Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD006387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006387.pub2

Bartelink 2002.

Methods Location of trial: Europe.
Number of centres: 11.
Funding: not stated.
Trial ID: not stated (EORTC trial).
Participants Inclusion criteria: locally advanced, inoperable head & neck cancer with primaries in oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. T2‐T4 included.
Exclusion criteria: not explicit.
Recruitment period: not stated.
OC: 16/49 (33%).
OP: 23/49 (47%).
OC+OP: 39/49 (80%).
Number randomised: 53.
Number analysed: 49.
Interventions Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split course radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy plus chemotherapy
Hyperfractionated/accelerated/split (n = 25): 1.6 Gy per fraction, 3 fractions per day on weeks 1, 4 & 7 (total dose 72 Gy) with 10 mg/m2 cisplatin IV administered daily between fractions 1 & 2. Interfraction interval varied between 3 & 4 hours.
Conventional (n = 24): 2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week for a total dose of 70 Gy over 7 weeks together with 6 mg/m2 cisplatin IV 30‐60 minutes prior to RT daily.
Outcomes Primary: toxicity.
Secondary: overall survival, locoregional control.
Duration of follow‐up: minimum 24 months.
Notes HR data taken from Kaplan‐Meier graphs (numbers at risk presented).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk "Patients were randomised between" ‐ method of sequence generation not described.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Blinding ‐ Outcome Assessors High risk Not mentioned.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? Unclear risk 3/28 (11%) patients in Gr A and 1/25 (4%) in Gr B did not receive allocated treatment. In this small trial this may have resulted in differences between groups with regard to prognostic factors and introduced bias.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk Primary outcomes are acute and late side effects, but also planned and reported treatment compliance, locoregional control and overall survival.
Free of other bias? Unclear risk There appear to be differences between treatment groups at baseline eg T stage, location of primary tumour and degree of tumour differentiation. No other bias apparent.