Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2

Westphal 2000.

Methods Single centre RCT
Participants 35 OCTR, 45 ECTR. No information on age or sex
Interventions 1‐portal (ENDO‐CARTRIS®) ECTR vs OCTR
Outcomes Follow‐up at 4 weeks and 3 months
Modified SSS, modified FSS, clinical evaluation, numbness, pain, strength, Phalen, Tinel, 2‐point discrimination, EMG
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information given
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information given
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No information given. Participants and personnel could not be blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No information given. Participants and personnel could not be blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information given
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No P values and SDs of all outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk No baseline differences. No information given about financial support