Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;12(2):86–95. doi: 10.1101/lm.79305

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Experiment 1. Global analysis of blocking (pooled data for training and test). (Left) Percentage of PER in the six conditioning trials of the first training phase (preconditioning with a single odor, A or N). (Middle) Percentage of PER in the six conditioning trials of the second training phase (compound conditioning with AB). §Significant difference between sixth preconditioning trial and the first compound-conditioning trial. (Right) Percentage of PER in the extinction test. Response to B was significantly higher in the novel than in the block group.