Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;89(12):e01673-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.01673-23

TABLE 4.

Comparisons of the proposed Raman-CNN with other methods used for yeast identification

Criteria Raman-CNN PCR-based methods DNA sequencing Biochemical tests Microscopic examination MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry
Analysis time Seconds to minutes Hours to a day Several days Several days Minutes to hours Minutes
Sample preparation Minimal DNA extraction and purification DNA extraction and purification Culturing and sample preparation Cell staining Minimal
Non-destructive Yes No No No Yes No
Sensitivity High High High Moderate to low Moderate High
Identification resolution Strain level Species to strain level Strain level Species to strain level Species level Species to strain level
Sample volume Minimal Small amount of DNA Small amount of DNA Large Minimal Small amount
Real-time monitoring Possible No No No No No
Cost No reagent and minimal consumables, primarily driven by the instrument Moderate, including the equipment, reagents, and consumables High, driven by the equipment, reagents, and consumables Moderate, including culture media, reagents, and consumables Low, emphasizing on microscope and staining reagents Minimal consumables, primarily driven by the instrument and reagents
Portability Possible Possible Possible Possible Possible No
References (13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 85, 8790)