Skip to main content
Singapore Medical Journal logoLink to Singapore Medical Journal
. 2022 Jul 18;64(11):700–706. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022094

Epidemiology of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in a general hospital in Singapore: a retrospective cohort study

Amarasinghe Arachchige Don Nalin Samandika Saparamadu 1,, Lasantha Ratnayake 2
PMCID: PMC10754363  PMID: 35848338

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) are the predominant pathogens causing Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) worldwide.[1] E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI cases show an increasing trend worldwide, with resistance to certain key antimicrobials such as ciprofloxacin, third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems rising to alarming levels.[2-4] This is of great concern owing to the burden it places on patient safety, healthcare systems and the economy. Gram-negative bloodstream infections have become an international concern, with some countries adopting targets and strategies over the past few years.[5]

There is conflicting evidence on the impact of empirical antibiotics and/or multidrug resistance (MDR) status on mortality related to GNBSIs. Some studies demonstrate no or weak associations, while others demonstrate significant associations.[6] Widely observed variations between study designs including statistical methods may contribute to such conflicting evidence.

The epidemiology of GNBSIs has been studied in the local context; however, it has been limited to specific subpopulations.[6,7] Despite the excellent work published over the last two decades, there are no studies investigating the epidemiology of GNBSIs in an unselected population in Singapore. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of two of the most common GNBSIs, namely those caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and identify the associations between 30-day all-cause mortality and inappropriate empirical antibiotic use in an unselected population at a general hospital in Singapore.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a 700-bed general hospital in Singapore. The hospital provides acute medical and surgical care to patients and predominantly serves the communities in the western region of Singapore.

The study was conducted between 1 November 2015 and 31 October 2017 (two years). All patients (>18 years) with mono-bacterial blood cultures positive for E. coli and K. pneumoniae during the study period were included. Patients with further positive blood cultures taken within 14 days from the first specimen and positive for the same organism were considered to have the same episode of bacteraemia.

The following data were collected from the Department of Medical Informatics and the electronic medical records (Epic Systems Corp, Verona, WI, USA) for all included cases: demographic data, comorbidities, onset of infection, timing of specimen collection, culture results, other investigations, treatments, devices inserted/manipulated (e.g. central venous catheters, urinary catheters) over the preceding 28 days, procedures and surgeries 28 days prior to admission, and mortality data up to 30 days. In addition, total bed days and total number of admissions were obtained for each year. All blood culture isolates that were included in the final data analysis were successfully linked to antibiotic susceptibility data from the laboratory information system (Epic Systems Corp).

Ethical approval was obtained from the Domain Specific Review Board of National Healthcare Group, Singapore (reference no. 2018/00253). Findings are reported in accordance with the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

We adopted surveillance definitions from Public Health England.[8] A healthcare associated BSI was defined as a laboratory-confirmed positive blood culture for a Gram-negative pathogen in patients within 48 hours of hospital admission and who had received healthcare in either the community or the hospital in the previous 28 days (community onset, healthcare associated; HCA-BSI), whereas a BSI developed more than 48 hours after hospital admission was considered hospital-acquired BSI (HA-BSI). Patients with GNBSIs detected within 48 hours of hospital admission and who had not received healthcare in either the community or hospital in the previous 28 days were considered to have community-acquired BSIs (CA-BSIs).

Multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria were defined as those with ‘non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes’.[9] Empirical antibiotic therapy was defined as initiation of antibiotics for the treatment of infection before antibiotic susceptibility data was available. Antibiotic therapy was considered inappropriate if the blood culture isolate did not show in vitro susceptibility to any of the antibiotics administered prior to availability of susceptibility data.

The source of infection was defined as the underlying primary focus of bacteraemia, and it was determined based on the clinical notes of the attending physician or infectious diseases physician. If the source of infection was equivocal, it was determined by the researchers based on clinical notes and investigations; however, in an event of sustained ambiguity, the source of infection was classified as ‘unknown’. The encounters were classified as disseminated in cases where there was objective evidence of multiple sources of infection.

A detailed analysis was undertaken for E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage, and general associations between categorical variables were examined using the Chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality and the patient-level predictors of the aetiologies of BSI.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 1,699 GNBSI episodes from the database. Cases with Gram-negative organisms other than E. coli and K. pneumoniae (n = 527), duplicates (n = 162) and incomplete information on most variables (n = 3) were excluded from data analysis, leaving a total of 1,007 cases comprising 700 E. coli and 307 K. pneumoniae BSI [Figure 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Case-selection flowchart shows selection process, with 1,007 encounters included in the analysis after the initial exclusions.

