Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD006387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006387.pub2

Terz 1981.

Methods Location of trial: USA.
Number of centres: 2.
Funding: not stated.
Trial ID: not stated.
Participants Inclusion criteria: previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma Stages II‐IV of oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx if disease appeared to be technically resectable.
Exclusion criteria: Stage 1 disease, patients with primary tumours of lip, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses or larynx.
Recruitment period: January 1969 to September 1975.
OC: 94/248 (38%).
OP: 72/248 (29%).
OC+OP: 166/248 (67%).
Number randomised: 248.
Number analysed: unclear.
Interventions Pre‐operative radiotherapy versus surgery alone
Pre‐operative radiotherapy (n = 126): 1.4 Gy in 2 equal fractions 48 and 24 hours prior to surgery. Radiotherapy administered through a pair of opposed fields to cover both primary lesion and entire cervical lymph drainage area. Co‐60 source with source to skin = 80 cm. Followed by resection of primary tumour with uni or bilateral neck dissection.
Surgery alone (n = 122): resection of primary tumour with uni or bilateral neck dissection.
Outcomes Primary: complications, operative mortality.
Secondary: recurrence, 5‐year disease free survival.
Duration of follow‐up: 4‐9 years.
Notes HR taken from Kaplan‐Meier graph (no numbers at risk).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk No details on method of sequence generation used. Randomisation was stratified on site of primary tumour and stage of disease.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not mentioned.
Blinding ‐ Outcome Assessors High risk Not mentioned.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? Unclear risk Unclear how many patients are included in the analysis as only percentages are reported.
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Many outcomes reported ‐ complications, operative mortality, locoregional recurrence, disease free survival. Subgroup analyses were also undertaken and it is not clear if these were preplanned.
Free of other bias? Low risk Groups appear similar at baseline. No other apparent bias.