Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2023 Dec 7;11:1286223. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1286223

Application and development of hydrogel biomaterials for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: a literature review

Yuheng Liu 1,, Zhen Zhao 1,, Chuan Guo 1, Zhangheng Huang 1, Weifei Zhang 1, Fei Ma 1, Zhe Wang 1, Qingquan Kong 1,*, Yu Wang 1,*
PMCID: PMC10733535  PMID: 38130952

Abstract

Low back pain caused by disc herniation and spinal stenosis imposes an enormous medical burden on society due to its high prevalence and refractory nature. This is mainly due to the long-term inflammation and degradation of the extracellular matrix in the process of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD), which manifests as loss of water in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and the formation of fibrous disc fissures. Biomaterial repair strategies involving hydrogels play an important role in the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Excellent biocompatibility, tunable mechanical properties, easy modification, injectability, and the ability to encapsulate drugs, cells, genes, etc. make hydrogels good candidates as scaffolds and cell/drug carriers for treating NP degeneration and other aspects of IVDD. This review first briefly describes the anatomy, pathology, and current treatments of IVDD, and then introduces different types of hydrogels and addresses “smart hydrogels”. Finally, we discuss the feasibility and prospects of using hydrogels to treat IVDD.

Keywords: hydrogel, intervertebral disc, degeneration, regeneration, stimulus response

1 Introduction

The intervertebral disc (IVD) is a connective structure located between two adjacent vertebrae of the spine, consisting of the nucleus pulposus (NP), the annulus fibrosus (AF), and the cartilaginous endplate (CEP), and its main function is to provide flexibility and stability for the spine (Shapiro et al., 2012). Due to its location, the IVD is also an important load-bearing organ.

The IVD is the largest avascular organ in the human body, with only a small amount of vascularization present in the cartilaginous endplates (CEPs) and the outer lamellae of the AF (Dowdell et al., 2017; Bermudez-Lekerika et al., 2022). Almost all exchanges of nutrients and waste products occur through CEP vascular infiltration and extracellular matrix diffusion (Fields et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2022). With age, degenerative changes such as ossification of the cartilage endplate decrease its permeability and blood supply, which exacerbates the hypoxic environment inside the IVD, mainly manifested by lactic acid accumulation and a decrease in ambient pH. These environmental factors accelerate cell death (Choi et al., 2018; Silagi et al., 2020). These age-related risk factors cumulatively lead to a greater susceptibility of the IVD to degenerative disease.

IVDD often causes low back pain as well as neck and upper back pain, accompanied by numbness of the upper and lower extremities (Wen et al., 2022). In severe cases, weakness of the limbs, and nerve damage symptoms can occur. Over time, these symptoms lead to a large number of patients with disabilities, of which low back pain is one of the most important public problems, and has a major impact on public health, resulting in a serious socioeconomic burden. As the population ages, low back pain and other diseases caused by intervertebral discs are receiving increasing attention (Samanta et al., 2023).

The intervertebral disc belongs to the fibrocartilage part of the “three-joint complex” (Oichi et al., 2020), which connects two adjacent vertebrae, maintains pressure, and provides flexibility for spinal activities. It also forms an anatomical structure, in combination with the upper and lower vertebral bodies, that protects the spinal cord nerves. As the intervertebral disc ages and the pressure on the intervertebral disc increases, it leads to herniation of the intervertebral disc and narrowing of the spinal canal, which causes the symptoms mentioned above.

The main factors causing intervertebral disc degeneration include the destruction of the extracellular matrix (ECM), changes in IVD cell phenotypes, and the progressive inflammatory response in the IVD (Rider et al., 2019). At present, the commonly used conservative treatment are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and analgesics, however the vast majority of patients need surgery to relieve symptoms, although the effect of surgery on patients with multisegment degeneration is not satisfactory (Xin et al., 2022). In addition, the recurrence rate after surgery is high, leading to problems such as degeneration of the adjacent segment IVD. Therefore, conventional conservative treatment and surgical treatment can be considered palliative treatments, which can relieve symptoms but not reverse the degeneration of the intervertebral disc and restore its function (Raj, 2008; Vasiliadis et al., 2014; van Uden et al., 2017; Xin et al., 2022). In recent years, cell therapy, drug therapy and gene therapy have been gradually used to treat degenerative intervertebral discs, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (Hu et al., 2020; Cunha et al., 2021) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (Nagae et al., 2007; Chai et al., 2023) have even entered clinical trials. However the delivery of these therapeutic factors to the intervertebral disc has not been widely put into clinical use due to the lack of high-quality clinical evidence (Kawabata et al., 2023). Prolonged inflammation within a degenerating disc can lead to a hostile ECM environment in which drugs and other bioactive agents are readily degraded. Therefore, it is important to find a material that can carry biological agents, protect them from in-situ degradation, and enable long-term release. Hydrogels are advantageous due to their high hydration properties (Ma et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021).

Materials used for intervertebral disc treatment should have high strength, high flexibility and high toughness (Wang et al., 2023a). Polymer hydrogels have a three-dimensional cross-linked network structure and adjustable physical and chemical properties (biocompatibility, biodegradability, material transport, and mechanical strength), which are conducive to cell adhesion and proliferation; therefore, they have been widely studied in relation to IVDD (Correa et al., 2021). Hydrogels can simulate the structure and mechanical properties of human tissue by changing the type, molecular weight, cross-linking degree, and other properties of the material, and can further load cells, drugs, growth factors, etc., thereby delivering cellular nutrients and releasing active drugs to promote the regeneration of degenerative NP (Ahmed, 2015; Correa et al., 2021). Physical or chemical cross-linking methods can also be used to adjust the swelling rate, degradation rate, biocompatibility and other properties of hydrogels to treat the corresponding diseases (Correa et al., 2021). Therefore, this article is intended to summarize the advantages of hydrogel materials, introduce various types of hydrogels, analyze the modification of different hydrogels to overcome existing limitations and discuss their clinical application prospects for IVDD treatment.

2 Degeneration of IVD

2.1 Biomechanical causes

IVDD is a common spinal disorder that occurs mainly after long-term mechanical stress and changes in biological environmental factors. Due to the physiological and anatomical position of the IVD, stress transmission is one of its main functions. Under normal circumstances, the IVD functions effectively in support and cushioning. However, when an organism is affected by various factors, the structure and function of the IVD tissue may undergo degeneration and injury (Figure 1) (Buckwalter, 1995; Urban and Roberts, 2003; Adams and Roughley, 2006; Sakai et al., 2012).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Biomechanical causes and biomolecular factors leading to IVDD.

Many studies have demonstrated that age is one of the main risk factors for IVDD (Wang et al., 2016; Ohnishi et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). With age, the water content of the IVD gradually decreases, and the water content of the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus decreases, reducing the elasticity and flexibility of the IVD (Rasekhi et al., 2006). In addition, as we age, the body produces less collagen and other important components, weakening the regenerative capacity of the IVD (Pokharna and Phillips, 1998; Roberts et al., 2006).

Poor lifestyle habits are also among the most important factors leading to IVDD. For example, maintaining the same position for long periods of time and incorrect posture can increase the load on the IVD, causing excessive stress and injury (Williams and Sambrook, 2011). Prolonged sitting, sedentary behavior and lack of exercise can lead to poor blood circulation in the discs and accelerate the degeneration process (Ding et al., 2021).

In addition, trauma and injury can cause degeneration. For example, sudden heavy pressure, sprains, or vibration in a long-term work environment can cause damage. Such injuries can dehydrate IVD tissue (Figure 1).

2.2 Biomolecular factors

During the onset of IVDD, the first thing that occurs is an imbalance in the synthesis and degradation of the extracellular matrix (Kirnaz et al., 2022; Mohd Isa et al., 2022). This changes the matrix composition of the IVD tissue. This may involve the uncoordinated action of a variety of regulatory molecules such as cytokines, growth factors, and degradative enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTs) (Le Maitre et al., 2006; Rutges et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Zhao and Li, 2021). This leads to a disruption of extracellular matrix catabolism and synthetic homeostasis (Figure 1).

On the other hand, degeneration of the IVD is also associated with sterile inflammation and oxidative stress. As the IVD is in a hypoxic environment, this results in metabolites not being excreted efficiently (Bartels et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2023b). The accumulation of harmful substances leads to inflammation, which affects cellular function. Oxidative stress is the result of an imbalance in redox dynamics, manifested by an increase in the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a relative decrease in the levels of antioxidants, which may compromise the integrity of cellular function (Cheng F. et al., 2022; Wang D. K. et al., 2022; Zhang C. Y. et al., 2022; Cao et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2022; Wen et al., 2022). It has also been shown that the accumulation of ROS is positively correlated with the degree of IVDD (Bai et al., 2020). During this process, IVD cell death is accelerated (Figure 1).

IVDD is also influenced by genetic factors (Siemionow et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2011; Mei et al., 2022). Multiple genes have been shown to correlate with disc degeneration, such as miR-21 (Wang Y. et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023a; Wang et al., 2023c) and COL9A2 (Xu et al., 2022). With advances in cellular molecular research, gene therapy for IVDs is gradually being developed. The application of RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR gene editing technologies has enabled a promising start for gene-targeted therapy for IVDD (Roh et al., 2021).

3 Hydrogel for the treatment of IVDD

Hydrogels are polymers with a three-dimensional mesh structure formed by cross-linking chains of hydrophilic macromolecules (Ahmed, 2015; Yan et al., 2021; Ho et al., 2022). As injectable biomaterials, hydrogels have strong therapeutic applications and have gained widespread attention in the study of IVDD (Figure 2). First, most hydrogels are biocompatible with biological tissues and do not cause significant immune reactions (Kharaziha et al., 2021; Bu et al., 2022). On the other hand, due to the high water content, hydrogel can provide a favorable moisture environment, which is conducive to the growth and activity of IVD cells (Francisco et al., 2014; Verhulsel et al., 2014; Sun Y. et al., 2016). The physical and chemical properties of hydrogels can be adjusted by adapting formulations and preparation methods to meet different application requirements (Billiet et al., 2012; Zhai et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015). Therefore, the structure and properties of hydrogels can be regulated by controlling the degree of cross-linking, pore structure and other parameters to achieve the desired functions and properties. In addition, bioactive substances (e.g., cytokines, drugs, etc.) can be added to hydrogels to exert biological functions, such as promoting tissue repair and regeneration (Chai et al., 2017; Kamoun et al., 2017). As the IVD is an avascular enclosed organ, hydrogels that are applied in IVDD treatment must be injectable, to allow minimally invasive implantation. As bioactive therapeutic factor delivery vectors, hydrogels must be biodegradable and microenvironment-responsive (Wang Y. et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023a; Wang et al., 2023c). All these requirements should be taken into consideration in the design of hydrogels for use in IVDD treatment. However, studies have revealed a number of potential problems that limit the application of hydrogels in IVDD treatment. Hydrogel injection may also cause mechanical damage to the IVD. More minimally invasive injections are a topic of intense interest for future research, and will requires hydrogels with a good ability to change from liquid to solid (Kaur and Murphy, 2023). This property is very favorable for the repair of IVDs, but, it also presents greater difficulty in cross-linking. A hydrogel that is poorly designed for cross-linking has low mechanical strength and susceptibility to deformation and rupture, limiting its use in certain applications (Baumgartner et al., 2021). Moreover, hydrogels have a certain water solubility, which is easily affected by ambient moisture, limiting their application in certain moist environments. Water solubility also limits the stability of hydrogels, which are easily affected by temperature, pH and other factors and need to be modified and protected appropriately (Woodard and Grunlan, 2018). To solve the abovementioned problems of injectable hydrogels, a variety of dynamically cross-linked hydrogels are being vigorously pursued. Next, we will list some commonly used hydrogel matrix materials and the application of intelligent environment-responsive hydrogels in IVDD repair.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Normal intervertebral disc, herniation, and treatments (Zheng and Du, 2021).

3.1 Skeleton materials for hydrogels

We have summarized the crosslinking mechanism as well as the advantages and disadvantages of hydrogels designed with different materials (both natural and synthetic) in recent years in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Cross-linking mechanisms and advantages and disadvantages of hydrogels designed in recent years using different substances.