The overall incidences of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were 87 per 10,000 admissions (194.1/100,000 bed days) and 38.1 per 10,000 admissions (85.1/100,000 bed days), respectively. The incidence of E. coli HA-BSI was 11.1 per 100,000 bed days and that of K. pneumoniae was 9.98 per 100,000 bed days. The mean age of the study participants was 71.2 years (standard deviation 14.2). A vast majority of cases were seen in patients aged ≥65 years, with significant male and female preponderance in K. pneumoniae and E. coli, respectively [Figure 2].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Chart shows distribution of age categories across the two aetiologies, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia.

Overall, CA-BSI accounted for 688 (68.3%) cases, and HCA-BSI and HA-BSI accounted for 177 (17.6%) and 76 (7.5%) cases, respectively. We were unable to classify the onset of BSI in 66 (6.5%) cases owing to lack of pre-hospitalisation data from the medical records [Table 1].

Table 1.

Summary of findings for the causative organism for BSIs stratified based on aetiology.

Characteristic n (%) P

E. coli (n=700) K. pneumoniae (n=307)
Incidence
 Overall admissions 87/10,000 38.1/10,000
 Hospital-acquired-BSI bed days 11.1/100,000 9.98/100,000

Agea (yr) 71.5±14.1 68.2±14.2 0.68

Gender
 Female 431 (61.6) 121 (39.4) <0.0001
 Male 269 (38.4) 186 (60.6) <0.0001

Onset of infection
 Community-acquired BSI 488 (69.7) 200 (65.1) 0.341
 Healthcare-associated BSI 127 (18.1) 50 (16.3) 0.611
 Hospital-acquired BSI 40 (5.7) 36 (11.7) 0.001
 Insufficient data 45 (6.4) 21 (6.8)

Source of infection
 Upper urinary tract 448 (64.0) 115 (37.5) <0.0001
 Hepatobiliary 110 (15.7) 39 (12.7) 0.215
 Liver abscess 5 (0.7) 61 (19.9) <0.0001
 Gastrointestinal 32 (4.6) 13 (4.2) 0.812
 Lower respiratory tract 31 (4.4) 19 (6.2) 0.236
 Unknown 59 (8.4) 35 (11.4) <0.0001
 Others 15 (2.1) 25 (8.1) 0.136

Antimicrobial susceptibility
 Non-MDR 499 (71.3) 244 (79.5) 0.007
 MDR 201 (28.7) 63 (20.5)
 MDR community-acquired BSI 116 (57.7) 23 (36.5) 0.009
 MDR healthcare-associated BSI 50 (24.9) 21 (33.3) 0.104
 MDR hospital-acquired BSI 25 (12.4) 14 (22.2) 0.056
 Insufficient data on the onset of infection 10 (5.0) 5 (7.9)

Appropriate empirical therapy
 Yes 546 (78.0) 259 (84.4) 0.019
 No 154 (22.0) 48 (15.6)

30-day all-cause mortality
 Yes 54 (7.7) 29 (9.4)
 No 646 (92.3) 278 (90.6) 0.36
 MDR 24/201 (11.9) 10/63 (15.9)
 Non-MDR 30/499 (6.0) 19/244 (7.8) 0.001
 Community-acquired BSI 17/488 (3.5) 10/200 (5.0)
 Healthcare-associated BSI 11/127 (8.7) 6/50 (12.0) 0.003
 Hospital-acquired BSI 13/40 (32.5) 8/36 (22.2) 0.186
 Insufficient data 13/45 (28.9) 5/21 (23.8) 0.056
 Inappropriate empirical therapy 16/154 (10.4) 12/48 (25.0)
 Appropriate empirical therapy 38/546 (7.0) 17/259 (6.6) 0.001

aData presented as mean ± standard deviation. BSI: bloodstream infection, E. coli: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae: Klebsiella pneumoniae, MDR: multidrug resistance

Upper urinary tract infections (UUTIs), collectively represented cases of pyelonephritis and renal/perinephric abscesses, were reported as the most common focus of infection, irrespective of the onset of BSI in both organisms (n = 563, 55.9%). Overall, hepatobiliary source was the second commonest cause (n = 149, 14.8%). According to the logistic regression analysis, UUTI was significantly associated with E. coli (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.14–23.68; P = 0.001), whereas pyogenic liver abscess was associated with K. pneumoniae (adjusted OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.67; P = 0.013). Furthermore, hepatobiliary (excluding liver abscesses) and gastrointestinal sources were significantly associated with E. coli.

Ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility in E. coli demonstrated a significant year-on-year increase from 25.9% to 33.7% (P = 0.014). No significant trends were observed for K. pneumoniae or MDR rates in both organisms. Regression analysis confirmed that the MDR rate was significantly associated with E. coli isolates (adjusted OR 1.545, 95% CI 1.022–2.335; P = 0.039). Highest MDR rates were observed in HA-BSI for both E. coli and K. pneumoniae [Table 1].

The sources of infection and the aetiologies of BSI did not demonstrate significant associations with 30-day all-cause mortality. However, CA-BSI was significantly associated with lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.33; P < 0.001) [Table 2]. Logistic regression analysis revealed that inappropriate choice of empirical antibiotic therapy was significantly associated (adjusted OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.47–7.77; P = 0.004) with higher rates of 30-day all-cause mortality [Table 2].

Table 2.

Summary of the factors associated with 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections.

Factor Adjusted OR SE 95% CI (upper, lower) P
Recurrent bacteraemia
 No 1
 Yes 1.164 0.46 0.472, 2.869 0.742

Study year
 Second year 1
 First year 1.052 0.313 0.57, 1.942 0.871

Gender
 Female 1
 Male 0.801 0.366 0.391, 1.64 0.544

Comorbidity
 No 1
 Diabetes mellitus 1.084 0.365 0.53, 2.217 0.824
 Hypertension 1.059 0.396 0.487, 2.304 0.884
 Hypercholesterolaemia 1.378 0.366 0.673, 2.824 0.381
 Chronic kidney disease 1.505 0.449 0.624, 3.631 0.363
 Ischaemic heart disease 0.449 0.366 0.219, 0.919 0.029
 Cerebrovascular accident 1.959 0.422 0.856, 4.482 0.111
 Hepatitis 1.428 0.874 0.258, 7.916 0.684
 Cirrhosis 0.408 0.554 0.138, 1.209 0.106
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1.867 0.736 0.441, 7.897 0.396
 History of cancer 0.542 0.38 0.257, 1.141 0.107

Onset of infection
 Insufficient data 1
 Community-acquired BSI 0.129 0.487 0.05, 0.334 <0.001
 Healthcare-associated BSI 0.618 0.521 0.223, 1.715 0.355
 Hospital-acquired BSI 2.526 0.6 0.779, 8.193 0.123

Upper urinary tract infection
 No 1
 Yes 1.812 1.141 0.194, 16.952 0.602

Hepatobiliary
 No 1
 Yes 0.924 1.188 0.09, 9.474 0.947

Liver abscess
 No 1
 Yes 1.536 1.606 0.066, 35.778 0.789

Gastrointestinal
 No 1
 Yes 0.619 1.259 0.052, 7.296 0.703

Unknown source of infection
 No 1
 Yes 0.814 1.191 0.079, 8.408 0.863

Blood culture results
K. pneumoniae 1
E. coli 0.628 0.387 0.294, 1.341 0.23

Multidrug resistant organisms
 No 1
 Yes 0.767 0.454 0.315, 1.866 0.559

Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy
 No 1
 Yes 3.381 0.425 1.471, 7.769 0.004

Immunocompromised host
 No 1
 Yes 0.053 1.407 0.003, 0.84 0.037
Age 1.028 0.017 0.995, 1.061 0.101

Absolute neutrophil count 1.064 0.019 1.026, 1.105 0.001

BSI: bloodstream infection, CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio, SE: standard error

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the epidemiology of E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI in an unselected population in Singapore. In keeping with other studies, E. coli was the commonest GNBSI.[1,10,11] Our incidence rate of E. coli and K. pneumoniae — 87 per 10,000 admissions (194.1/100,000 bed days) and 38.1 per 10,000 admissions (85.1/100,000 bed days), respectively — is much higher than that reported in other similar studies.[12-14]

The most common source of BSI in both organisms was UUTIs. Overall, 24% of patients had possible contributory factors for developing UUTIs such as urinary catheter inserted/manipulated over the preceding 28 days, UTI treatment over the preceding 28 days and recurrent UTI. Of all UUTI patients in our study, 13.8% had a urinary catheter inserted/manipulated in the 28 days prior to onset of BSI. However, what proportion of these catheters was appropriate or adequately monitored is unknown. These findings suggest that a proportion of BSI could potentially be reduced by optimal treatment of UTIs and proper management of urinary catheters. Community-based healthcare plays an important role in reducing E. coli BSIs, as the majority of BSIs secondary to UUTIs are CA-BSIs (54.0%). Other sources of BSIs may offer less potential for interventions to reduce the burden of BSIs unless related to procedures or associated with devices.

