Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 10;13(24):3635. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243635

Table 1.

Retinal imaging techniques.

Techniques Pros Cons
Color fundus photography (CFP)
  • Conventional historical

  • Low contrast

  • Closely resembles clinical ophthalmoscopy

  • Experienced photographers and patient cooperation needed

  • Documents a wide range of fundus abnormalities and AMD-associated phenotypic changes, particularly hemorrhages and focal pigmentary changes.

  • Difficulties in precisely delineating lesion boundaries/quantification of atrophic size

  • Sensitive to optical media

Multicolor imaging
  • High contrast

  • Less distinct structures due to chromatic aberration

  • Reveals details of different retinal layers

  • Poor distinction between hemorrhages and pigmentary lesions

Ultra-widefield (UWF)
  • Visualization of wide field of the retina

  • Developing tool

  • Peripheral abnormalities visible

  • Limited data available

  • Unknown clinical significance of peripheral lesions in AMD

Fundus fluorescein angiography (FA)
  • Visualization of retinal vasculature

  • Invasive procedures

  • Gold standard for NV detection and quantification

  • Limited imaging window after injection

  • Excludes presence of concurrent NV

  • Risk of life-threatening allergic reaction

  • Sharper contrast between atrophic and surrounding non-atrophic areas.

  • Other lesions or leakage may obscure boundary demarcation of atrophy

  • No visualization of choriocapillaris

Indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A)
  • Visualization of choroidal vasculature

  • Invasive procedures

  • Choroidal imaging for differential diagnosis of PCV, RAP, CSR, Stargardt disease and nAMD

  • Limited imaging window after injection

  • Risk of life-threatening allergic reaction

  • Deep choroidal vessels may interfere with outline of area of atrophy

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF)
  • Non-invasive

  • Sensitive to optical media

  • High contrast, good atrophic lesion boundary discrimination

  • Refractile (calcified) drusen at advanced stage are undetectable

  • Quantification of RPE loss

  • Overestimates size of atrophic patch at macula

  • Mask an atrophic area due to relative hypofluorescence of the fovea

  • Unable to discern non-RPE layer features

Near-infrared reflectance (NIR)
  • Non-invasive

  • No validation studies in the detection of late AMD

  • Unaffected by luteal pigment in foveal evaluation

  • Complements other imaging techniques

  • High sensitivity for reticular pseudodrusen

  • Not affected by optical media

Spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT)/Swept-source OCT (SS-OCT)
  • Non-invasive

  • Scan field depends on optics used in the system

  • Three-dimensional

  • Detects morphology of retina layers, RPE, and choroid

  • Detects early AMD features

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT)
  • Novel technique

  • No validation studies

  • Assess RPE pigmentation

Optical Doppler tomography (ODT)
  • Quantitative imaging of vasculature

  • Still limited data available

  • Functional detection

Phase contrast optical coherence tomography (PC-OCT)
  • Retinal microvasculature imaging

  • No consensus yet

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
  • Non-invasive, no dye injection

  • Acquisition time and field when used with conventional OCT

  • Three-dimensional images of vasculature

  • Evaluation of choroidal layers

  • Lower limitation in detecting slow blood flow

  • Administered at any time

Abbreviations: AMD: age-related macular degeneration; CSR: chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; nAMD: neovascular AMD; PCV: polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; RAP: retinal angiomatous proliferation. RPE: Retinal pigment epithelium.