Biomaterial components Year Crosslinking mechanism Main advantage Main shortage Reference
Chitosan/alginate 2023 polyelectrolyte complexation High water content, controlled mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility Stent system instability Ye et al. (2023)
Gelatin 2023 glutaraldehyde cross-linking Low immunogenicity, integrins can be introduced Unstated Yahia et al. (2023)
Glass/sodium 2023 calcium ion cross-linking High drug delivery efficiency, low degradation products, and it takes only a few minutes at room temperature to achieve complete curing Potential cytotoxicity Wu et al. (2023)
Fibrinogen 2023 Genipin cross-linking Good anti-inflammatory properties, highly biocompatible, it can be made and repaired precisely Unable to withstand the daily pressure load of human intervertebral discs, practical application in the clinic becomes difficult Wang et al. (2023e)
PEG/miRNA 2023 amino-yne click reaction This hydrogel has excellent mechanical strength, high plasticity, structural stability, and sustainable drug release Potential effects of miRNAs on target genes Wang et al. (2023a)
Poly(ethyleneglycol)/decellularized cell-derived matrix (dNCM) 2023 PEG-diurethane-dithiol crosslinker The hydrogel can assume a stiffness close to the intended target tissue within the disc, aiding biomechanical repair of the joint in a non-swollen state Potential impact on IVD cells in situ Schmitz et al. (2023)
Gelatin 2023 bioorthogonal Provides payload, reduces pain and promotes histological recovery Unstated Luo et al. (2023a)
Chitosan/PEG 2023 Schiff base reaction/photo-crosslink Delayed disc degeneration, biocompatible Difficulty in combining rapid gelation and increased physical stresses Huang et al. (2023b)
Hyaluronate 2023 Diels–Alder reaction This hydrogel exhibits favorable injectability, mechanical property, good antioxidant properties, pH-responsive delivery behavior, and inhibits inflammatory factors Mechanical properties still need more clinical testing Luo et al. (2023b)
Gelatin 2022 Schiff’s base reaction Good antimicrobial, antioxidant and mechanical properties. Minimally invasive injections are possible Unstated Yang et al. (2022b)
Peptide 2022 self-assembly High water content, injectable line, good biocompatibility, degradability Potential effects of cellular autophagy have not been ruled out Tang et al. (2022)
Poly (vinyl alcohol) 2022 glycerol cross-linking Reliable biosafety with gel properties similar to natural medulla oblongata, highly injectable The feasibility of clinical application requires further follow-up studies Jia et al. (2022b)
Alginate 2022 calcium ion cross-linking Better mechanical stability, excellent water-absorbent properties, promote cell repair and regeneration Unstated Li et al. (2023d)
Hyaluronate 2022 unstated Good physical properties and biocompatibility at the same time Tests use rat models with large gaps in human tissue, more research needed for clinical application Hu et al. (2022)
Poly(vinyl alcohol) 2022 unstated Low toxicity, good biocompatibility, high mechanical strength More research is still needed on materials with different weight percentages Heo and Park (2022)
polyethylene glycol fumarate/sodium methacrylate (OPF/SMA) 2022 situ formed Continuous anti-inflammatory repair and protection of the intervertebral disc Failure to fully simulate the microenvironment of intervertebral disc degeneration in the test Cheng et al. (2022b)
extracellular matrix 2021 situ formed Biocompatible, excellent small molecule drug delivery, ease of access to raw materials ECM enrichment and material preparation is difficult Xing et al. (2021)
Hyaluronan/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) 2021 situ formed Induction of endogenous cell recruitment; Recruitment of MSCs for vein transplantation; Promotion of IVD regeneration in IVD lesion patterns Further research is needed on the type of cells to be recruited and there is a potential effect on the time of measurement of the experimental metrics Cunha et al. (2021)
PEG/peptide 2021 situ formed Excellent bioactivity and substrate synthesis promoting function Inability to provide sufficient mechanical stress and difficulties with hydrogel injection Barcellona et al. (2021)
Gelatin 2021 situ formed Good cytocompatibility, excellent stability, mechanical properties, minimally invasive injections possible Poor nutrient availability in anoxic microenvironments Wang et al. (2021)
hyaluronic acid (HA)/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) 2021 Batroxobin(BTX) Promotes tissue repair and can provide an effective microenvironment for stem cells No simulation of effects on tissue cells under biomechanical stimulation Russo et al. (2021)

3.1.1 Natural polymers

There are many types of natural polymers that can be used as materials for hydrogels. Common natural polymers include proteins, polysaccharides, and peptides. These natural polymers can usually be extracted from naturally occurring substances (Chuah et al., 2017). These materials have desirable biocompatibility and biodegradability, but they also have certain defects, such as lacking the needed mechanical properties.

3.1.1.1 Chitosan

Chitosan is the product of N-deacetylation of chitin. It is often found in the shells of marine arthropods (Li et al., 2017). It is the second largest natural macromolecule and has various advantages characteristics such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, bacteriostasis, and nontoxicity, which has led to its widespread use in many fields, such as medical equipment and tissue engineering carrier materials (Bhattarai et al., 2010). Chitosan has excellent hydrophilicity and water absorption capacity because it contains a large number of hydroxyl groups and amino groups. Some studies have shown that adding β-glycerophosphate (BGP) to chitosan can cause it to gelate at normal physiological temperature (Chenite et al., 2000); based on this feature, chitosan can be injected into the desired area for in-situ gelation, but it has poor mechanical properties and long gelation time. To solve the problems of pure chitosan gels, chitosan is usually used as a material in composite hydrogels, such as chitosan, gelatin, glutaraldehyde and other materials to form a new hydrogel system. To achieve the needed mechanical strength and prepare pH-sensitive (Van der Schueren et al., 2013) or temperature-sensitive (Liu S. et al., 2021) hydrogels, chitosan can also be physically cross-linked with polyvinyl alcohol to form a conductive hydrogel system (Zhang et al., 2023). The recent literature has reported an injectable chitosan/PEG hydrogel, that rapidly undergoes gelation in situ by a Schiff base reaction, further enhanced by blue light irradiation, and can effectively promote the proliferation of NP cells(NPCs) for the repair of degenerative IVDs (Huang et al., 2023a).

3.1.1.2 Cellulose

Cellulose is the largest natural polymer and has good biocompatibility and adjustable mechanical properties. Its derivatives include carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (Zheng et al., 2015), methyl cellulose (MC) (Kim et al., 2018a), and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) (Hu et al., 2018), which have very good biocompatibility, biodegradability and water absorption performance. CMC has a highly negative charge similar to that of the NP. MC can undergo thermal gelation at temperatures above 32°C (Kim et al., 2018b). HPMC has the ability to perform controlled drug release. Injectable CMC-MC polymers can be fabricated by modifying both polymers with methacrylate groups, and the resulting gel can provide adequate mechanical support to restore disc height in injured IVDs (Varma et al., 2018). Cellulose is also often used as a component in composite hydrogels in current research, such as in double network hydrogels with alginate designed to increase the mechanical properties of the hydrogel system (Ho et al., 2023), Cellulose is also used as a component in composite hydrogels to replace the nucleus pulposus in the treatment of IVDD, for example, a poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate nanoprotofibrillated cellulose composite hydrogel was designed by Schmocker et al. to replace the NP tissue (Schmocker et al., 2016). As reported in the latest literature, an alternative scaffold for AF was made from alginate and cellulose with interstitial injection of cellulose solution to mimic the NP, and the resulting scaffold exhibits shape memory and is able to withstand compression and restore disc height. The scaffold carries MSC homing peptide (SKP peptide), cell adhesion peptide (RGD peptide), and GDF-5. SKP peptide recruits MSCs to the injury site, RGD peptide enhances cell attachment, and GDF-5 induces the differentiation of MSCs into NP-like cells and increases Col II and aggrecan synthesis, making this material a promising alternative to disc replacement (Ho et al., 2023).

3.1.1.3 Hyaluronic acid(HA)

HA is the most common material used to make hydrogel systems for IVD applications. HA is a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) that is ubiquitously present in the ECM and on cell surfaces (Mohd Isa et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2022). HA hydrogels have been shown to maintain tissue water content, suppress inflammation, reduce nociceptor expression, and mimic the tissue environment of IVD (Yang et al., 2022a). There are many ways to modify HA. For example, the introduction of thiol groups can result in controllable self-gelation. Hyaluronic acid methacrylate(HAMA) can be cross-linked by light, and the mechanical and biodegradable properties of hydrogel systems can be changed by varying the duration and intensity of light exposure (Eke et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2021). Because of its porous structure and high water content, HAMA can provide a suitable growth environment for NPCs and has promise for application in the treatment of IVDD (Shen et al., 2022). Derek et al. have also used HA and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) to form a thermoreversible hydrogel, which changes from liquid to gel when the temperature exceeds 30°C (Mortisen et al., 2010). Moreover, since HA acts as a ligand for CD44, a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in various biological functions, a corss-linked HA hydrogel can also enable NPCs to express higher levels of CD44, consequently attenuating cellular inflammation (Isa et al., 2015). J Shen et al. designed an injectable microsphere (MS@MCL) for local lactate exhaustion was constructed by grafting manganese dioxide (MnO2)-lactate oxidase (LOX) composite nanozyme on microfluidic hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA) microspheres via chemical bonds. The use of MS@MCL in NPCs culture exhibited excellent ROS clearance, reduced the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β, and increased the expression of Aggrecan and Col II, which effectively inhibited inflammation, promoted the regeneration of ECM, and showed long-term therapeutic effects on IVDD (Shen et al., 2022).

3.1.1.4 Alginate

Alginate is another natural material that can be used to synthesize hydrogels. It can cross-link under the action of divalent calcium ions, but the mechanical properties of the hydrogels produced are insufficient. Kalaf et al. had made changes to the cross-linking method, and generated a hydrogel with stronger mechanical properties and hydration, and a lower degradation rate (Growney Kalaf et al., 2017). In recent studies, alginate, like other natural polymers, has often been used as a components in composite hydrogels. For example, Sun, Z et al. used alginate as a hydrogel scaffold to load perfluorotributyl amine (PFTBA) as an oxygen regulator to treat IVDD (Sun Z. et al., 2016). Panebianco et al. used oxidized alginate to make microspheres and genipin-crosslinked fibrin to form a hydrogel system to deliver AF cells for IVDD treatment (Panebianco et al., 2022). The authors designed a composite material termed FibGen + MB-RGD that can effectively carry microencapsulated AF cells and eliminate the cytotoxicity of genipin. This material has high biomechanical stability and promotes ECM synthesis. Animal experiments have also proven that this material can restore the mechanical characteristics of the IVD after injury, prevent further IVDD, and promote ECM regeneration in the defect space.

Hydrogels made of a single natural polymer often have certain performance defects. For example, alginate hydrogels exhibit desirable porosity and hydrophilicity but poor cell affinity; pure fibrin hydrogels have good cell adhesion and biocompatibility but cannot achieve ideal mechanical strength for the treatment of intervertebral discs. Therefore, in the last 10 years, the abovementioned natural polymers have often been used as components in composite hydrogels, complementing the properties of other hydrogel components to improve drug delivery, cell delivery and other functions. In recent studies, these natural materials have often been modified (e.g., by methacrylation) to create new hydrogels or microspheres or have been combined with synthetic polymers, peptides, or other ingredients to create new materials with higher mechanical strength or environmental responsiveness. Basic materials with different characteristics, are chosen, modified, and combined to design specialized hydrogels with suitable properties for treating different diseases and different pathological environments and with the ability to deliver different therapeutic factors, such as drug molecules, proteins, and RNA. These specialized hydrogels will play important roles in the clinic.

3.1.2 Synthetic polymers

Despite the unique advantages of natural hydrogels in terms of biocompatibility and their use as extracellular matrices, their weak mechanical structure, their susceptibility to degradation in vivo and the uncontrolled molecular weight of the polymers at the time of extraction limit their application in hydrogels. Therefore, there is a need for polymers with precisely controlled molecular weights and compositions that can be reproducibly manufactured to exhibit specific mechanical properties, appropriate gelation behavior, and optimized drug/cell loading in the context of different disease treatment requirements. Synthetic polymers have emerged and in recent studies a variety of polymeric materials have been developed such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and polyacrylates.

3.1.2.1 PVA

PVA is a biodegradable semicrystalline synthetic polymer. It is often used in the pharmaceutical field to prepare solid dispersions to improve the solubility of drugs (Rivera-Hernández et al., 2021), and can also be made into granulating liquids to slow crystal growth (Gaaz et al., 2015). Because the mechanical structure of PVA is similar to that of cartilage, it can be used to make biomaterials to replace the nucleus pulposus. The earliest method of cross-linking PVA was through chemical cross-linking or freeze-drying, but chemical cross-linking often weakens the biocompatibility of hydrogels. The freeze-drying method leads to slow gelation, and polyphenol molecules are now often used to cross-link PVA into supramolecular hydrogels. Chen et al. designed a hydrogel with shape memory by using PVA to form multiple hydrogen bonds with TA (Chen et al., 2018). Esteban et al. induced PVA cross-linking through different small molecule polyphenols, and made thermally reversible hydrogels by exploiting the reversibility of hydrogen bonds (Euti et al., 2019). PVA hydrogels also provide controlled drug release, which is highly useful in monitoring the pharmacokinetics of the drugs carried (Chao et al., 2020). PVA, because of its desirable mechanical properties and controlled drug release, is not only a highly suitable alternative material for supporting the IVD but also an excellent long-term anti-inflammatory material for delivering drugs to degenerative IVDs.