Antimicrobial resistance rates were high for both organisms, with a higher MDR rate in E. coli (n = 201, 28.7%) compared to K. pneumoniae (n = 63, 20.5%). The MDR rates were significantly higher in HCA-BSIs and HA-BSIs than in CA-BSIs in both organisms [Tables 1 and 3]. This was consistent with the other studies despite varying definitions of MDR used by the researchers. Although our current carbapenem resistance rate remains low, there is a risk of increasing rates owing to rising cephalosporin and piperacillin/tazobactam resistance encouraging the use of carbapenems.

Table 3.

Summary of the factors associated with Escherichia coli bloodstream infections.

Covariate Adjusted OR SE 95% CI (upper, lower) P
Recurrent bacteraemia
 No 1
 Yes 0.833 0.255 0.506, 1.372 0.473

Study year
 Second year 1
 First year 1.172 0.164 0.849, 1.617 0.335

Gender
 Female 1
 Male 0.542 0.19 0.373, 0.787 0.001

Age category (yr)
 ≥85 1
 15–44 1.64 0.459 0.667, 4.035 0.282
 45–84 1.399 0.243 0.87, 2.251 0.166

Admitting ward/specialty
 Intensive care unit 1
 Medical 0.676 0.516 0.246, 1.858 0.448
 Surgical 0.813 0.555 0.274, 2.413 0.709
Onset of infection
 No sufficient data 1
 Community-acquired BSI 0.796 0.328 0.419, 1.512 0.485
 Healthcare-associated BSI 0.699 0.367 0.341, 1.435 0.33
 Hospital-acquired BSI 1.548 0.399 0.708, 3.385 0.273

MDR
 No 1
 Yes 1.545 0.211 1.022, 2.335 0.039

Comorbidity
 No 1
 Diabetes mellitus 0.556 0.189 0.383, 0.806 0.002
 Hypertension 0.862 0.215 0.565, 1.314 0.49
 Hypercholesterolaemia 1.294 0.187 0.897, 1.868 0.168
 Chronic kidney disease 0.617 0.218 0.402, 0.947 0.027
 Ischaemic heart disease 1.341 0.203 0.9, 1.998 0.149
 Cerebrovascular accident 1.345 0.215 0.883, 2.047 0.168
 Hepatitis 0.718 0.352 0.36, 1.43 0.345
 Cirrhosis 0.865 0.367 0.421, 0.693
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2.395 0.483 0.929, 6.169 0.071
 History of cancer 0.791 0.242 0.492, 1.27 0.331

Upper urinary tract infection
 No 1
 Yes 7.121 0.613 2.142, 23.677 0.001

Hepatobiliary
 No 1
 Yes 5.401 0.625 1.586, 18.393 0.007

Liver abscess
 No 1
 Yes 0.152 0.761 0.034, 0.675 0.013

Gastrointestinal
 No 1
 Yes 6.272 0.699 1.593, 24.703 0.009

Lower respiratory tract infection
 No 1
 Yes 3.061 0.694 0.785, 11.932 0.107

Unknown source of infection
 No 1
 Yes 3.394 0.642 0.964, 11.947 0.057

BSI: bloodstream infection, CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio, SE: standard error

Our mortality rates are lower than those reported in other studies, where E. coli mortality ranged from 11% to >30%. This variation is likely due to some studies examining specific patient populations.[2,10,15] Similarly, the mortality in K. pneumoniae demonstrates a wide variation.[10,15-17] Our low mortality rate may be attributable to the higher proportion of patients with UUTIs (n = 563, 55.9%), higher rates of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (n = 805, 79.9%), and the lack of severely immunocompromised patients or low severity of sepsis. Mortality rates were higher in HA-BSIs and HCA-BSIs as opposed to CA-BSIs for both organisms, and the latter was significantly associated with a lower mortality, which was consistent with the previous studies.[10,15,17] Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was significantly associated with increased 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.47–7.77; P = 0.004).

Our study has several limitations. Firstly, it was a retrospective study carried out in a single acute hospital. Thus, it is not representative of the overall epidemiology in Singapore. Secondly, we did not evaluate the severity of BSIs/sepsis at the time of specimen collection, and therefore, this was not included in the regression analysis as a confounder. It is possible that a lower proportion of patients who had organ dysfunction or septic shock in our study may have underestimated our mortality rates. Thirdly, we were unable to study long-term trends as our hospital was opened in mid-2015. Finally, we did not have access to all healthcare services received in the community, and therefore, a proportion of patients categorised as CA-BSIs may actually have HCA-BSIs.

