Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 15;11(24):3170. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243170

Table 1.

Appraisal checklist.

Papers Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10
Tumiel-Berhalter and Zayas, 2006 [24] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Poureslami et al., 2011 [25] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y
Patel et al., 2014 [26] U Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Melton et al., 2014 [27] Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y
Lathan et al., 2015 [28] Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y
Lee et al., 2016 [29] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Glasser et al., 2016 [30] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Webb and McDonnell, 2018 [31] Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y
Druedahl et al., 2018 [32] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Ahmed et al., 2022 [33] Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y

Note: JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Q1: Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? Q2: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives? Q3: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? Q4: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? Q5: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? Q6: Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? Q7: Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice versa, addressed? Q8: Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? Q9: Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? Q10: Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis or interpretation of the data? Abbreviation: Y, yes; N, no; U, unclear.