Table 2.
(a) mOPV2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iteration index | Number of cVDPV2 cases | Number of affected subpopulations | % cases in high R0 blocks* | % cases in low RI coverage blocks+ | % cases in blocks representing high transmission areas# |
23 | 44,125 | 197 | 80 | 36 | 54 |
55 | 43,054 | 182 | 71 | 49 | 40 |
80 | 41,443 | 180 | 75 | 42 | 56 |
5 | 39,823 | 173 | 81 | 46 | 56 |
93 | 38,616 | 159 | 77 | 43 | 51 |
45 | 38,191 | 177 | 75 | 40 | 53 |
87 | 37,616 | 124 | 58 | 57 | 16 |
81 | 35,092 | 131 | 77 | 43 | 52 |
33 | 34,485 | 153 | 87 | 44 | 65 |
57 | 34,481 | 124 | 62 | 44 | 46 |
(b) best nOPV2 | |||||
Iteration index | Number of cVDPV2 cases | Number of affected subpopulations | % cases in high R0 blocks* | % cases in low RI coverage blocks+ | % cases in blocks representing high transmission areas# |
6 | 26,209 | 119 | 75 | 32 | 50 |
9 | 25,119 | 101 | 95 | 70 | 43 |
100 | 23,682 | 103 | 65 | 61 | 35 |
3 | 23,222 | 100 | 87 | 52 | 76 |
66 | 17,634 | 73 | 76 | 45 | 50 |
5 | 16,860 | 74 | 68 | 84 | 0 |
64 | 14,947 | 78 | 53 | 67 | 0 |
98 | 14,278 | 90 | 26 | 29 | 3 |
94 | 12,944 | 52 | 61 | 91 | 4 |
38 | 12,585 | 69 | 44 | 64 | 0 |
(c) worst nOPV2 | |||||
Iteration index | Number of cVDPV2 cases | Number of affected subpopulations | % cases in high R0 blocks* | % cases in low RI coverage blocks+ | % cases in blocks representing high transmission areas# |
94 | 51,270 | 184 | 58 | 46 | 27 |
55 | 50,683 | 182 | 67 | 53 | 36 |
6 | 48,882 | 179 | 82 | 48 | 52 |
23 | 47,918 | 185 | 75 | 39 | 52 |
34 | 46,464 | 152 | 60 | 60 | 23 |
66 | 45,035 | 160 | 72 | 47 | 48 |
84 | 44,178 | 144 | 59 | 54 | 20 |
33 | 43,770 | 172 | 76 | 35 | 67 |
100 | 43,390 | 132 | 79 | 60 | 43 |
9 | 41,759 | 128 | 84 | 55 | 51 |
Notes:
R0≥10;
RI coverage ≤0.3,
blocks 47–58, 68–69 indicated in Table 1
Abbreviations: cVDPV2, type 2 circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses; type 2 monovalent OPV; nOPV2, type 2 novel OPV; OPV, oral poliovirus vaccine; R0, basic reproduction number; RI, routine immunization