TABLE 1.
Data sets on seasonal coronavirus incidence
| Data set | Location | Datese | Samplea | HCoV incidence | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 229E | OC43 | NL63 | HKU1 | |||||
| North America | ||||||||
| i | Rochester, MN, USA | 4/1/2014– 3/31/2020 |
326 | 47 | 103 | 81 | 95 | (25) |
| ii | New York City, NY, USA |
10/2016– 12/2018 |
122 | 31 | 48 | 15 | 28 | (58) |
| —b | Denver, CO, USA | 12/2004– 11/2005 |
84 | 11 | 34 | 37 | 2 | (59) |
| United Kingdom | ||||||||
| iii | Edinburgh, United Kingdom | 7/2006– 6/2009 |
267 | NA | NA | NA | NA | (60) |
| Europe | ||||||||
| iv | Stockholm, Sweden | 1/2010– 2/2020 |
2,093 | 320 | 1,266 | 507 | *c | (61) |
| v | Trøndelag, Norway | 1/2007– 12/2014 |
263 | 16 | 113 | 84 | 50 | (62) |
| vi | Gothenburg, Sweden | 11/2006– 10/2009 |
239 | 33 | 124 | 82 | *c | (24) |
| vii | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 1985– 2011 |
101 | 38 | 30 | 25 | 8 | (21) |
| —b | Tampere, Finland |
9/2009– 8/2011 |
52 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 11 | (63) |
| Asia | ||||||||
| viii | South Koread | 1/2010– 12/2012 |
1,568 | 153 | 871 | 544 | *c | (64) |
| ix | Yamagata, Japan |
1/2010– 12/2014 |
388 | 40 | 94 | 154 | 100 | (65) |
| x | Guangzhou, China | 7/2010– 6/2015 |
293 | 49 | 177 | 44 | 23 | (66) |
| xi | Sarlahi, Nepal |
6/2011– 5/2014 |
270 | 19 | 103 | 70 | 78 | (67) |
| —b | Beijing, China |
5/2005– 4/2009 |
87 | 15 | 50 | 8 | 14 | (68) |
| —b | Hong Kong, China | 4/2014– 5/2015 |
87 | 4 | 53 | 17 | 13 | (69) |
| —b | Sa Kaeo Province, Thailand | 9/1/2003– 8/31/2005 |
83 | 13 | 37 | 19 | 14 | (70) |
| —b | Hong Kong, China | 9/2008– 8/2014 |
77 | 12 | 48 | 6 | 11 | (71) |
| —b | Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand | 7/2009– 6/2010 |
32 | *c | 22 | 9 | 1 | (72) |
| Middle East | ||||||||
| xii | Beersheba, Israel | 7/2015– 6/2016 |
195 | 10 | 96 | 45 | 44 | (73) |
Sample numbers may not agree with the study totals summarized in the Results section because some studies included samples that were not associated with coronavirus infection. Also, tabulated numbers in the table may not agree exactly with numbers in tables from the cited papers because some studies exhibited discrepancies between the raw data and their tabulated summaries. In all cases, we used numbers from the available raw data.
These studies were excluded from our primary analysis because they were composed of low sample sizes (<100) across the calendar year. A secondary analysis of these data sets is presented in the Supplementary Materials.
Samples from this region were not assayed for this virus.
Nationwide.
Month/day/year or month/year.