1.76 (−2.26, 4.14) .42
Medial e’
 GDF-11 −0.05 (−0.45, 0.42) .929 −0.07 (−0.45, 0.41) .892 −0.07 (−0.48, 0.44) .9 0.05 (−0.45, 0.48) .94
 GDF-8 0.37 (0.05, 0.58) 0.037 0.34 (−0.05, 0.56) 0.064 0.37 (0.02, 0.59) 0.05 0.38 (0.05, 0.6) 0.04
 FST −0.24 (−0.38, −0.01) 0.047 −0.18 (−0.34, 0.11) 0.018 −0.17 (−0.34, 0.13) 0.24 −0.17 (−0.34, 0.14) 0.26
 FSTL-3 −0.46 (−0.64, −0.23) 0.002 −0.44 (−0.63, −0.19) 0.005 −0.31 (−0.55, 0.12) 0.12 0.04 (−0.41, 0.43) 0.95
E/e’
 GDF-11 −0.23 (−3.26, 3.16) .965 0.07 (−3.16, 3.18) .994 −0.68 (−3.58, 3.11) .85 −1.11 (−3.85, 2.92) .7
 GDF-8 −1.28 (−3.21, 1.9) .48 −0.84 (−2.91, 2.2) .698 −1.93 (−3.7, 1.3) .21 −2 (−3.77, 1.22) .19
 FST 1.6 (−0.37, 2.69) .081 1.07 (−1.07, 2.29) .327 1.26 (−0.91, 2.47) .23 1.13 (−1.08, 2.39) .31
 FSTL-3 4.16 (2.71, 5.41) <.001 3.58 (1.91, 4.94) .001 2.95 (0.73, 4.54) .02 1.84 (−1.95, 4.02) .35
ppLVM
 GDF-11 3.09 (−3.18, 6.69) 0.337 3.17 (−3.07, 6.72) 0.317 3.19 (−3.33, 6.93) 0.34 2.91 (−3.62, 6.75) 0.41
 GDF-8 −0.41 (−4.28, 4.08) 0.946 −1.28 (−4.69, 3.64) 0.723 0.58 (−4.24, 4.57) 0.92 0.76 (−4.18, 4.66) 0.88
 FST −2.64 (−4.27, −0.06) 0.049 −2.24 (−3.96, 0.93) 0.127 −2.67 (−4.43, 0.48) 0.07 −2.59 (−4.39, 0.66) 0.09
 FSTL-3 3.69 (−0.79, 6.19) 0.077 2.19 (−2.87, 5.2) 0.428 2.21 (−3.26, 5.53) 0.48 2.03 (−4.04, 5.93) 0.6
Ln NT-proBNP
 GDF-11 −0.02 (−0.23, 0.19) 0.827 −0.04 (−0.24, 0.16) 0.683 −0.14 (−0.34, 0.07) 0.193 −0.14 (−0.34, 0.05) 0.153
 GDF-8 −0.02 (−0.18, 0.14) .804 0.02 (−0.13, 0.17) .822 0.06 (−0.09, 0.21) .446 0.07 (−0.08, 0.22) .349
 FST 0.13 (0.04, 0.21) .004 0.09 (0.01, 0.17) .027 0.09 (0.01, 0.17) .036 0.09 (0.01, 0.17) .031
 FSTL-3 0.71 (0.57, 0.85) <.001 0.49 (0.35, 0.63) <.001 0.52 (0.36, 0.67) <.001 0.25 (0.07, 0.43) .007

Notes: Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, and race. Model 3: adjusted for Model 2 covariates plus body mass index, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, diabetes, current smoking, heavy alcohol use, FEV1, prevalent CHD, prevalent stroke, prevalent PAD, prevalent AF. Model 4: adjusted for Model 3 covariates plus eGFRcys. FST = follistatin; FSTL-3 = follistatin-like 3; LARS = left atrial reservoir strain; Ln = natural logarithm; LVDSR = left ventricular early-diastolic strain rate; LVLS = left ventricular longitudinal strain; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; ppLVM = percent predicted left ventricular mass.

*Per doubling.

To interpret β coefficients for natural-log transformed NT-proBNP, exponentiating of the coefficient gives the ratio of the geometric means of NT-proBNP associated with each doubling of the biomarker in question. For example, for the FST effect estimate in Model 4, e0.09 = 1.094, representing a 9.4% increase in NT-proBNP per doubling in FST. Similarly, for the FSTL-3 risk estimate in Model 4, e0.25 = 1.284, or a 28.4% increase in NT-proBNP, per doubling in FSTL-3.