In recently reported studies, PVA-containing hydrogels have typically been used to fabricate highly biocompatible materials to replace the NP and AF, allowing NPCs to proliferate within them (Binetti et al., 2014; Suryandaru et al., 2021; Jia et al., 2022a). Given the aforementioned characteristics of PVA, the use of PVA as a hydrogel component should be considered as a way to enhance the mechanical properties of hydrogels to better replace IVDs and provide slow drug release for the long-term treatment of IVDD.

3.1.2.2 PEG

PEG hydrogels have been widely used in the past for their excellent drug-carrying and cell-transporting capabilities, as well as their excellent biocompatibility (Nuttelman et al., 2008). The hydrogel formed by PEG “click” chemistry provides versatile options for bioconjugation and can form stable covalent bonds under the action of copper ions, and the resulting hydrogel has excellent mechanical properties (Kolb et al., 2001). PEG can also form light-responsive gels with diacetylene-functionalized allyl ester peptides (Polizzotti et al., 2008). Moreover, PEG hydrogels have the property of repelling nonspecific protein adsorption and cell adhesion, which prevents inflammatory cells from adhering to the surface of the hydrogel: thus, PEG hydrogels carrying drugs or specific proteins can specifically enable the desired cells to grow within them without being affected by inflammation, giving such hydrogel an important role in the treatment of IVDD (Csucs et al., 2003; Lin and Anseth, 2009).

In the most recent studies, PEG containing hydrogels have been used to carry genes or drugs for the treatment of IVDD (Chen et al., 2020) or synthesized with natural materials to construct replacement tissues for IVD (Huang et al., 2023a). As indicated by reports published in other fields, PEG also has advantages in the fabrication of phase change materials (Ma et al., 2023) and sensors (Yuan et al., 2023). Improving this feature and designing environmentally responsive hydrogels based on the environmental characteristics of IVDD could lead to a wider range of uses for PEG in the treatment of IVDD.

3.1.2.3 Polylactic-glycolic acid (PLGA)

PLGA is a hydrophobic polymer. The insertion of hydrophobic sequences such as PLGA into an otherwise hydrophilic hydrogel can achieve effects that are not possible with ordinary hydrogels, such as delivering hydrophobic drug molecules into the body (Makadia and Siegel, 2011). PLGA is widely used in the delivery of targeted drugs because of its unique biodegradability, adsorption, and high biocompatibility (Jin et al., 2021; Rahmani et al., 2023). Hydrogels containing PLGA have many applications in bone treatment. Glin et al. used PLGA-g-PEG to deliver hydroxyapatite (HAP) to treat bone defects (Lin et al., 2012), M. Zewail et al. used chitosan/β-GP hydrogels loaded with DEX/PLGA NPs and LEF/NLC hydrogel systems to promote joint healing (Zewail et al., 2021). J. Yang et al. utilized concentric ring arrangements of electrospun (ES) polycaprolactone (PCL)/poly (D,L-propylglycolide-ethylglycolide) (PLGA)/collagen compositions based on type I collagen(PPC) to make an AF replacement for IVDD treatment (Yang et al., 2017). The most commonly fabricated hydrogel containing PLGA is the temperature-responsive PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel. This hydrogel has unique advantages in delivering anti-inflammatory drugs into the IVD to treat IVDD and can provide mechanical support and anti-inflammatory effects at the same time after entering the IVD (Yan et al., 2015).

PLGA is currently used mostly as a component of temperature-sensitive hydrogels, as a simple drug delivery carrier, and in the form of microspheres to achieve controlled drug release. There is little research on PLGA-containing hydrogels (Chung et al., 2016; Sayiner et al., 2020). In the future, PLGA hydrogels microspheres designed for their ability to carry hydrophobic drugs can also be chemically or physically modified to improve their temperature sensitivity and thus their better in situ gel-forming ability, enabling broader use in treating IVDD.

3.1.2.4 Polyurethane (PU)

PU is composed of isocyanate and urethane groups polymerized with hydroxyl macromolecules as the basic repeating unit and has good abrasion resistance, toughness, and corrosion resistance (Liu Y. et al., 2021; Jiang R. et al., 2023), which are advantages in the production of biomaterials for replacing IVDs or AFs. J. Hu et al. developed a silk fibroin/polyurethane (SF/PU) hydrogel that is liquid or semiliquid prior to injection and undergose gelation in situ after injection into the intervertebral disc, forming a gel with outstanding mechanical properties as a prosthetic biomaterial for replacing the NP and enabling strong visualization on T2-weighted MRI images allowing it both to provide adequate mechanical support and can also be readily visualized during subsequent testing (Hu et al., 2012). In unconfined compression tests, the SF/PU hydrogel exhibited a nonlinear strain curve, showing a sharp increase in the compression modulus with increasing pressure. Rheological tests also revealed that the material possesses higher hardness and stronger elasticity than natural medullary tissue. Therefore, it can be used as a postsurgical disc filling material. In recent years, a small number of hydrogels made of PU have been used for the treatment of IVDD. However, composite hydrogels with PU as a component can have high mechanical strength and are suitable for replacing the AF and NP (Hu et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2017; Du et al., 2020). In other fields, composite hydrogels composed of PU are commonly used for drug delivery; accordingly, microspheres composed of PU can also be used for drug and cell delivery in the future treatment of IVDD, and hydrogels with large pores and high mechanical strength can be developed for the attachment and growth of NPCs (Hsieh and Hsu, 2019; Wang Q. et al., 2023).

In summary, although hydrogels consisting of artificially synthesized polymer materials have many advantages, such as stable and controllable molecular weight, mechanical properties that can be changed as needed, and variable affinity for carriers such as drugs, genes, and cells, their greatest disadvantage is difficult degradation, which limits their clinical application. Therefore, when designing future hydrogels containing synthetic polymers for IVDD therapy, it will be beneficial to modify them to form hydrogels or microspheres with strong mechanical properties and the ability to respond to environmental stimuli, which will be able to carry therapeutic factors such as drugs and cells and to undergo stimulus-responsive cleavage into small molecules to metabolize.

4 Stimuli-responsive hydrogels

In recent years, composite hydrogels designed to respond to specific stimuli to meet the needs of treating different diseases have attracted extensive attention due to their unique advantages. This type of hydrogel enters the lesion in a sol state, and can quickly form a gel or release loaded drugs under specific conditions such as light, temperature, pH and other stimuli. Stimuli are mainly categorized into physical stimulation, and chemical stimulation. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels have been widely used in drug delivery, gene delivery, cell delivery and other fields. For the treatment of IVDD, hydrogels should satisfy the following conditions: 1) they can provide sufficient mechanical support, 2) they are injectable, 3) they have a long-lasting anti-inflammatory effect and 4) they exhibit on-demand smart drug release. Therefore stimuli-responsive hydrogels have a wide range of applications in the treatment of IVDD.

4.1 Inflammation-responsive hydrogels (ROS and pH)

4.1.1 Inflammatory mediators as the basis of the response

Compared with the normal IVD, IVDD provides an inflammatory microenvironment characterized by local acidification and ROS accumulation. Hence, pH and ROS are natural triggers for drug delivery from smart hydrogels at inflammatory IVDD sites, and inflammation (pH/ROS)-responsive hydrogels may be one of the best candidates for IVDD regeneration. pH-responsive hydrogels are the most basic inflammation-responsive hydrogels, and the swelling process of such hydrogels usually relies on a change in the charge of the matrix (Ding et al., 2022). The mechanism of the response to inflammation is usually the ionization of polymer sidechains and the generation of electrostatic repulsive forces within the polymer network that cause the hydrogel to swell or shrink, and the degree of swelling changes with the pH (Oh et al., 2009). Alternatively, the response to inflammation can be achieved by inverse bonding. In an inflammatory environment, which is often accompanied by a decrease in the pH of the surrounding matrix, the pH-sensitive ligand bonds in the hydrogel will break resulting in rapid hydrogel liquefaction to achieve the release of the drug specifically in the inflammatory environment. Research by numerous researchers has produced, new inflammation-responsive hydrogels with strong sensitivity to pH and ROS. Hydrogels can be endowed with a wide range of functionalities by Schiff base bonding, borate bonding, disulfide bonding, etc., opening up possibilities for clinical applications.

4.1.2 Hydrogel design concept

Inflammation-response hydrogels are being updated with newer iterations (Hassanzadeh et al., 2019). Zhang et al. used polyacrylic acid (PAA) as the basis for a porous network of polymer hydrogels modified by chemical cross-linking with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and HA, which is useful in the field of wound healing (Zhang X. et al., 2022). Wang, Y et al. utilized the ability of phenylboronic acid (BA) to form reversible boron ester bonds with diol-carrying molecules, which exhibit pH and ROS sensitivity, to design new inflammation-responsive hydrogels by grafting BA onto gel and then grafting β-cyclodextrin (CD) and tannic acid (TA) onto the backbone, to deliver curcumin with miRNAs for the treatment of IVDD through a response to the pH in the degenerative IVD. Curcumin is released on demand in the IVD in response to pH for its anti-inflammatory effect, and the sustained release of the carried miRNA also promotes the regeneration of the ECM, which is very helpful for the treatment of IVDD (Wang Y. et al., 2022). With the gradual advancement of inflammation-responsive hydrogel research, ROS-responsive hydrogels have also been developed. C Liu et al. prepared inflammation-responsive hydrogels with ROS responsiveness by cross-linking borax-coupled aldehyde-modified chondroitin sulfate (Borax-ACS) with the ECM-derived component dopamine (DA)-functionalized gelatin (GelDA) carrying ROS-based glutaredoxin3 (GLRX3), thereby developing GLRX3+ mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vehicles (EVs-GLRX3), which treated IVDD by enhancing the cell antioxidant capacity. A diagram of the mechanism can be seen in Figure 3 (Liu et al., 2023). In addition to their drug-carrying function, hydrogels can perform various physiological functions through the grafting of additional chemical moieties. Q Zheng et al., synthesized the ROS-responsive polymer methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(propylene sulfide) (mPEG20-b-PPS30) carrying the peptide MR409, and when the resulting ROS-responsive hydrogel was injected into degenerative IVDs, it depleted some of the ROS and simultaneously released MR409 for anti-inflammatory purposes, which was shown to be effective in the treatment of IVDD (Zheng et al., 2021). Therefore, inflammation-responsive hydrogels are promising for application in IVDD, where long-term inflammation exists in degenerative IVDs, and long-term anti-inflammatory effects are achieved by the slow-release of drugs in response to pH.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Inhibition of ROS and regulation of redox homeostasis using ROS-responsive GDC@EVs-GLRX3 hydrogel delivery system for the treatment of IVDD (Liu et al., 2023)

4.1.3 Trends in research

In addition to medication, many biomaterials can be delivered by hydrogels; for example, microspheres can encapsulate cells, genes, and drugs to assist the regeneration of the ECM while exerting anti-inflammatory effects to promote the recovery of IVDs. Therefore, inflammation-responsive multiscale-based delivery systems have been developed as a promising strategy for the treatment of IVDD. However, more research is still needed on how to maintain a high loading rate, inflammatory responsiveness, and high biocompatibility at the same time.

4.2 Temperature sensitive hydrogels

4.2.1 Temperature sensitive hydrogel mechanisms

Temperature-responsive hydrogels undergo a phase transition at a critical temperature, which is often referred to as the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) or critical solution temperature (UCST). A common feature of temperature-sensitive hydrogels is the presence of hydrophobic groups, and there are two gel-forming processes, namely, sol-shrinkage and sol-gel transition. Most temperature-sensitive hydrogels are less water-soluble at elevated temperatures, and the polymer molecules shrink to form hydrogels at temperatures above the LCST. The polymer chains of such hydrogels usually contain a moderate amount of hydrophobic groups or a combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups. At low temperatures, hydrogen bonds formed between the hydrophilic molecules of the polymer chain and water molecules play a dominant role, so that the polymer solubility in water is higher. With increasing temperature, the role of hydrogen bonding is gradually weakened, and the interaction between the hydrophobic groups is enhanced, so the polymer undergoes shrinkage to form a hydrogel. This category is represented by poly(N-iso-propylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm). When the polymer chain is noncovalently cross-linked, a sol-gel transition occurs at the appropriate temperature, and the sol form occurs at higher temperatures. This category is represented by poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly (propylene oxide) (PPO) block copolymers forming PEO-PPO-PEO.The temperature-responsive hydrogels commonly used in IVDD preparation for drug delivery are hydrogels with an LCST (Suntornnond et al., 2016). Because this type of hydrogel is hydrophilic at temperatures lower than the critical temperature, it is liquid, which makes the hydrogel injectable. If the human body’s physiological temperature is higher than the critical temperature of the hydrogel, then when the hydrogels is injected into the IVD, the hydrophobicity of the hydrogel increases, and the hydrogel begins to “solidify”, providing mechanical support for the degrading IVD.

