Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 25;25(1):bbad474. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad474

Table 3.

The Comparison of AUC, AUPRC, Inline graphic-value and Params between various models

Model Network Inline graphic Network Inline graphic Params
AUC AUPRC Inline graphic -value AUC AUPRC Inline graphic -value
DTINet 0.879 0.906 5.31e−10 0.889 0.900 2.08e−7 *
NeoDTI 0.955 0.889 4.84e−8 0.946 0.846 1.99e−4 9.98e10
GCN-DTI 0.918 0.897 1.76e−8 0.922 0.914 1.61e−4 *
IMCHGAN 0.956 0.903 1.06e−4 0.946 0.929 1.35e−3 4.44e5
EEG-DTI 0.954 0.964 2.24e−5 0.942 0.941 2.41e−4 1.84e6
HampDTI 0.928 0.927 5.51e−9 9.92e4
DeepConv-DTI 0.909 0.917 3.23e−8 1.52e6
TripletMultiDTI 0.991 0.990 6.53e−4 1.53e7
AMGDTI 0.977 0.977 0.973 0.971 1.33e5

‘-’ indicates that the model is not applicable to this dataset. ‘Inline graphic-value’ is calculated using AUC as a statistic. ‘*’ indicates that the model is not convenient for parameter statistics. ‘Params’ represents the parameter quantity of the model.