Table 3.
Screen time | |||
---|---|---|---|
<2 h/day (n = 824) |
2–3 h/day (n = 967) |
>3 h/day (n = 309) |
|
Middle risk | n = 112 | n = 134 | n = 30 |
Model A | 1.000 | 1.14 (0.86–1.51) | 0.81 (0.52–1.27) |
Model B | 1.000 | 1.32 (0.98–1.77) | 0.98 (0.61–1.56) |
Model C | 1.000 | 1.32 (0.98–1.77) | 0.98 (0.61–1.56) |
Model D | 1.000 | 1.33 (0.99–1.78) | 1.02 (0.64–1.63) |
High risk | n = 304 | n = 404 | n = 144 |
Model A | 1.000 | 1.26 (1.03–1.55) | 1.43 (1.08–1.89) |
Model B | 1.000 | 1.26 (1.01–1.57) | 1.38 (1.02–1.88) |
Model C | 1.000 | 1.26 (1.01–1.57) | 1.38 (1.02–1.88) |
Model D | 1.000 | 1.26 (1.01–1.57) | 1.35 (0.995–1.84) |
Model A was not adjusted for any variable. Model B was adjusted for age, zone of residence, education level, and occupation. Model C was the same as model B and additionally adjusted for drinking. Model D was the same as model C and additionally adjusted for total energy intake.