TABLE 4.
Comparisons of the proposed Raman-CNN with other methods used for yeast identification
| Criteria | Raman-CNN | PCR-based methods | DNA sequencing | Biochemical tests | Microscopic examination | MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis time | Seconds to minutes | Hours to a day | Several days | Several days | Minutes to hours | Minutes |
| Sample preparation | Minimal | DNA extraction and purification | DNA extraction and purification | Culturing and sample preparation | Cell staining | Minimal |
| Non-destructive | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Sensitivity | High | High | High | Moderate to low | Moderate | High |
| Identification resolution | Strain level | Species to strain level | Strain level | Species to strain level | Species level | Species to strain level |
| Sample volume | Minimal | Small amount of DNA | Small amount of DNA | Large | Minimal | Small amount |
| Real-time monitoring | Possible | No | No | No | No | No |
| Cost | No reagent and minimal consumables, primarily driven by the instrument | Moderate, including the equipment, reagents, and consumables | High, driven by the equipment, reagents, and consumables | Moderate, including culture media, reagents, and consumables | Low, emphasizing on microscope and staining reagents | Minimal consumables, primarily driven by the instrument and reagents |
| Portability | Possible | Possible | Possible | Possible | Possible | No |
| References | (13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 85, 87–90) | |||||