. 2023 Dec 16;15(24):5125. doi: 10.3390/nu15245125

Table 4.

Association between perceived HRQoL and physical fitness.

		High HRQoL ^§ (n = 1759)	Low HRQoL ^§ (n = 1775)
General fitness status	Crude OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.29 (0.25–0.34) **
General fitness status	Adjusted OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.34 (0.29–0.40) **
Cardiorespiratory physical condition	Crude OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.29 (0.25–0.34) **
Cardiorespiratory physical condition	Adjusted OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.34 (0.29–0.39) **
Muscle strength	Crude OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.42 (0.35–0.49) **
Muscle strength	Adjusted OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.45 (0.38–0.54) **
Speed and agility	Crude OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.44 (0.38–0.51) **
Speed and agility	Adjusted OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.53 (0.45–0.62) **
Flexibility	Crude OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.55 (0.46–0.66) **
Flexibility	Adjusted OR	1.00 (ref.)	0.63 (0.52–0.76) **

Values are Odds Ratio (95%CI). Abbreviations: CI: Confidence Interval. HRQoL: Health-Related Quality of Life; OR: Odds Ratio. ^§ Percentiles of the Grouping variable = ((HealthTODAY/100) + (EQ5D5Lindexvalue)). The cut-off percentiles were as follows: low HRQoL: ≤1.8570; high HRQoL: ≥1.8571. Adjusted OR: Adjusted by kids’ age, BMI, and gender ** p-value < 0.01.