Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 3;59(12):2114. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122114

Table 1.

Comparisons of the various OCT technologies.

TD-OCT SD-OCT SS-OCT
1. Commercial Availability 1996 [4] 2006 [4] 2012 [4]
2. Principle of Operation A beam splitter splits incident light into a reference wavelength which is adjusted for different depths while the sample light is reflected from the observed tissue and recombined at a sensor to give a single profile of the tissue [5]. Based on FD-OCT. It has similar principles to TD-OCT, but the sensor is upgraded to a spectrometer to split the reflected light into wavelengths (λ) using a diffractor. A combination of the individual images provided by the λs produces a Fourier transform to obtain depth information (A-scan) [6]. Also based on FD-OCT like SD-OCT. It possesses a sweeping tunable laser as its light source. A photoreceiver transduces the relayed signals into noise (images) [7].
3. Bandwidth 20 nm [8] 150 nm [8] ~1040–1080 nm [8]
4. Wavelength
Frequency
810 nm [8] 840 nm [8] ~1050 nm [9]
5. Axial resolution 8–10 µm [9] 5–7 µm [9] 5.3 µm [10]
6. Scan Speeds 400 A-scans per second [11] 20,000–52,000 A-scans per second [11] 100,000–236,000 A-scans per second [11,12]