TABLE 3.
Summary table to resume the results obtained with the FE models using GOH material models.
| Calcified 1 properties | IVUS 1 geometry | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVUS 1 | IVUS 2 | IVUS 3 | IVUS 4 | IVUS 5 | Calcified 1 | Calcified 2 | Cellular | Hypocellular | |
| R 2 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.50 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.79 |
| J Linear | 55.73 | 72.91 | 56.35 | 59.87 | 55.92 | 55.73 | 52.06 | 23.55 | 37.39 |
| J non−linear | 18.53 | 33.01 | 35.30 | 44.54 | 44.90 | 18.53 | 16.54 | 16.97 | 44.75 |
Five different geometries and four different fibrotic tissues were analyzed. The first data row represents the R 2 between the real behavior curve and the resulting curve obtained with the second methodology. The last two rows show the cost function value between the and using the first approach (J linear ) and the second one (J non−linear ).