4.2.2 Temperature sensitive hydrogels in the treatment of IVDD

The most common temperature-responsive hydrogel used in recent years is the PLGA-PEG-PLGA (PPP) triblock copolymer hydrogel, which has been reported to be used to treat IVDD, e.g., Chen, Q, et al. used an injectable PPP hydrogel to deliver bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonist, for the treatment of IVDD (Chen et al., 2022). Pan et al. synthesized an aminated hyaluronic acid-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-gefitinib (AHA-g-PNIPAAm-gefitinib) hydrogel to deliver gefitinib for the treatment of IVDD (Pan et al., 2018). Both of the abovementioned drug-carrying temperature-responsive hydrogels showed the superiority of the temperature-responsive hydrogel for IVDD treatment. In addition, there are studies on the use of temperature-responsive hydrogels as an alternative to IVDs. Li, Z et al. synthesized a thermosensitive hydrogel with enhanced stabilization by the N-acetylation of glycol chitosan (GC), and the critical temperature could be adjusted according to the degree of acetylation and the concentration of the polymer within the range of 23°C–56°C. The results of the experiments demonstrated that this hydrogel has good biocompatibility and is able to provide adequate mechanical support for degenerative IVD sites in experimental animals and to maintain stability for a long period of time (Li et al., 2018). PNIPAAm is a material widely used in the design of temperature-sensitive hydrogels. C. Sammon and Prof. C.L. Le Maitre investigated a novel pNIPAM-DMAc-Laponite hydrogel system based on PNIPAAm. The system has excellent thermosensitivity and injectability and is able to promote the differentiation of MSCs into the NPC phenotype in a hypoxic environment without the need for additional differentiation factors. In subsequent experiments, the authors demonstrated that the ECM of MSCs cocultured with this hydrogel system showed significant increase in the content of type II collagen and chondroitin sulfate, as well as a similar increase in NPC markers, indicating that the system provides an effective and convenient strategy for the repair of IVDD (Thorpe et al., 2016).

In a recently reported paper, Y. Jiang et al. investigated a hydrogel delivery system consisting of sodium alginate (SA), poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAAm), and silicate ceramics (SC), carrying NPCs and Mg2+ (Jiang Y. et al., 2023). At human body temperature, pNIPAAm and SA form interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogels in situ in the presence of temperature and Ca2+ ions and encapsulate NPCs and Mg2+ (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 5, the hydrogel possesses excellent biocompatibility. Next, to determine the effect of Mg2+ on NPCs, two types of hydrogels containing Mg2+ and without Mg2+ were prepared, and as shown in Figure 5B, the presence of Mg2+ did not affect the proliferation of NPCs. The authors further explored the regenerative effect of NP ECM by coculturing NPCs and BMSCs loaded into hydrogels, and the increase in Col II and aggrecan promoted by hydrogels in the presence of Mg2+ can be seen in Figure 6. The results of 3D pellet culture and Safranin O and Toluidine Blue staining demonstrated that hydrogels carrying Mg2+ can effectively promote the synthesis of NP cellular stroma to achieve the repair of degenerative IVDs. It is worth mentioning that for the repair of degenerative IVDs, in addition to the need to promote the regeneration of the ECM, the anti-inflammatory effect is a point worth evaluating. In this study, the authors used IL-1β to mimic the inflammatory situation within NPCs, and as seen in Figure 7, the Mg2+-carrying hydrogel group was able to attenuate the inflammatory damage to the ECM and justify the above conclusion of promoting ECM regeneration. The hydrogel system delivers NPCs with Mg2+ into the degenerative NP for repair, which confirms that the system can effectively delay the degeneration of IVDs, and based on the ability of the hydrogel to form an IPN network under the action of temperature and Ca2+, it can provide excellent injectability and mechanical properties at the same time, which is an advance for therapeutic strategies for IVDD.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Schematic showing the composition of the injectable self-contained SA/PNIPAAm hydrogel, its working principle and functionality (Jiang Y. et al., 2023)

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

(A) (a) SEM of NP laden SfP4 hydrogel on day 5; (b) Live-cell counting and (c) 3D live/dead assays of NP laden SfP4 on day 1,3,5,7. (B) (a) The live/dead assays; (b) The live-cell counting; (c) The CCK-8 assays of NPCs on day 1,3,5 co-cultured with different hydrogels. (Scale bar, 200 µm) (Jiang Y. et al., 2023)

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

(A). Col II, Aggrecan expression and actin cytoskeleton of (a) NPCs and (b) BMSCs in different hydrogels detected by the immunofluorescence. (B) (a) Immunofluorescence staining for Col II (green), actin cytoskeleton (red), and cell nuclei (blue) of BMSCs 3D pellet cultures in different hydrogel; (b) H&E, Safranin O and Toluidine Blue staining of BMSCs 3D pellet sections (Jiang Y. et al., 2023)

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

(A) qRT-PCR; (B). Western bolts results of aggrecan, COL II, MMP13 and Adamts5 expressions for NPCs encapsulated in SfP4-Mg (+), SfP4-Mg (−), SfP4-Mg (+)/IL-1β and SfP4-Mg (−)/IL-1β hydrogels (***p < 0.001) (Jiang Y. et al., 2023)

4.2.3 Trends in research

Temperature-responsive hydrogels have great advantages in the treatment of IVDD due to their injectability, in-situ gelation ability, and rapid gelation when the LCST is reached. They can enter the IVD in a minimally invasive way to avoid secondary damage, while in situ gelation prevents leakage and provides mechanical support for the degenerative IVD. These properties provide great application prospects for the treatment of IVDD.

4.3 Enzyme-responsive hydrogels

4.3.1 Enzyme response mechanisms

Enzyme-responsive hydrogels typically contain amino acid side chains that can be covalently linked by enzymes to form peptides. The peptides can deform or degrade the structure of the hydrogel when catalyzed by specific enzymes. The hydrolysis products of peptides are amino acids; therefore, enzyme-responsive hydrogels containing peptides and their derivatives are widely used because of their high biocompatibility, low immunoreactivity, controlled degradation time, and potential as slow-release carriers (Gao et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022).

4.3.2 Enzyme-responsive hydrogels in the treatment of IVD

The earliest enzyme-responsive hydrogels were synthesized by Yui et al. from polyethylene glycol and deoxyglucose by sequential cross-linking reactions, and in vitro degradation was achieved by papain and dextranase (Kurisawa et al., 1997). The use of this type of hydrogel in the repair of IVDs has been reported. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is a common protease with detrimental effects in IVDs (Vo et al., 2013), as it contributes to the degradation of the ECM; thus enzyme-responsive hydrogels used to treat IVDD are usually designed to target MMP. A pH- and enzyme-responsive hydrogel called Col-JK1 was designed by Zheng et al. In degenerative IVDs, the acidic environment and high expression of MMP caused the hydrogel to degrade rapidly and release hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which inhibited the degeneration of myeloid cells and modulated the NF-κB signaling pathway to inhibit inflammation (Zheng et al., 2019). Marcos N et al. used PEG with laminin (LM) and the peptides IKVAV and AG73 to create a novel hydrogel that not only provided sufficient mechanical support for degenerative IVDs but also restored the juvenile myeloid phenotype to degenerative human myeloid cells, as seen in Figure 8. This hydrogel was able to increase the height of the injected IVD after 8 weeks, and the staining results were also able to show that the hydrogel loaded with cells resulted in protein expression in the NPs similar to that of the juvenile phenotype, which indicated effective repair of the degenerative IVDs. (Barcellona et al., 2020; Barcellona et al., 2021). Brian M et al. designed an NHPH system consisting of a self-assembled peptide hydrogel, MnO2, and growth differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5). The entire NHPH system has mechanical strength similar to that of IVDs, inhibits inflammation, and delivers slow-release growth factors that enhance chondrocyte differentiation, thereby promoting the regeneration of fibrocartilage tissue for the treatment of degenerative IVDs (Conley et al., 2023). In summary, the excellent and controllable specific degradation of enzyme-responsive hydrogels, as well as their effects on cellular behavior, can provide new solutions for the treatment of IVDs (Feng et al., 2018).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Application of enzyme responsive hydrogel in IVDD, histological assessments of the IVDs. (A) 20 μm thick tissue sections, stained via SafO/Fast Green/Haematoxylin. Scale bar is 500 μm. (B) At the eighth week post-injury timepoint, differences in protein expression levels between groups was apparent. Although protein expression in the cell-laden hydrogel condition appeared to resemble that of the naïve condition, morphological differences in cell distribution could still be observed. Scale bar is 250 μm (Barcellona et al., 2021)

4.3.3 Constraints and challenges

Enzyme-responsive hydrogels have been widely studied for their special properties of controlled drug release even under mild conditions. However, enzyme-responsive hydrogels must fulfill a number of criteria (Yan et al., 2021). First, a sufficient grafting rate of the enzyme reaction substrate in the hydrogel network needs to be achieved to accomplish the enzymatic reaction. Morevoer, the enzymatic reaction must cause significant changes in the hydrogel structure to accomplish drug release. Due to these limitations, enzyme-responsive hydrogel drug delivery systems are still in development. Developing efficient enzyme-responsive hydrogel drug delivery systems with better biocompatibility and degradability will be a challenge for future researchers.

4.4 Photosensitive hydrogel

4.4.1 Photosensitive hydrogel mechanisms

Photosensitive hydrogels have natural advantages as a tools for drug delivery. Compared to pH-sensitive hydrogels, whose sensitivity is limited by the migration rate of H+, and temperature-sensitive hydrogels, whose sensitivity is limited by the efficiency of thermal conductivity, photosensitive hydrogels allow easier and more rapid control. A common feature of photoresponsive hydrogels is the presence of photosensitive functional groups [e.g., (O-nitrobenzyl)] (Qiu and Park, 2001). The covalent linkage between the photosensitizing functional groups and the main chain of the hydrogel polymer is a key factor in the swelling and shrinkage of photoresponsive hydrogels without separation. This type of hydrogel has been widely used in tissue engineering. Common photo-sensitive hydrogels are categorized as UV-sensitive and visible light-sensitive hydrogels, and the photosensitive hydrogels reported in the literature for IVDD treatment are often UV-sensitive hydrogels. In 1989, A Mamada et al. introduced a leuco derivative molecule, bis(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl) (4-vinylphenyl)methyl leucocyanide, into the polymer network, In the first observation of the phototropic phase transition process in gels (Mamada et al., 1990), triphenylmethane derivatives dissociated under UV irradiation to produce triphenylmethyl cations, and as the number of ion pairs increased, the sol started to swell.

