Table 2.
A
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Changes in GS when cells are transferred to an ammonia-limiting medium
|
||
Cell type | Experiment | Simulation |
Wild type | ++ | ++ |
ΔglnG (ΔNRI) | ± | ± |
ΔglnL (ΔNRII) | ± | ± |
ΔglnD (ΔUTase/UR) | ++ | + |
ΔglnB (ΔPII) | ± | ± |
ΔglnK (ΔGlnK) | ++ | ++ |
B
|
|
|
---|---|---|
The GS concentration of mutants is compared with that of a wild type in the ammonia-rich medium
|
||
Mutant | Experiment | Simulation |
ΔglnL (ΔNRII) | + | + |
ΔglnD (ΔUTase/UR) | – | – |
ΔglnB (ΔPII) | ++ | ++ |
ΔglnK (ΔGlnK) | ± | ± |
The GS concentrations of a wild-type and knockout mutants were simulated in an ammonia-limiting or ammonia-rich medium to compare with those of experimental data.
(A) The GS concentrations were compared between an ammonia-rich medium and an ammonia-limiting medium, where a wild type greatly increased the GS concentration due to the Ntr response. When the cells were transferred from an ammonia-rich medium to an ammonia-limiting medium, the GS concentration increased more than five-fold (++), increased five- to two-fold (+), and hardly changed (less than two-fold) (±). (B) The GS concentrations of the mutants were compared with those of a wild type in an ammonia-rich medium. Compared with the wild type, the GS concentration of mutants increased five-fold (++), increased five- to two-fold (+), hardly changed (±), and decreased (–).