Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 12;39(51):18983–18994. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02992

Table 2. Some Previously Published Works on the Adsorptive Removal of IPM Using ACa.

type of AC matrix tested implemented technology removal efficiency [%] qe [mg/g] reference
commercial powdered AC (PAC) WWTP Schonerlinde effluent sample horizontal lab shaker     (44)
granular AC (GAC) mixture of 10 pollutants (IPM standard) fixed-bed filters fresh GAC = 90, used GAC = 30   (45)
precursor of granules of expanded corkboard IPM supplied by Hovione batch system S800 = 90, CP = 70, VP = 65 S800 = 137, CP = 123, VP = 115.5 (46)
sucrose-derived ACs IPM supplied by Hovione batch system SH800 = 89.6, SC800 = 16, NS = 42.9 SH800 = 806, SC800 = 144, NS = 386 (47)
wood powder AC (WPAC) peat powder AC (PPAC) peat granular AC (PGAC) Coconut powder AC (CPAC) IPM supplied by Bracco batch and flow study PGAC = 25, PPAC = 62, WPAC = 82, CPAC = 95 PGAC = 120, PPAC = 350, WPAC = 450, CPAC = 500 (48)
lab-made carbons compared with commercial AC (CP, VP) IPM supplied by Hovione glass vials CP = 70, VP = 65, S3 = 25 CP = 150, VP = 140, S3 = 110 (17)
a

Removal efficiency [%] = [(C0Ce)/C0] × 100, where C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium IPM concentrations. qe [mg/g]: amount of IPM adsorption at equilibrium, (see eq 1). S800: activation of the solid with steam at 800 °C. SH800: activation of the solid with KOH at 800 °C. SC800: activation of the solid with K2CO3 at 800 °C. CP, VP, NS: commercial carbons.