4.4.2 Photosensitive hydrogels in the treatment of IVDD

GelMA is a photoresponsive hydrogel currently receiving particular attention, and its precursor substance, gelatin, is a denatured collagen with lower antigenicity. Gelatin is modified by methacryloyl to obtain GelMA (Yue et al., 2015; Klotz et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018), which can be rapidly polymerized to form a gel under the action of ultraviolet light or photocuring agents and which is injectable and has controllable mechanical properties. Li et al. designed an injectable photocrosslinkable porous GelMA/serine protein glycidyl methacrylate (SilMA) hydrogel, in which MSCs were encapsulated, and they demonstrated that this hydrogel system could promote the M2 polarization of macrophages for anti-inflammatory treatment while delivering MSCs to promote cartilage repair (Li et al., 2023a). Theoretically, this hydrogel could also be applied in the treatment of IVDD. To enhance the anti-inflammatory effect of the hydrogel system, it is also possible to encapsulate drugs in GelMA, such as curcumin (Li X. et al., 2023). In recent studies, GelMA has been modified to carry drugs and cells for the treatment of IVDD. Y, Zhang et al. designed a porous HA-PEG/NAGA-GelMA hydrogel, with multiple hydrogen bonds, which endowed the hydrogel with excellent mechanical properties and was able to withstand the pressure of AF when performing AF repair (Zhang C. Y. et al., 2022). Y, Li et al. prepared fucoidan-functionalized gelatin methacryloyl microsphere(Fu@GelMA-MS) hydrogel microspheres, which were able to inhibit inflammation in the environment of IVDD and to reduce the inflammation of IVDD by activating nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (NRF2), inhibiting intracellular ROS and enhancing antioxidant enzymes to protect the ECM. The authors used a microfluidic device to integrate fucoidan into GelMA hydrogel microspheres to form the Fu@GelMA hydrogel system. The system was used to culture NPCs, and the results demonstrated excellent ability to promote cell proliferation with high biocompatibility, and fucoidan sustained release for 38 days, showing excellent controlled drug release. In a follow-up study, fucoidan was found to increase the gene expression and protein expression of three ECM-related genes, Aggrecan, Col II, and SOX9, demonstrating that fucoidan has a good ECM regeneration effect on NPCs. Simultaneous coculture of NPCs with Fu@GelMA in an inflammatory environment induced by IL-1β, showed that the system could resist ROS and increase the gene and protein expression of antioxidant enzymes (Nrf2, Ho-1, Sod1, etc.). In NPCs, the IVDD was successfully treated by combining anti-inflammatory effects and the promotion of ECM regeneration (Li et al., 2023c). H Xu et al. used GelMA and alginate to make photosensitive hydrogel microspheres carrying GDF-5 for the anti-inflammatory treatment of postoperative intervertebral discs. The mechanism diagram is shown in Figure 9. The drug-loaded microspheres were able to effectively stimulate the regeneration of ECM by NPCs (Xu et al., 2020). Thus, the light-responsive hydrogel is expected to be able to repair degenerative IVDs at multiple levels (AF replacement, anti-inflammatory, etc.) and can provide new ideas for the treatment of IVDD.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

(A) Diagram of the electro-assisted printing device for the preparation of GDF5-GMs. (B) Schematic diagram of GDF5-loaded GM formation. (C) rADSCs were cultivated on the microspheres. (D) Construction of DDD model mice and injection of GDF5-loaded GMs with rADSCs into the degenerative intervertebral disc. (E) (E1), (E2) The progress of DDD in degeneration and repair groups. (F) Coordination mechanism of the cells–GFs–GMs system (Xu et al., 2020).

4.4.3 Constraints and challenges

A main to be addressed in the future is how to develop photosensitive hydrogels that can respond to long wavelengths of light and energize the reaction with higher quantum efficiency. In the treatment of IVDD, the greater challenge is to develop photoreversible hydrogels. Most of the photosensitive hydrogels reported thus far have been photogelated in vitro and then injected into the IVD, and injectability is obtained at the expense of the mechanical properties of the hydrogel. Photosensitive hydrogels with photoreversibility will have a wider range of applications. Another issue that needs to be addressed is to improve the biocompatibility of photosensitive hydrogels, and a more in-depth evaluation of the intermediates and final products of the photothermal reaction, as well as its effects on proteins and genes, is needed.

4.5 Other stimuli-responsive hydrogels

4.5.1 Electro-sensitive hydrogel

Electrosensitive hydrogels are usually composed of polyelectrolytes, which are capable of contraction or expansion in the presence of an electric field. Therefore, by controlling parameters such as the current intensity, the time of action, and the direction of the electric field, it is possible to realize the control of local deformation of hydrogels at the anode and cathode (Tanaka et al., 1982; Garland et al., 2011). Hydrogel deformation is often used in the manufacture of artificial muscles (Fitzgerald et al., 2015) and has been used for controlled drug release. X Ying et al. designed electrosensitive hydrogel nanoparticles (ERHNPs) modified with angiopep-2 (ANG) and loaded with the antiepileptic drug phenytoin sodium (PHT). The ANG-PHT-ERHNP complex can easily transport the drug into the brain, and fast release can be achieved by the application of an electric field, decreasing the severity of seizure onset (Ying et al., 2014). To date, no electrically responsive hydrogels have been applied to the treatment of IVDD, but this stimuli-responsive hydrogel also has good therapeutic prospects for IVDD and can be combined with electrical stimulation for the repair of spinal cord injuries.

4.5.2 Pressure-responsive hydrogel

The idea that hydrogels may undergo pressure-induced phase transitions originates from thermodynamic calculations for uncharged hydrogels, which indicated that certain hydrogels can collapse at low pressures and swell at high pressures (Qiu and Park, 2012). This type of hydrogel is commonly used to fabricate heat-pressure sensors: for example, X Fu et al. proposed a stretchable and self-powered temperature‒pressure dual sensing i-skin based on thermogalvanic hydrogels (TGHs), which is helpful for fabricating the skin of intelligent robots (Fu et al., 2022). This type of hydrogel has not been used for the treatment of IVDD and is not applicable to the treatment of IVDD according to the literature reported thus far.

As is apparent from the above description of electrosensitive hydrogels as well as pressure-responsive hydrogels, electrosensitive hydrogels are more promising in the treatment of IVDD. The hydrogel has good injectability when not electrically stimulated, and when successfully introduced into the IVD, the hydrogel can be made to have sufficient mechanical properties by electrical stimulation to provide a space for the cells to grow and can release the therapeutic factors it carries for further treatment of the IVDD. In subsequent studies, the potential of pressure-responsive hydrogels in combination with other materials (e.g., microspheres) can be considered, as well as the consideration of other injectable sites that are pressure-responsive hydrogels with more controllable drug sustained-release properties.

5 Summary

In this review, we describe the development of materials for preparing hydrogels, from natural materials to synthetic polymer materials, focusing on the key role of stimuli-responsive hydrogels synthesized from different materials in IVDD treatment. IVDD is a disease caused by multiple factors, such as genetics, environment, and aging, but the full etiology is still unclear. Long-term inflammation and ECM degradation in IVDs are currently considered to be the key factors leading to IVDD. Hydrogel is a substance similar to ECM. After the onset of IVDD, the IVD is reduced in height and insufficiently supported. A suitable hydrogel can provide mechanical support for the degenerative IVD while guiding the regeneration of medullary tissue, and hydrogel-carried medications or stem cells can further promote the recovery of the IVD. Different types of stimuli-responsive hydrogels have excellent effects in the treatment of IVDD, although pressure-responsive hydrogels and electroresponsive hydrogels are not described in detail here. In the future, the design of hydrogels may be improved by a better understanding of the etiology and pathology of IVDD and by combining the latest materials and engineering technologies to enhance the repair of degenerative IVDs.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Figdraw for providing the production platform for Figure 1.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82202747, 82372447). Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023NSFSC1747, 2023NSFSC1746). Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2023HXBH077, 2023HXBH082), Science and Technology Major Project of Tibetan Autonomous Region of China (XZ202201ZD0001G).