We identified relatively high incidence rates and high MDR rates of GNBSI in our healthcare setting. Our study adds to existing evidence that the inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy is significantly associated with higher 30-day all-cause mortality. Moreover, we recognise optimal treatment of urinary tract infections and proper management of urinary catheters, in particular, in the community setting as a potential intervention to reduce the incidence of GNBSIs. Given the current incidence rates and MDR rates of GNBSIs, we recommend concerted and streamlined efforts to bring various elements of existing surveillance mechanisms and interventions together.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank Ms Goh Yee Chin Joey, Senior Informatics Officer, Ng Teng General Hospital, Singapore, for her tremendous support with data extraction. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of Dr Chan Yiong Huak (Mentor, Biostatistics Unit, National University of Singapore) and Dr Albie Sharpe (Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia) in reviewing the manuscript and of Ms Kimberly Price (linguistic specialist) in proofreading the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Laupland KB, Church DL. Population-based epidemiology and microbiology of community-onset bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:647–64. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bou-Antoun S, Davies J, Guy R, Johnson AP, Sheridan EA, Hope RJ. Descriptive epidemiology of Escherichia coli bacteraemia in England, April 2012 to March 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30329. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.35.30329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Mee-Marquet NL, Blanc DS, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Dos Santos Borges S, Viboud Q, Bertrand X, et al. Marked increase in incidence for bloodstream infections due to Escherichia coli, a side effect of previous antibiotic therapy in the elderly. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:646. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Public Health England. Laboratory surveillance of Klebsiella spp. bacteraemia in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: 2017. [[Last accessed on 2019 Mar 20]]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/723021/hpr2418_klbsll.pdf .
  • 5.National Health Service, UK. Preventing healthcare associated Gramnegative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI) [[Last accessed on 2019 Mar 15]]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/patient-safety/preventing-gram-negativebloodstream-infections/
  • 6.Lye DC, Earnest A, Ling ML, Lee TE, Yong HC, Fisher DA, et al. The impact of multidrug resistance in healthcare-associated and nosocomial Gram-negative bacteraemia on mortality and length of stay:Cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:502–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03606.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee KH, Hui KP, Tan WC, Lim TK. Klebsiellabacteraemia: A report of 101 cases from National University Hospital, Singapore. J Hosp Infect. 1994;27:299–305. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90117-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Health Service, UK. Guidance on the definition of healthcare associated Gram-negative bloodstream. [[Last accessed on 2019 Mar 15]]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/HCA_BSI_definitions_guidance.pdf .
  • 9.Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria:An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:268–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takeshita N, Kawamura I, Kurai H, Araoka H, Yoneyama A, Fujita T, et al. Unique characteristics of community-onset healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: A multi-centre prospective surveillance study of bloodstream infections in Japan. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buetti N, Marschall J, Atkinson A, Kronenberg A Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance (ANRESIS) National bloodstream infection surveillance in Switzerland 2008-2014:Different patterns and trends for university and community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:1060–7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Health Protection Scotland. Healthcare associated infection annual report 2014. [[Last accessed on 2019 Apr 05]]. Available from: https://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/web-resources-container/healthcare-associated-infection-annualreport-2014/
  • 13.National Public Health Service for Wales. All Wales top ten bacteraemia annual report January – December 2018. [[Last accessed on 2019 Apr 05]]. Available from: www2.nphs.wales.nhs.uk: 8080/WHAIPDocs.nsf .
  • 14.Alicino C, Giacobbe DR, Orsi A, Tassinari F, Trucchi C, Sarteschi G, et al. Trends in the annual incidence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaebloodstream infections: A 8-year retrospective study in a large teaching hospital in northern Italy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:415. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1152-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coombs G, Bell JM, Daley D, Collignon P, Cooley L, Gottlieb T, et al. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance sepsis outcome programs 2016 report. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. [[Last accessed on 2019 Mar 22]]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AGAR-Sepsis-Outcome-Program-2016-Report-February-2018.pdf .
  • 16.Meatherall BL, Gregson D, Ross T, Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Am J Med. 2009;122:866–73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vading M, Nauclér P, Kalin M, Giske CG. Invasive infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae is a disease affecting patients with high co-morbidity and associated with high long-term mortality. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Singapore Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES