Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 18;13(24):3170. doi: 10.3390/nano13243170

Table 3.

Comparison of 3-1 composites of PVDF/PVDF-TrFE (OC, SC, Ø, and l stand for open circuit, short circuit, diameter, and length, respectively. No Xc data were given and so the column was removed. Numbers in blue are values for pure PVDF films the author of the study made).

Material Poled V (V) I (μA) Resistor (MΩ) Power Density (μW/cm2) %
β-Phase
d33
(pC/N)
εr d332/(εrε0)
or d33g33
(m2/N × 10−12)
Power Density
/(Force × Hz)
µW/(cm2∙N∙Hz)
Loading
[86] PVDF-ZnO
(Ø ~ 200 nm)
X 46.64 1.392
SC
15 45.87
1800×
94.4% of total crystallinity
53
- - - 3.7 Finger Tapping
~12–14 kPa
3 Hz
[87] PVDF-ZnO (Ø hundreds of nm) ~0.7 OC
~0.3 OC
~0.05
SC
~0.01 SC
- - - - ~2.4
~1.3
- - Bending
3.2% strain
[88] PVDF-
ZnO (Ø ~ 30 nm)
X - - - - - 14.91 ±
4.39
5.35 ±
1.42
- - - -
[89] PVDF (Ø 160 nm)-ZnO (l = 1.5 µm Ø 120 nm) X 0.356
OC
~0.216
0.456
SC
0.212
- - 90% of total crystallinity - - - - Compression
4 N
6 Hz
[90] PVDF-ZnO
(Ø 200 nm l = 3 µm)
X 2.73 152.2 0.018 103.9 - - - - - Compression
125 Pa