Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 12;14:1283539. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1283539

Table 4.

FPRP analysis for the positive associations of rs1595066 and GDM risk.

Comparison Adjusted OR (95% CI) P Statistical Power Prior probability
0.25 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001
rs1595066
TT vs. CC 0.60 (0.38–0.94) 0.026 0.788 0.090 0.229 0.766 0.971 0.997 1.000
TT vs. CC/CT 0.61 (0.40–0.95) 0.027 0.804 0.092 0.232 0.769 0.971 0.997 1.000
Subgroup
Age >30.09 (year) 0.45 (0.24–0.84) 0.013 0.379 0.093 0.236 0.772 0.972 0.997 1.000
BMI >22.23 (Kg/m2) 0.52 (0.28–0.98) 0.042 0.544 0.188 0.410 0.884 0.987 0.999 1.000
SBP ≤110.08 (mmHg) 0.55 (0.31–0.98) 0.043 0.629 0.170 0.381 0.871 0.986 0.999 1.000
FPG ≤4.79 (mmol/L) 0.40 (0.20–0.78) 0.007 0.254 0.076 0.199 0.732 0.965 0.996 1.000
2hPG ≤7.11 (mmol/L) 0.47 (0.23–0.98) 0.043 0.431 0.231 0.473 0.908 0.990 0.999 1.000
HbA1C ≤5.20 (%) 0.51 (0.27–0.97) 0.040 0.524 0.186 0.407 0.883 0.987 0.999 1.000

Bold values indicate that the differences are statistically significant.