Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 11;46(1):217–223. doi: 10.3906/kim-2107-21

Table 4.

Statistical comparison for the results obtained by the proposed method and the official methods for the determination of PAR and PHE in pure powder form.

CZE Official method
PAR PHE PAR*[2] PHE**[1]
Mean 99.86 100.05 100.16 100.18
S.D. 0.660 0.649 0.792 0.952
Variance 0.436 0.421 0.627 0.906
n 7 7 6 6
Student’s t-test*** (2.201) 0.728 0.283
F value***(4.39) 1.44 2.152
*

Direct UV spectrophotometric determination at 244 nm.

**

Potentiometric titration method.

***

Figures between parentheses represent the corresponding tabulated values of t and F at p = 0.05.