Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 25;10(12):1852. doi: 10.3390/children10121852

Table 6.

Multilevel regression models examining the effects of bullying role scores (PRQ) and externalizing problems (TSDQ) (unstandardized B (SE)). Model 1 is unadjusted, while model 2 is adjusted for age and sex. Models 3 (unadjusted) and 4 (adjusted for age and sex, where ‘boy’ = 0 and ‘girl’ = 1) additionally examine for the effect of school-level disadvantage. School N = 50.

Model 1
(N = 2665)
Model 2
(N = 2640)
Model 3
(N = 2665)
Model 4
(N = 2640)
Intercept 2.24 (0.16) *** 2.54 (0.35) *** 2.11 (0.22) *** 2.39 (0.38) ***
Bully perpetrator 0.60 (0.05) *** 0.55 (0.05) *** 0.68(0.08) *** 0.58 (0.08) ***
Reinforcer 0.06 (0.05) 0.06 (0.05) 0.02 (0.07) 0.02 (0.07)
Defender −0.10 (0.02) *** −0.08 (0.02) ** −0.10 (0.04) ** −0.07 (0.04) *
Outsider −0.11 (0.03) *** −0.10 (0.03) ** −0.11 (0.03) *** −0.10 (0.03) **
Age 0.00 (0.04) −0.01 (0.04)
Sex −0.93 (0.07) *** −0.93 (0.07) ***
School-level disadvantage 0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (0.01)
School-level disadvantage x Bully Perpetrator −0.01 (0.01) 0.00 (0.01)
School-level disadvantage x Reinforcer 0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (0.01)
School-level disadvantage x Defender 0.00 (0.01) 0.00 (0.00)
School-level disadvantage x Outsider 0.00 (0.01) 0.00 (0.00)
Random Effects Intercept (SD) 0.38 0.40 0.37 0.37
ICC 0.04 0.045 0.037 0.038

Note: *** p < 0.001. ** p < 0.01. * p < 0.05.