Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 23;12(12):2725–2743. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00891-1

Table 3.

Distribution of baseline SARS-CoV-2 clades (variants) in the modified intention-to-treat population

Molnupiravir Placebo
N (%)a N (%)a
Modified intention-to-treat population 709 699
Participants with evaluable sequence data 534 (75.3) 529 (75.5)
19B (Washington State) 3 (0.4) 3 (0.4)
20A 4 (0.6) 3 (0.4)
20B 4 (0.6) 4 (0.6)
20D 2 (0.3) 3 (0.4)
20H (Beta) 5 (0.7) 6 (0.9)
20I (Alpha) 17 (2.4) 10 (1.4)
20J (Gamma) 37 (5.2) 50 (7.2)
21A (Delta) 6 (0.8) 4 (0.6)
21G (Lambda) 16 (2.3) 11 (1.6)
21H (Mu) 83 (11.7) 92 (13.2)
21I (Delta) 55 (7.8) 44 (6.3)
21J (Delta) 298 (42.0) 295 (42.2)
Unknownb 4 (0.6) 4 (0.6)
Unavailablec 175 (24.7) 170 (24.3)

N number of participants for the corresponding category

aThe percentage is based on the number of participants in the modified intention-to-treat population

bThe sequence could not be classified (by Nextstrain) into a currently known clade

cNo evaluable sequence data were available. The predominant reasons for participants not having evaluable data were missing samples, poor sequence quality due to viral RNA titers that were too low or too high, or low sequence coverage