Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 25;14(12):e00627. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000627

Table 2.

Treatment response outcomes: terlipressin vs midodrine plus octreotide

Variable description CBPS adjusted Unadjusted
Midodrine and octreotide (N = 55) Terlipressin (N = 89)a Mean difference (95% CI) P value Midodrine and octreotide (N = 55) Terlipressin (N = 159) Mean difference (95% CI) P value
HRS reversal, % 20.00 52.35 32.35 (17.40 to 47.30) <0.0001 20.00 44.03 24.03 (10.80 to 37.25) 0.0004
Complete response, % 14.55 48.19 33.65 (19.52 to 47.77) <0.0001 14.55 40.88 26.34 (14.16 to 38.51) <0.0001
Complete or partial response, % 23.64 54.55 30.91 (15.48 to 46.34) 0.0001 23.64 53.46 29.82 (16.04 to 43.61) <0.0001
Change in renal function (SCr) from baseline, mg/dL, mean (SD) 0.22 (1.36) −0.70 (0.94) −0.92 (−1.31 to −0.53) <0.0001 0.22 (1.36) −0.82 (1.09) −1.04 (−1.44 to −0.64) <0.0001
Percent improvement in renal function (SCr) from baseline, mean (SD) −13.42 (57.70) 25.85 (35.21) 39.27 (23.04 to 55.51) <0.0001 −13.42 (57.70) 26.14 (32.94) 39.57 (23.45 to 55.68) <0.0001

CBPS, covariate balancing propensity scoring; CI, confidence interval; HRS, hepatorenal syndrome; SCr, serum creatinine.

a

N = 89 is the effective sample size for the terlipressin cohort after CBPS reweighting.