Table 1.
Papers | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tumiel-Berhalter and Zayas, 2006 [24] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Poureslami et al., 2011 [25] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y |
Patel et al., 2014 [26] | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Melton et al., 2014 [27] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Lathan et al., 2015 [28] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Lee et al., 2016 [29] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Glasser et al., 2016 [30] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Webb and McDonnell, 2018 [31] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Druedahl et al., 2018 [32] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Ahmed et al., 2022 [33] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y |
Note: JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Q1: Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? Q2: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives? Q3: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? Q4: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? Q5: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? Q6: Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? Q7: Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice versa, addressed? Q8: Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? Q9: Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? Q10: Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis or interpretation of the data? Abbreviation: Y, yes; N, no; U, unclear.