Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2

Schäfer 1996.

Methods Quasi‐randomised trial
Participants 54 OCTR (13 men, 41 women), 47 ECTR (17 men, 30 women); mean age 53 years
Interventions 1‐portal ECTR (Agee) vs OCTR
Outcomes Follow‐up at 9 months
Complications, grip strength, return to work
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Quasi‐randomised, according to the day of the week (odd or even)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Quasi‐randomised, according to the day of the week (odd or even)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No information given. Participants and personnel could not be blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No information given. Participants and personnel could not be blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No participants lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No P values and SDs of all outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk No baseline differences. No information given on financial support