Author contributions

YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. ZZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. CG: Data curation, Software, Writing–original draft. ZH: Data curation, Software, Writing–original draft. WZ: Data curation, Software, Writing–original draft. FM: Data curation, Software, Writing–original draft. ZW: Data curation, Software, Writing–original draft. QK: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing–review and editing, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. YW: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Adams M. A., Roughley P. J. (2006). What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31 (18), 2151–2161. 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J. Adv. Res. 6 (2), 105–121. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai Z., Liu W., He D., Wang Y., Yi W., Luo C., et al. (2020). Protective effects of autophagy and NFE2L2 on reactive oxygen species-induced pyroptosis of human nucleus pulposus cells. Aging 12 (8), 7534–7548. 10.18632/aging.103109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barcellona M. N., Speer J. E., Fearing B. V., Jing L., Pathak A., Gupta M. C., et al. (2020). Control of adhesive ligand density for modulation of nucleus pulposus cell phenotype. Biomaterials 250, 120057. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barcellona M. N., Speer J. E., Jing L., Patil D. S., Gupta M. C., Buchowski J. M., et al. (2021). Bioactive in situ crosslinkable polymer-peptide hydrogel for cell delivery to the intervertebral disc in a rat model. Acta Biomater. 131, 117–127. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartels E. M., Fairbank J. C., Winlove C. P., Urban J. P. (1998). Oxygen and lactate concentrations measured in vivo in the intervertebral discs of patients with scoliosis and back pain. Spine 23 (1), 1–7. discussion 8. 10.1097/00007632-199801010-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumgartner L., Wuertz-Kozak K., Le Maitre C. L., Wignall F., Richardson S. M., Hoyland J., et al. (2021). Multiscale regulation of the intervertebral disc: achievements in experimental, in silico, and regenerative research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2), 703. 10.3390/ijms22020703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bermudez-Lekerika P., Crump K. B., Tseranidou S., Nüesch A., Kanelis E., Alminnawi A., et al. (2022). Immuno-modulatory effects of intervertebral disc cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 924692. 10.3389/fcell.2022.924692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhattarai N., Gunn J., Zhang M. (2010). Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv. drug Deliv. Rev. 62 (1), 83–99. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Billiet T., Vandenhaute M., Schelfhout J., Van Vlierberghe S., Dubruel P. (2012). A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33 (26), 6020–6041. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Binetti V. R., Fussell G. W., Lowman A. M. (2014). Evaluation of two chemical crosslinking methods of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for injectable nucleus pulposus replacement. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 (19). 10.1002/app.40843 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bu W., Wu Y., Ghaemmaghami A. M., Sun H., Mata A. (2022). Rational design of hydrogels for immunomodulation. Regen. Biomater. 9, rbac009. 10.1093/rb/rbac009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buckwalter J. A. (1995). Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20 (11), 1307–1314. 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao G., Yang S., Cao J., Tan Z., Wu L., Dong F., et al. (2022). The role of oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 1–16. 10.1155/2022/2166817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chai Q., Jiao Y., Yu X. (2017). Hydrogels for biomedical applications: their characteristics and the mechanisms behind them. Gels (Basel, Switz. 3 (1), 6. 10.3390/gels3010006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chai Q., Zhang B., Da Y., Wang W., Gao Y., Yao M., et al. (2023). Enhancement and repair of degenerative intervertebral disc in rats using platelet-rich plasma/ferulic acid hydrogel. Cartilage 14 (4), 506–515. 10.1177/19476035231157341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chao Y., Chen Q., Liu Z. (2020). Smart injectable hydrogels for cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2), 1902785. 10.1002/adfm.201902785 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen J., Yang J., Wang L., Zhang X., Heng B. C., Wang D.-A., et al. (2021). Modified hyaluronic acid hydrogels with chemical groups that facilitate adhesion to host tissues enhance cartilage regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 6 (6), 1689–1698. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen Q., Wang J., Xia Q., Wu L., Chen F., Li L., et al. (2022). Treatment outcomes of injectable thermosensitive hydrogel containing bevacizumab in intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 976706. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.976706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen W., Chen H., Zheng D., Zhang H., Deng L., Cui W., et al. (2020). Gene‐hydrogel microenvironment regulates extracellular matrix metabolism balance in nucleus pulposus. Adv. Sci. 7 (1), 1902099. 10.1002/advs.201902099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen Y. N., Jiao C., Zhao Y., Zhang J., Wang H. (2018). Self-assembled polyvinyl alcohol-tannic acid hydrogels with diverse microstructures and good mechanical properties. ACS Omega 3 (9), 11788–11795. 10.1021/acsomega.8b02041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng F., Yang H., Cheng Y., Liu Y., Hai Y., Zhang Y. (2022a). The role of oxidative stress in intervertebral disc cellular senescence. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 1038171. 10.3389/fendo.2022.1038171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheng H., Guo Q., Zhao H., Liu K., Kang H., Gao F., et al. (2022b). An injectable hydrogel scaffold loaded with dual-drug/sustained-release PLGA microspheres for the regulation of macrophage polarization in the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (1), 390. 10.3390/ijms24010390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chenite A., Chaput C., Wang D., Combes C., Buschmann M., Hoemann C., et al. (2000). Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ . Biomaterials 21 (21), 2155–2161. 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00116-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi H., Tessier S., Silagi E. S., Kyada R., Yousefi F., Pleshko N., et al. (2018). A novel mouse model of intervertebral disc degeneration shows altered cell fate and matrix homeostasis. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 70, 102–122. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chuah Y., Peck Y., Lau J., Hee H., Wang D. (2017). Hydrogel based cartilaginous tissue regeneration: recent insights and technologies. Biomater. Sci. 5, 613–631. 10.1039/c6bm00863a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chung T.-W., Chou T.-H., Wu K.-Y. (2016). Gelatin/PLGA hydrogel films and their delivery of hydrophobic drugs. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 60, 8–14. 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Conley B. M., Yang L., Bhujel B., Luo J., Han I., Lee K.-B. (2023). Development of a nanohybrid peptide hydrogel for enhanced intervertebral disc repair and regeneration. ACS Nano 17 (4), 3750–3764. 10.1021/acsnano.2c11441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Correa S., Grosskopf A. K., Lopez Hernandez H., Chan D., Yu A. C., Stapleton L. M., et al. (2021). Translational applications of hydrogels. Chem. Rev. 121 (18), 11385–11457. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Csucs G., Michel R., Lussi J. W., Textor M., Danuser G. (2003). Microcontact printing of novel co-polymers in combination with proteins for cell-biological applications. Biomaterials 24 (10), 1713–1720. 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00568-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cunha C., Leite Pereira C., Ferreira J. R., Ribeiro-Machado C., Grad S., Santos S. G., et al. (2021). Therapeutic strategies for IVD regeneration through hyaluronan/SDF-1-based hydrogel and intravenous administration of MSCs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (17), 9609. 10.3390/ijms22179609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ding H., Tan P., Fu S., Tian X., Zhang H., Ma X., et al. (2022). Preparation and application of pH-responsive drug delivery systems. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 348, 206–238. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ding S. L., Zhang T. W., Zhang Q. C., Ding W., Li Z. F., Han G. J., et al. (2021). Excessive mechanical strain accelerates intervertebral disc degeneration by disrupting intrinsic circadian rhythm. Exp. Mol. Med. 53 (12), 1911–1923. 10.1038/s12276-021-00716-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dowdell J., Erwin M., Choma T., Vaccaro A., Iatridis J., Cho S. K. (2017). Intervertebral disk degeneration and repair. Neurosurgery 80 (3), S46–s54. 10.1093/neuros/nyw078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Du J., Long R., Nakai T., Sakai D., Benneker L. M., Zhou G., et al. (2020). Functional cell phenotype induction with TGF-β1 and collagen-polyurethane scaffold for annulus fibrosus rupture repair. Eur. cells Mater. 39, 1–17. 10.22203/eCM.v039a01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eke G., Mangir N., Hasirci N., MacNeil S., Hasirci V. (2017). Development of a UV crosslinked biodegradable hydrogel containing adipose derived stem cells to promote vascularization for skin wounds and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 129, 188–198. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Euti E. M., Wolfel A., Picchio M. L., Romero M. R., Martinelli M., Minari R. J., et al. (2019). Controlled thermoreversible formation of supramolecular hydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and natural phenolic compounds. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 40 (18), 1900217. 10.1002/marc.201900217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Feng G., Zha Z., Huang Y., Li J., Wang Y., Ke W., et al. (2018). Sustained and bioresponsive two‐stage delivery of therapeutic miRNA via polyplex micelle‐loaded injectable hydrogels for inhibition of intervertebral disc fibrosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7 (21), 1800623. 10.1002/adhm.201800623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fields A. J., Ballatori A., Liebenberg E. C., Lotz J. C. (2018). Contribution of the endplates to disc degeneration. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 4 (4), 151–160. 10.1007/s40610-018-0105-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fitzgerald M. M., Bootsma K., Berberich J. A., Sparks J. L. (2015). Tunable stress relaxation behavior of an alginate-polyacrylamide hydrogel: comparison with muscle tissue. Biomacromolecules 16 (5), 1497–1505. 10.1021/bm501845j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Francisco A. T., Hwang P. Y., Jeong C. G., Jing L., Chen J., Setton L. A. (2014). Photocrosslinkable laminin-functionalized polyethylene glycol hydrogel for intervertebral disc regeneration. Acta biomater. 10 (3), 1102–1111. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fu X., Zhuang Z., Zhao Y., Liu B., Liao Y., Yu Z., et al. (2022). Stretchable and self-powered temperature–pressure dual sensing ionic skins based on thermogalvanic hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 (39), 44792–44798. 10.1021/acsami.2c11124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gaaz T. S., Sulong A. B., Akhtar M. N., Kadhum A. A. H., Mohamad A. B., Al-Amiery A. A. (2015). Properties and applications of polyvinyl alcohol, halloysite nanotubes and their nanocomposites. Molecules 20 (12), 22833–22847. 10.3390/molecules201219884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao X.-d., Zhang X.-b., Zhang R.-h., Yu D.-c., Chen X.-y., Hu Y.-c., et al. (2022). Aggressive strategies for regenerating intervertebral discs: stimulus-responsive composite hydrogels from single to multiscale delivery systems. J. Mater. Chem. B 10 (30), 5696–5722. 10.1039/d2tb01066f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Garland M. J., Singh T. R. R., Woolfson A. D., Donnelly R. F. (2011). Electrically enhanced solute permeation across poly (ethylene glycol)–crosslinked poly (methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic acid) hydrogels: effect of hydrogel crosslink density and ionic conductivity. Int. J. Pharm. 406 (1-2), 91–98. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Growney Kalaf E. A., Pendyala M., Bledsoe J. G., Sell S. A. (2017). Characterization and restoration of degenerated IVD function with an injectable, in situ gelling alginate hydrogel: an in vitro and ex vivo study. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 72, 229–240. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guo W., Douma L., Hu M. H., Eglin D., Alini M., Šećerović A., et al. (2022). Hyaluronic acid-based interpenetrating network hydrogel as a cell carrier for nucleus pulposus repair. Carbohydr. Polym. 277, 118828. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hassanzadeh P., Atyabi F., Dinarvand R. (2019). The significance of artificial intelligence in drug delivery system design. Adv. drug Deliv. Rev. 151, 169–190. 10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Heo M., Park S. (2022). Biphasic properties of PVAH (polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel) reflecting biomechanical behavior of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Mater. (Basel, Switz. 15 (3), 1125. 10.3390/ma15031125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ho C.-Y., Wang C.-C., Wu T.-C., Kuan C.-H., Liu Y.-C., Wang T.-W. (2023). Peptide-functionalized double network hydrogel with compressible shape memory effect for intervertebral disc regeneration. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 8 (2), e10447. 10.1002/btm2.10447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ho T. C., Chang C. C., Chan H. P., Chung T. W., Shu C. W., Chuang K. P., et al. (2022). Hydrogels: properties and applications in biomedicine. Mol. (Basel, Switz. 27 (9), 2902. 10.3390/molecules27092902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hsieh C.-T., Hsu S.-h. (2019). Double-network polyurethane-gelatin hydrogel with tunable modulus for high-resolution 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl. Mater. interfaces 11 (36), 32746–32757. 10.1021/acsami.9b10784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hu A., Xing R., Jiang L., Li Z., Liu P., Wang H., et al. (2020). Thermosensitive hydrogels loaded with human‐induced pluripotent stem cells overexpressing growth differentiation factor‐5 ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomaterials 108 (5), 2005–2016. 10.1002/jbm.b.34541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hu J., Chen B., Guo F., Du J., Gu P., Lin X., et al. (2012). Injectable silk fibroin/polyurethane composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 23, 711–722. 10.1007/s10856-011-4533-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hu J., Li C., Jin S., Ye Y., Fang Y., Xu P., et al. (2022). Salvianolic acid B combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells piggybacked on HAMA hydrogel re-transplantation improves intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 950625. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.950625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hu J., Lu Y., Cai L., Owusu-Ansah K. G., Xu G., Han F., et al. (2017). Functional compressive mechanics and tissue biocompatibility of an injectable SF/PU hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 2347. 10.1038/s41598-017-02497-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hu Y., Zhang S., Han D., Ding Z., Zeng S., Xiao X. (2018). Construction and evaluation of the hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose-sodium alginate composite hydrogel system for sustained drug release. J. Polym. Res. 25, 148–212. 10.1007/s10965-018-1546-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang L., Wang W., Xian Y., Liu L., Fan J., Liu H., et al. (2023a). Rapidly in situ forming an injectable Chitosan/PEG hydrogel for intervertebral disc repair. Mater. Today Bio 22, 100752. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang L., Wang W., Xian Y., Liu L., Fan J., Liu H., et al. (2023b). Rapidly in situ forming an injectable Chitosan/PEG hydrogel for intervertebral disc repair. Bio 22, 100752. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Isa I. L. M., Srivastava A., Tiernan D., Owens P., Rooney P., Dockery P., et al. (2015). Hyaluronic acid based hydrogels attenuate inflammatory receptors and neurotrophins in interleukin-1β induced inflammation model of nucleus pulposus cells. Biomacromolecules 16 (6), 1714–1725. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jia H., Lin X., Wang D., Wang J., Shang Q., He X., et al. (2022a). Injectable hydrogel with nucleus pulposus-matched viscoelastic property prevents intervertebral disc degeneration. J. Orthop. Transl. 33, 162–173. 10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jia H., Lin X., Wang D., Wang J., Shang Q., He X., et al. (2022b). Injectable hydrogel with nucleus pulposus-matched viscoelastic property prevents intervertebral disc degeneration. J. Orthop. Transl. 33, 162–173. 10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jiang R., Zheng X., Zhu S., Li W., Zhang H., Liu Z., et al. (2023a). Recent advances in functional polyurethane chemistry: from structural design to applications. ChemistrySelect 8 (11), e202204132. 10.1002/slct.202204132 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jiang Y., Wang J., Sun D., Liu Z., Qi L., Du M., et al. (2023b). A hydrogel reservoir as a self-contained nucleus pulposus cell delivery vehicle for immunoregulation and repair of degenerated intervertebral disc. Acta Biomater. 170, 303–317. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jin S., Xia X., Huang J., Yuan C., Zuo Y., Li Y., et al. (2021). Recent advances in PLGA-based biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. Acta biomater. 127, 56–79. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kamoun E. A., Kenawy E. S., Chen X. (2017). A review on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings. J. Adv. Res. 8 (3), 217–233. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kaur K., Murphy C. M. (2023). Advances in the development of nano-engineered mechanically robust hydrogels for minimally invasive treatment of bone defects. Gels (Basel, Switz. 9 (10), 809. 10.3390/gels9100809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kawabata S., Akeda K., Yamada J., Takegami N., Fujiwara T., Fujita N., et al. (2023). Advances in platelet-rich plasma treatment for spinal diseases: a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (8), 7677. 10.3390/ijms24087677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kharaziha M., Baidya A., Annabi N. (2021). Rational design of immunomodulatory hydrogels for chronic wound healing. Adv. Mater. Deerf. Beach, Fla.) 33 (39), e2100176. 10.1002/adma.202100176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kim J. H., Ham C. H., Kwon W. K. (2022). Current knowledge and future therapeutic prospects in symptomatic intervertebral disc degeneration. Yonsei Med. J. 63 (3), 199–210. 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.3.199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kim M. H., Kim B. S., Park H., Lee J., Park W. H. (2018a). Injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles for bone regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109, 57–64. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim M. H., Park H., Park W. H. (2018b). Effect of pH and precursor salts on in situ formation of calcium phosphate nanoparticles in methylcellulose hydrogel. Carbohydr. Polym. 191, 176–182. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kirnaz S., Capadona C., Wong T., Goldberg J. L., Medary B., Sommer F., et al. (2022). Fundamentals of intervertebral disc degeneration. World Neurosurg. 157, 264–273. 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Klotz B. J., Gawlitta D., Rosenberg A. J., Malda J., Melchels F. P. (2016). Gelatin-methacryloyl hydrogels: towards biofabrication-based tissue repair. Trends Biotechnol. 34 (5), 394–407. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kolb H. C., Finn M., Sharpless K. B. (2001). Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (11), 2004–2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kurisawa M., Terano M., Yui N. (1997). Double-stimuli-responsive degradation of hydrogels consisting of oligopeptide-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) and dextran with an interpenetrating polymer network. J. Biomaterials Sci. 8, 691–708. 10.1163/156856297x00506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Le Maitre C. L., Freemont A. J., Hoyland J. A. (2006). Human disc degeneration is associated with increased MMP 7 expression. Biotech. Histochem. official Publ. Biol. Stain Comm. 81 (4-6), 125–131. 10.1080/10520290601005298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li L., Wang Y., Pan L., Shi Y., Cheng W., Shi Y., et al. (2015). A nanostructured conductive hydrogels-based biosensor platform for human metabolite detection. Nano Lett. 15 (2), 1146–1151. 10.1021/nl504217p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li M., Wu Y., Li H., Tan C., Ma S., Gong J., et al. (2023d). Nanofiber reinforced alginate hydrogel for leak-proof delivery and higher stress loading in nucleus pulposus. Carbohydr. Polym. 299, 120193. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Li X., He L., Li N., He D. (2023b). Curcumin loaded hydrogel with anti-inflammatory activity to promote cartilage regeneration in immunocompetent animals. Polym. Ed. 34 (2), 200–216. 10.1080/09205063.2022.2113290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Li Y., Gao L., Meng C. (2022). The order of degeneration of lumbar intervertebral disc and lumbar facet joint and its correlation with age. Minerva medica 113 (2), 359–361. 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07610-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Li Y., Tian X., He W., Jin C., Yang C., Pan Z., et al. (2023c). Fucoidan-functionalized gelatin methacryloyl microspheres ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration by restoring redox and matrix homeostasis of nucleus pulposus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 250, 126166. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Li Y., Wang X., Wei Y., Tao L. (2017). Chitosan-based self-healing hydrogel for bioapplications. Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (11), 2053–2057. 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Li Y., Zhang J., Wang C., Jiang Z., Lai K., Wang Y., et al. (2023a). Porous composite hydrogels with improved MSC survival for robust epithelial sealing around implants and M2 macrophage polarization. Acta Biomater. 157, 108–123. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Li Z., Shim H., Cho M. O., Cho I. S., Lee J. H., Kang S.-W., et al. (2018). Thermo-sensitive injectable glycol chitosan-based hydrogel for treatment of degenerative disc disease. Carbohydr. Polym. 184, 342–353. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lin C.-C., Anseth K. S. (2009). PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharm. Res. 26, 631–643. 10.1007/s11095-008-9801-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lin G., Cosimbescu L., Karin N. J., Tarasevich B. J. (2012). Injectable and thermosensitive PLGA-g-PEG hydrogels containing hydroxyapatite: preparation, characterization and in vitro release behavior. Biomed. Mater. 7 (2), 024107. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/2/024107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Liu C., Fan L., Guan M., Zheng Q., Jin J., Kang X., et al. (2023). A redox homeostasis modulatory hydrogel with GLRX3+ extracellular vesicles attenuates disc degeneration by suppressing nucleus pulposus cell senescence. ACS Nano 17, 13441–13460. 10.1021/acsnano.3c01713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu S., Liu Z., Wu M., Xu X., Huang F., Zhang L., et al. (2021a). NIR as a “trigger switch” for rapid phase change, on-demand release, and photothermal synergistic antibacterial treatment with chitosan-based temperature-sensitive hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 191, 344–358. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Liu Y., Zhang Z., Wang J., Xie T., Sun L., Yang K., et al. (2021b). Renewable tannic acid based self-healing polyurethane with dynamic phenol-carbamate network: simultaneously showing robust mechanical properties, reprocessing ability and shape memory. Polymer 228, 123860. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Luo H., Wang Z., He Z., Ling Z., Wang H., Zhu J., et al. (2023b). Injectable chondroitin sulfate-grafted self-antioxidant hydrogels ameliorate nucleus pulposus degeneration against overactive inflammation. Biomaterials Sci. 11 (10), 3629–3644. 10.1039/d3bm00359k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Luo J., Darai A., Pongkulapa T., Conley B., Yang L., Han I., et al. (2023a). Injectable bioorthogonal hydrogel (BIOGEL) accelerates tissue regeneration in degenerated intervertebral discs. Bioact. Mater. 23, 551–562. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ma K., Chen S., Li Z., Deng X., Huang D., Xiong L., et al. (2019). Mechanisms of endogenous repair failure during intervertebral disc degeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 27 (1), 41–48. 10.1016/j.joca.2018.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ma Y., Zou M., Chen W., Luo W., Hu X., Xiao S., et al. (2023). A structured phase change material integrated by MXene/AgNWs modified dual-network and polyethylene glycol for energy storage and thermal management. Appl. Energy 349, 121658. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121658 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Makadia H. K., Siegel S. J. (2011). Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers 3 (3), 1377–1397. 10.3390/polym3031377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mamada A., Tanaka T., Kungwatchakun D., Irie M. (1990). Photoinduced phase transition of gels. Macromolecules 23 (5), 1517–1519. 10.1021/ma00207a046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mei L., Zheng Y., Gao X., Ma T., Xia B., Hao Y., et al. (2022). Hsa-let-7f-1-3p targeting the circadian gene Bmal1 mediates intervertebral disc degeneration by regulating autophagy. Pharmacol. Res. 186, 106537. 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mohd Isa I. L., Abbah S. A., Kilcoyne M., Sakai D., Dockery P., Finn D. P., et al. (2018). Implantation of hyaluronic acid hydrogel prevents the pain phenotype in a rat model of intervertebral disc injury. Sci. Adv. 4 (4), eaaq0597. 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Mohd Isa I. L., Teoh S. L., Mohd Nor N. H., Mokhtar S. A. (2022). Discogenic low back pain: anatomy, pathophysiology and treatments of intervertebral disc degeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (1), 208. 10.3390/ijms24010208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Mortisen D., Peroglio M., Alini M., Eglin D. (2010). Tailoring thermoreversible hyaluronan hydrogels by “click” chemistry and RAFT polymerization for cell and drug therapy. Biomacromolecules 11 (5), 1261–1272. 10.1021/bm100046n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Nagae M., Ikeda T., Mikami Y., Hase H., Ozawa H., Matsuda K.-I., et al. (2007). Intervertebral disc regeneration using platelet-rich plasma and biodegradable gelatin hydrogel microspheres. Tissue Eng. 13 (1), 147–158. 10.1089/ten.2006.0042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Nuttelman C. R., Rice M. A., Rydholm A. E., Salinas C. N., Shah D. N., Anseth K. S. (2008). Macromolecular monomers for the synthesis of hydrogel niches and their application in cell encapsulation and tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33 (2), 167–179. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Oh Y.-K., Senter P. D., Song S.-C. (2009). Intelligent drug delivery systems. Bioconjugate Chem. 20 (10), 1813–1815. 10.1021/bc900260x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ohnishi T., Sudo H., Tsujimoto T., Iwasaki N. (2018). Age-related spontaneous lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in a mouse model. J. Orthop. Res. official Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 36 (1), 224–232. 10.1002/jor.23634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Oichi T., Taniguchi Y., Oshima Y., Tanaka S., Saito T. (2020). Pathomechanism of intervertebral disc degeneration. JOR spine 3 (1), e1076. 10.1002/jsp2.1076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Pan Z., Sun H., Xie B., Xia D., Zhang X., Yu D., et al. (2018). Therapeutic effects of gefitinib-encapsulated thermosensitive injectable hydrogel in intervertebral disc degeneration. Biomaterials 160, 56–68. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Panebianco C. J., Rao S., Hom W. W., Meyers J. H., Lim T. Y., Laudier D. M., et al. (2022). Genipin-crosslinked fibrin seeded with oxidized alginate microbeads as a novel composite biomaterial strategy for intervertebral disc cell therapy. Biomaterials 287, 121641. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pokharna H. K., Phillips F. M. (1998). Collagen crosslinks in human lumbar intervertebral disc aging. Spine 23 (15), 1645–1648. 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Polizzotti B. D., Fairbanks B. D., Anseth K. S. (2008). Three-dimensional biochemical patterning of click-based composite hydrogels via thiolene photopolymerization. Biomacromolecules 9 (4), 1084–1087. 10.1021/bm7012636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Qiu Y., Park K. (2001). Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. drug Deliv. Rev. 53 (3), 321–339. 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00203-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Qiu Y., Park K. (2012). Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 49–60. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Rahmani F., Atabaki R., Behrouzi S., Mohamadpour F., Kamali H. (2023). The recent advancement in the PLGA-based thermo-sensitive hydrogel for smart drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 631, 122484. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Raj P. P. (2008). Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract. 8 (1), 18–44. 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Rasekhi A., Babaahmadi A., Assadsangabi R., Nabavizadeh S. A. (2006). Clinical manifestations and MRI findings of patients with hydrated and dehydrated lumbar disc herniation. Acad. Radiol. 13 (12), 1485–1489. 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Rider S. M., Mizuno S., Kang J. D. (2019). Molecular mechanisms of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine Surg. Relat. Res. 3 (1), 1–11. 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Rivera-Hernández G., Antunes-Ricardo M., Martínez-Morales P., Sánchez M. L. (2021). Polyvinyl alcohol based-drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Int. J. Pharm. 600, 120478. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Roberts S., Evans H., Trivedi J., Menage J. (2006). Histology and pathology of the human intervertebral disc. Am. volume 88 (2), 10–14. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Roh E. J., Darai A., Kyung J. W., Choi H., Kwon S. Y., Bhujel B., et al. (2021). Genetic therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (4), 1579. 10.3390/ijms22041579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Russo F., Ambrosio L., Peroglio M., Guo W., Wangler S., Gewiess J., et al. (2021). A hyaluronan and platelet-rich plasma hydrogel for mesenchymal stem cell delivery in the intervertebral disc: an organ culture study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (6), 2963. 10.3390/ijms22062963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rutges J. P., Kummer J. A., Oner F. C., Verbout A. J., Castelein R. J., Roestenburg H. J., et al. (2008). Increased MMP-2 activity during intervertebral disc degeneration is correlated to MMP-14 levels. J. pathology 214 (4), 523–530. 10.1002/path.2317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Sakai D., Nakamura Y., Nakai T., Mishima T., Kato S., Grad S., et al. (2012). Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Nat. Commun. 3 (1), 1264. 10.1038/ncomms2226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Samanta A., Lufkin T., Kraus P. (2023). Intervertebral disc degeneration—current therapeutic options and challenges. Front. Public Health 11, 1156749. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1156749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Sayiner O., Arisoy S., Comoglu T., Ozbay F. G., Esendagli G. (2020). Development and in vitro evaluation of temozolomide-loaded PLGA nanoparticles in a thermoreversible hydrogel system for local administration in glioblastoma multiforme. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 57, 101627. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101627 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Schmitz T. C., van Genabeek B., Pouderoijen M. J., Janssen H. M., van Doeselaar M., Crispim J. F., et al. (2023). Semi-synthetic degradable notochordal cell-derived matrix hydrogel for use in degenerated intervertebral discs: initial in vitro characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 111 (12), 1903–1915. 10.1002/jbm.a.37594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Schmocker A., Khoushabi A., Frauchiger D. A., Gantenbein B., Schizas C., Moser C., et al. (2016). A photopolymerized composite hydrogel and surgical implanting tool for a nucleus pulposus replacement. Biomaterials 88, 110–119. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Shapiro I. M., Vresilovic E. J., Risbud M. V. (2012). Is the spinal motion segment a diarthrodial polyaxial joint: what a nice nucleus like you doing in a joint like this? Bone 50 (3), 771–776. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Shen J., Chen A., Cai Z., Chen Z., Cao R., Liu Z., et al. (2022). Exhausted local lactate accumulation via injectable nanozyme-functionalized hydrogel microsphere for inflammation relief and tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 12, 153–168. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Siemionow K., An H., Masuda K., Andersson G., Cs-Szabo G. (2011). The effects of age, sex, ethnicity, and spinal level on the rate of intervertebral disc degeneration: a review of 1712 intervertebral discs. Spine 36 (17), 1333–1339. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f2a177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Silagi E. S., Novais E. J., Bisetto S., Telonis A. G., Snuggs J., Le Maitre C. L., et al. (2020). Lactate efflux from intervertebral disc cells is required for maintenance of spine health. J. bone mineral Res. official J. Am. Soc. Bone Mineral Res. 35 (3), 550–570. 10.1002/jbmr.3908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Sun Y., Kaplan J. A., Shieh A., Sun H. L., Croce C. M., Grinstaff M. W., et al. (2016a). Self-assembly of a 5-fluorouracil-dipeptide hydrogel. Chem. Commun. Camb. Engl. 52 (30), 5254–5257. 10.1039/c6cc01195k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Sun Z., Luo B., Liu Z., Huang L., Liu B., Ma T., et al. (2016b). Effect of perfluorotributylamine-enriched alginate on nucleus pulposus cell: implications for intervertebral disc regeneration. Biomaterials 82, 34–47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Suntornnond R., Tan E. Y. S., An J., Chua C. K. (2016). A mathematical model on the resolution of extrusion bioprinting for the development of new bioinks. Materials 9 (9), 756. 10.3390/ma9090756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Suryandaru H., Aziz A., Hanifah N., Rasyida A. (2021). Alginate/PVA/chitosan injection composites as scaffold material for nucleus pulposus regeneration. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 649, 012019. 10.1088/1755-1315/649/1/012019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Tanaka T., Nishio I., Sun S.-T., Ueno-Nishio S. (1982). Collapse of gels in an electric field. Science 218 (4571), 467–469. 10.1126/science.218.4571.467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Tang L., Xu C., Xuan A., Zhu Z., Ruan D. (2022). Functionalized self-assembling peptide RADKPS hydrogels promote regenerative repair of degenerated intervertebral discs. Biomaterials Sci. 10 (18), 5134–5145. 10.1039/d2bm00634k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Thorpe A. A., Boyes V. L., Sammon C., Le Maitre C. L. (2016). Thermally triggered injectable hydrogel, which induces mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to nucleus pulposus cells: potential for regeneration of the intervertebral disc. Acta Biomater. 36, 99–111. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Urban J. P., Roberts S. (2003). Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res. Ther. 5 (3), 120–130. 10.1186/ar629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Van der Schueren L., De Meyer T., Steyaert I., Ceylan Ö., Hemelsoet K., Van Speybroeck V., et al. (2013). Polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone/chitosan nanofibres functionalised with the pH-sensitive dye Nitrazine Yellow. Carbohydr. Polym. 91 (1), 284–293. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. van Uden S., Silva-Correia J., Oliveira J. M., Reis R. L. (2017). Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities. Biomaterials Res. 21 (1), 22–19. 10.1186/s40824-017-0106-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Varma D., Lin H., Long R., Gold G., Hecht A., Iatridis J., et al. (2018). Thermoresponsive, redox-polymerized cellulosic hydrogels undergo in situ gelation and restore intervertebral disc biomechanics post discectomy. Eur. cells Mater. 35, 300–317. 10.22203/eCM.v035a21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Vasiliadis E. S., Pneumaticos S. G., Evangelopoulos D. S., Papavassiliou A. G. (2014). Biologic treatment of mild and moderate intervertebral disc degeneration. Mol. Med. 20 (1), 400–409. 10.2119/molmed.2014.00145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Verhulsel M., Vignes M., Descroix S., Malaquin L., Vignjevic D. M., Viovy J. L. (2014). A review of microfabrication and hydrogel engineering for micro-organs on chips. Biomaterials 35 (6), 1816–1832. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Vo N. V., Hartman R. A., Yurube T., Jacobs L. J., Sowa G. A., Kang J. D. (2013). Expression and regulation of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Spine J. 13 (3), 331–341. 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Wang D. K., Zheng H. L., Zhou W. S., Duan Z. W., Jiang S. D., Li B., et al. (2022a). Mitochondrial dysfunction in oxidative stress-mediated intervertebral disc degeneration. Orthop. Surg. 14 (8), 1569–1582. 10.1111/os.13302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wang F., Cai F., Shi R., Wang X. H., Wu X. T. (2016). Aging and age related stresses: a senescence mechanism of intervertebral disc degeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 24 (3), 398–408. 10.1016/j.joca.2015.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang Q., Gao J., Liu S., Wang Y., Wu L. (2023d). Lignin nanoparticle reinforced multifunctional polyvinyl alcohol/polyurethane composite hydrogel with excellent mechanical, UV-blocking, rheological and thermal properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 232, 123338. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wang S. L., Yu Y. L., Tang C. L., Lv F. Z. (2013). Effects of TGF-β1 and IL-1β on expression of ADAMTS enzymes and TIMP-3 in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Exp. Ther. Med. 6 (6), 1522–1526. 10.3892/etm.2013.1348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wang Y., Cheng H., Wang T., Zhang K., Zhang Y., Kang X. (2023b). Oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration: molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and treatment. Cell Prolif. 56, e13448. 10.1111/cpr.13448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang Y., Deng M., Wu Y., Hu C., Zhang B., Guo C., et al. (2022b). Sustained gene delivery from inflammation-responsive anti-inflammatory hydrogels promotes extracellular matrix metabolism balance in degenerative nucleus pulposus. Compos. Part B Eng. 236, 109806. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109806 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wang Y., Wu Y., Zhang B., Zheng C., Hu C., Guo C., et al. (2023a). Repair of degenerative nucleus pulposus by polyphenol nanosphere-encapsulated hydrogel gene delivery system. Biomaterials 298, 122132. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wang Y., Zhang Y., Chen K., Shao F., Wu Y., Guo C., et al. (2021). Injectable nanostructured colloidal gels resembling native nucleus pulposus as carriers of mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of degenerated intervertebral discs. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 128, 112343. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wang Y., Zheng C., Wu Y., Zhang B., Hu C., Guo C., et al. (2023c). An injectable and self-strengthening nanogel encapsuled hydrogel gene delivery system promotes degenerative nucleus pulposus repair. Compos. Part B Eng. 250, 110469. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110469 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wang Z., Jin X., Zhang B., Kong J., Deng R., Wu K., et al. (2023e). Stress stimulation maintaining by genipin crosslinked hydrogel promotes annulus fibrosus healing. J. Orthop. Transl. 40, 104–115. 10.1016/j.jot.2023.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang Z., Kumar H., Tian Z., Jin X., Holzman J. F., Menard F., et al. (2018). Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl. Mater. interfaces 10 (32), 26859–26869. 10.1021/acsami.8b06607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wei B., Zhao Y., Li W., Zhang S., Yan M., Hu Z., et al. (2022). Innovative immune mechanisms and antioxidative therapies of intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1023877. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1023877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wen P., Zheng B., Zhang B., Ma T., Hao L., Zhang Y. (2022). The role of ageing and oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 1052878. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1052878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Williams F. M., Popham M., Sambrook P. N., Jones A. F., Spector T. D., MacGregor A. J. (2011). Progression of lumbar disc degeneration over a decade: a heritability study. Ann. rheumatic Dis. 70 (7), 1203–1207. 10.1136/ard.2010.146001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Williams F. M., Sambrook P. N. (2011). Neck and back pain and intervertebral disc degeneration: role of occupational factors. Clin. Rheumatol. 25 (1), 69–79. 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Woodard L. N., Grunlan M. A. (2018). Hydrolytic degradation and erosion of polyester biomaterials. ACS macro Lett. 7 (8), 976–982. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wu D., Li G., Zhou X., Zhang W., Liang H., Luo R., et al. (2022). Repair strategies and bioactive functional materials for intervertebral disc. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (52), 2209471. 10.1002/adfm.202209471 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wu R., Huang L., Xia Q., Liu Z., Huang Y., Jiang Y., et al. (2023). Injectable mesoporous bioactive glass/sodium alginate hydrogel loaded with melatonin for intervertebral disc regeneration. Bio 22, 100731. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Xin J., Wang Y., Zheng Z., Wang S., Na S., Zhang S. (2022). Treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Orthop. Surg. 14 (7), 1271–1280. 10.1111/os.13254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Xing H., Zhang Z., Mao Q., Wang C., Zhou Y., Zhou X., et al. (2021). Injectable exosome-functionalized extracellular matrix hydrogel for metabolism balance and pyroptosis regulation in intervertebral disc degeneration. J. nanobiotechnology 19 (1), 264. 10.1186/s12951-021-00991-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Xu H., Dong R., Zeng Q., Fang L., Ge Q., Xia C., et al. (2022). Col9a2 gene deletion accelerates the degeneration of intervertebral discs. Exp. Ther. Med. 23 (3), 207. 10.3892/etm.2022.11130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Xu H., Sun M., Wang C., Xia K., Xiao S., Wang Y., et al. (2020). Growth differentiation factor-5-gelatin methacryloyl injectable microspheres laden with adipose-derived stem cells for repair of disc degeneration. Biofabrication 13 (1), 015010. 10.1088/1758-5090/abc4d3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Yahia S., Khalil I. A., El-Sherbiny I. M. (2023). Fortified gelatin-based hydrogel scaffold with simvastatin-mixed nanomicelles and platelet rich plasma as a promising bioimplant for tissue regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 225, 730–744. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Yan C., Wang X., Xiang C., Wang Y., Pu C., Chen L., et al. (2021). Applications of functionalized hydrogels in the regeneration of the intervertebral disc. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 1–19. 10.1155/2021/2818624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Yan Q., Xiao L. Q., Tan L., Sun W., Wu T., Chen L. W., et al. (2015). Controlled release of simvastatin‐loaded thermo‐sensitive PLGA‐PEG‐PLGA hydrogel for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro and in vivo characteristics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 103 (11), 3580–3589. 10.1002/jbm.a.35499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Yang J., Yang X., Wang L., Zhang W., Yu W., Wang N., et al. (2017). Biomimetic nanofibers can construct effective tissue-engineered intervertebral discs for therapeutic implantation. Nanoscale 9 (35), 13095–13103. 10.1039/c7nr03944a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Yang L., Yu C., Fan X., Zeng T., Yang W., Xia J., et al. (2022a). Dual-dynamic-bond cross-linked injectable hydrogel of multifunction for intervertebral disc degeneration therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 20 (1), 433. 10.1186/s12951-022-01633-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Yang L., Yu C., Fan X., Zeng T., Yang W., Xia J., et al. (2022b). Dual-dynamic-bond cross-linked injectable hydrogel of multifunction for intervertebral disc degeneration therapy. J. nanobiotechnology 20 (1), 433. 10.1186/s12951-022-01633-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Ye L., Gao Z., Rohani S. (2023). Intervertebral disk regeneration in a rat model by allopurinol-loaded chitosan/alginate hydrogel. Biomol. Biomed. 23 (4), 661–670. 10.17305/bb.2022.8550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Ying X., Wang Y., Liang J., Yue J., Xu C., Lu L., et al. (2014). Angiopep‐conjugated electro‐responsive hydrogel nanoparticles: therapeutic potential for epilepsy. Angew. Chem. 126 (46), 12644–12648. 10.1002/ange.201403846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yu X., Cao X., Chen X., Ayres N., Zhang P. (2015). Triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion from rationally designed polymeric emitters with tunable inter-chromophore distances. Chem. Commun. Camb. Engl. 51 (3), 588–591. 10.1039/c4cc07589g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yuan S., Bai J., Li S., Ma N., Deng S., Zhu H., et al. (2023). A multifunctional and selective ionic flexible sensor with high environmental suitability for tactile perception. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2309626. 10.1002/adfm.202309626 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  176. Yue K., Trujillo-de Santiago G., Alvarez M. M., Tamayol A., Annabi N., Khademhosseini A. (2015). Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73, 254–271. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Zewail M., Nafee N., Boraie N. (2021). Intra-articular dual drug delivery for synergistic rheumatoid arthritis treatment. J. Pharm. Sci. 110 (7), 2808–2822. 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zhai D., Liu B., Shi Y., Pan L., Wang Y., Li W., et al. (2013). Highly sensitive glucose sensor based on pt nanoparticle/polyaniline hydrogel heterostructures. ACS Nano 7 (4), 3540–3546. 10.1021/nn400482d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Zhang C. Y., Hu X. C., Zhang G. Z., Liu M. Q., Chen H. W., Kang X. W. (2022a). Role of Nrf2 and HO-1 in intervertebral disc degeneration. Connect. tissue Res. 63 (6), 559–576. 10.1080/03008207.2022.2089565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Zhang H.-J., Liao H.-Y., Bai D.-Y., Wang Z.-Q., Xie X.-W. (2021). MAPK/ERK signaling pathway: a potential target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Biomed. Pharmacother. 143, 112170. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Zhang K., Liu Y., Shi X., Zhang R., He Y., Zhang H., et al. (2023). Application of polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan copolymer hydrogels in biomedicine: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 242, 125192. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Zhang X., Wan H., Lan W., Miao F., Qin M., Wei Y., et al. (2022b). Fabrication of adhesive hydrogels based on poly (acrylic acid) and modified hyaluronic acid. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 126, 105044. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Zhao C. Q., Zhang Y. H., Jiang S. D., Li H., Jiang L. S., Dai L. Y. (2011). ADAMTS-5 and intervertebral disc degeneration: the results of tissue immunohistochemistry and in vitro cell culture. J. Orthop. Res. official Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 29 (5), 718–725. 10.1002/jor.21285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Zhao Y., Li A. (2021). miR-19b-3p relieves intervertebral disc degeneration through modulating PTEN/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Aging 13 (18), 22459–22473. 10.18632/aging.203553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Zheng K., Du D. (2021). Recent advances of hydrogel-based biomaterials for intervertebral disc tissue treatment: a literature review. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 15 (4), 299–321. 10.1002/term.3172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Zheng Q., Shen H., Tong Z., Cheng L., Xu Y., Feng Z., et al. (2021). A thermosensitive, reactive oxygen species-responsive, MR409-encapsulated hydrogel ameliorates disc degeneration in rats by inhibiting the secretory autophagy pathway. Theranostics 11 (1), 147–163. 10.7150/thno.47723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Zheng W. J., Gao J., Wei Z., Zhou J., Chen Y. M. (2015). Facile fabrication of self-healing carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels. Eur. Polym. J. 72, 514–522. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.06.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  188. Zheng Z., Chen A., He H., Chen Y., Chen J., Albashari A. A., et al. (2019). pH and enzyme dual-responsive release of hydrogen sulfide for disc degeneration therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 7 (4), 611–618. 10.1039/c8tb02566e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES